It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: denning2000
a reply to: rhynouk
It's not about the doubting entity, be it Russia, or be it those of us who can see through all of the rubbish fed to the masses via the government controlled media. It's about logistics. It's about human capabilities. It's about technological capabilities back in 1969 as compared to now, given that even now we are not able to safely travel to the moon and back.
The moon landings were a hoax. End of story. But the US government did not foresee the advancement in communication, namely the internet, which would expose their untruths.
How anyone could believe that man has walked on the moon is beyond me.
It's a mix of hypnosis, patriotism, and a need to display dominance, by a country that, for whatever reason, sees itself as being the rulers of the world.
And that is the simple fact of the matter.
JD
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
Still - comedy gold appears to be on the horizon!
originally posted by: denning2000
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
part from surviving astronauts, reflectors on the moon, Saturn rockets at various museums........
You mean the surviving astronauts who all refused talk about their trips to the moon and back, choosing to shy away from publicity instead? You mean reflectors on the moon that may or may not be there but because we're told they are we have to believe that? And rockets at various museums...meaning...what exactly?
I'm curious - do you believe that all the space walk footage you see on the international space station is filmed in space?
JD
The only clear images of anything are computer simulations
originally posted by: denning2000
a reply to: jaffo
ALL of the tech used to make the trip is available for you to check out and have explained to you.
Jaffo I have spent the past ten years or more checking things out. What I see in support of NASA's claims re two things - words and imagery. The only clear images of anything are computer simulations, which means they are effectively movies, and as for all the words, America has no choice other than to defend its original claims. As I said, because of the internet, the jig is up, but they can't come out now and admit it. The economic consequences alone would be unimaginable, let alone the social consequences.
JD
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
The Russian Troll Army has consciously crafted a strategy wherein they appeal to conspiracy theorists of all stripes in order to undermine the credibility of resistance to Russian expansionism. RT has run features on UFOs,, ancient aliens, Nibiru and other fringe theories simply to expand their exposure to the critical-thinking-challenged.
Mythbusters did it, or they watched it being done and filmed it:
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
I would like you to expand on your claim. Please explain how "the reflectors can easily be verified to exist".