I'm sorry I can't reedit endlessly.
This is a gross failure of Francis just before the world awaited him to release the encyclical on ecology, with possible mentioning of multi worlds
view, or extraterrestrial beings.
While the world expected the pope to move beyond the historic negativity of the Roman church, he gives a setback at home, against the core of
believers. How then they would accept his future words of novelty, if he hits hard against novelty as he called it of apparitions?
It is hard to understand labyrinth and I do not pretend to understand it. Apparently we have multiple agendas one atop the other. Presented in order
to delude even the smartest ones. Does it mean we will not be told everything, even if multi worlds are indeed mentioned? We will not be told of those
martians are they good or bad, that the pope agreed to baptize in theory?
Tom Horn said it more, that the Vatican already aligned itself with negative aliens. Well, until now I didn't want to accept it as true. It all
depends on the actions of the Vatican where it will put itself.
Let notice that many apparitions could be false, in terms of being made by extraterrestrials with some agenda, to play Mary. But, is it Medjugorje
too? Again, if you don't allow even one or several apparitions among hundreds, if you rule out that all apparitions at the moment that occur around
the world, are practically demonic, or self delusional, then you run the risk of being irrelevant and the people not to take you seriously even for
those cases when you are right. That is what the Vatican is preparing to jump at. Once banning Medjugorje, there will be virtually no barrier left
untouched for both Vaticans and fundamental faithful to accuse each other of much worse things. There will be nothing to fear to lose anymore.
It will remain only to expect the rescue spaceships, and once saved to look back at earth on a screen and to be told what was all about - was it the
real End times or just their play out.
Let remember again the Vatican allowed the publishing of a book of the Fatima seer's nuns, who retold her vision of polar shift, quakes and tsunami. A
part of the truth let to be leaked, by those same people.
Whether that will end up with an antichrist, or it will end up in tsunami and lava, practically it is the same if you are saved from it.
The pope said in the last weeks he didn't watch TV since 1990s. Good, no matter he is the most televised person on the planet. He said he didn't read
internet. Good, no matter he is the second Twitter on the planet. Now that takes new dimensions.
He says that to absolve himself from any negative feedback his rulings may get from the faithful. There are conservative sites who are much harsh in
their assessment of this pope. The pope declares he doesn't care, he doesn't read, and he will do whatever he thinks to do regardless of what the
public thinks of it. His only feedback is one mainstream Italian newspaper. And of course his aides that I believe read everything.
The day before Francis said, remove the computers from your kids' rooms, and put them in the common room! Well, it is not only computers it is cell
phones. Does the pope speak only of US and West Europe, btw? On first sight, that is logical, to control no filth is being watched. On second sight
however, that has much more drastic consequences. How about an important message to be spread tomorrow on internet, not so much on TV but surely on
some websites, that the pope doesn't want your kids to see it first?
How about Extraterrestrial message? The kids are the first to respond positively even before their parents. How about an attempt to put a barrier of
censorship between conservative parents and more open kinds that is natural? Are we talking of a Rescue message?
I believe such will be given in the air, not only online.
Will the pope allow the kids to watch the new Star Wars serials, if he himself doesn't watch them?
Will the pope endorse Palpatine? He should have watched some early episodes of Star Wars.
What we are said is just absurd. That man at the top to say what is right and what is wrong.
This is the lowest point of Francis, but there could be lower than that. For me he is no more the man who will do a change to some global betterment.
He still could play it much worse though. I already said on previous less dramatic occasions: why doesn't he resign? He wasn't the first choice of
cardinals anyway. Cardinal Oulett was, and he granted papacy to Bergoglio. (why that is possible in first place, IDK). Perhaps it is a good occasion
for Bergoglio to step down at the height of his glory, with already printed historical encyclical. He will be fiercely criticized by all sides anyway,
once the text appears on June 18, regardless of what is inside it. Perhaps now is the time Bergoglio goes out to "eat pizza unrecognized" and not
becoming the "Antichrist" in the view of so many conservatives, both catholics and non-catholics.
He is still supported by MSM, and one may ask, why? When the core catholics are rather unhappy of the choice, and of the so many words of that man
said for 2 years afterwards. Why should the MSM continue creating the image of the peacemaker, if he brings the spiritual war right into the core of
the Catholic Church? Next is to start ban books and people who preach them. Excommunications may be? What worse could happen that haven't happened
already in history? It is a time for Bergoglio to go. He tried hard, and that try wasn't successful. There is already dissent among bishops who take
opposite sides about the moral issues. Will he wait until they go instead of him, and we see one church in West Europe-North Am, and another one in
the Third World, with some dioceses switching between? One of the many possibilities. One just can't have 15th century style of rule, even when he
talks of aliens, and expects the masses will cheer all the time. Actually, if you count in percents, the masses are not so many compared to the
billion wide church. The people were bused to Rio from neighboring countries and cities to make the Copacabana's once at the time show. But think for
a moment, what are 4 mln people compared to the 500 mln Latin America that sees withdrawal from Catholicism at the rate of 1% a year may be?
edit on 10-6-2015 by 2012newstart because: (no reason given)