USA suppresses the facts of the violation of the Minsk agreements by Kiev

a reply to: Boomorangatangarang

So basically what I said is correct.

Multiple sources that call berkut a pro-Russian outfit isn't good enough.

You want something from berkut saying that's what they are.

a reply to: Shamrock6

Those articles mention it in passing as an introductory footnote.

You are putting words in my mouth.

I want details of this connection, but all I get is sarcasm, which is inherently counter-productive.

a reply to: Boomorangatangarang

I'm on a mobile and here's my results of a quick google search:

Out of the top ten results, 6 of them mention "pro-Russian group cyber-berkut" in the tiny little snippet under each search hot.

You want a thesis paper connecting all the dots for you, I'm sure you can find one. Berkut has only ever attacked nato or nato allied countries.

It's highly entertaining that you're going to sit there and demand everything be carefully and diligently laid out for you, all while pleading ignorance in the face of multiple sources naming CB as being a pro-Russian hacktavist group. Especially when one considers they've never once attacked anything Russian, or obtained anything that would damage Russian image.