It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: hadriana
A tax exempt group that funds education for legislators? Why would anyone be angry about that? /end sarcasm
Would love to see the IRS drop their political head hunts and go after these dirt bags!
I can dream can't I?
Thanks for the post OP! I was aware of ALEC, but you filled in some holes I was unaware of!
originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
Well I'm not so I'd like it if the OP can say what Alec is, what hotel this was who was the reporter and most importantly why I should care about this. So please OP or anyone else???¿¿¿
originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: hadriana
So the corporations write the bills for the legislators? I am not surprised. The "authors" might not even read them over.
originally posted by: deckdel
a reply to: FyreByrd
I tend to disagree.
Under TPP and TTIP in particular, the local state legislation would not be able to pull this sort of law (telecom related) without consolidation through FEDs with the international counterparts.
So, in this case TPP and TTIP would actually work in favor of the democracy.
Anything which affects trade and free movement of goods, and their associated regulations, from state to Feds would be in TPP and TTIP under international agreement.
So, for example the pesticide bill in the news cast there, even that would be illegal under the TPP/TTIP framework. And most defenetively the whole ALEC procedure would be flushed off as it is. It has no place in the proposed system.
You got to remember, US of A pours 2 TRILLION dollars in those fed and state legislations and regulations !!! Cost of regulation