It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: Gryphon66
Can Hillary steal your tax money, and not mine?
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: Gryphon66
Clearly your entire post was satirical. I'm assuming you'd like to see H. Clinton for president in 2016. When she steals more than $6 billion, can she steal it from your paycheck, and not mine?
Oh, and about polls...
Political Polling is a Farce
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: Gryphon66
Glad I could accurately interpret everything you've said. My assessment of your post is spot on.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
Well, personally, I don't believe Hillary Clinton is tech savvy enough to completely destroy digital evidence without a computer expert.
A rock, Hammer or some other blunt object is just as good and anyone can use it, even if they aren't tech savvy.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
Well, personally, I don't believe Hillary Clinton is tech savvy enough to completely destroy digital evidence without a computer expert.
A rock, Hammer or some other blunt object is just as good and anyone can use it, even if they aren't tech savvy.
Hillary left all of that to her attorneys, so they can claim Attorney/client privilege when they refuse to answer questions under oath before investigators.
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: Gryphon66
You've repeated your sarcasm twice now. So tell me, are you still a staunch supporter of H. Clinton? Or has that changed?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
Well, personally, I don't believe Hillary Clinton is tech savvy enough to completely destroy digital evidence without a computer expert.
A rock, Hammer or some other blunt object is just as good and anyone can use it, even if they aren't tech savvy.
Hillary left all of that to her attorneys, so they can claim Attorney/client privilege when they refuse to answer questions under oath before investigators.
Which would, given the overwhelming evidence against Clinton, would either result in contempt charges or would make no difference at all, right?
Surely you're excited about these developments, IAMTAT? Mr. Gowdy is going to visit justice on Mrs. Clinton.
Surely that's what you've been waiting for, right?
Again, why aren't you guys EXCITED about this news?
The truth is finally going to come out, once and for all.
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: Gryphon66
Shall I bring up some of your previous posts where you were riding people pretty hard about the benghazi probe, and other areas, claiming that it was all nonsense and that if there wasn't anything to them after all this time, that there was nothing there at all? I'd be more than happy to if you need a reminder.
I see right through your sarcasm and am calling you out for your not so subtle attempts at chiding people in here.
*sigh* On second thought, I'm falling for the derailing and off topic posts. I'm done engaging.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
Well, personally, I don't believe Hillary Clinton is tech savvy enough to completely destroy digital evidence without a computer expert.
A rock, Hammer or some other blunt object is just as good and anyone can use it, even if they aren't tech savvy.
Hillary left all of that to her attorneys, so they can claim Attorney/client privilege when they refuse to answer questions under oath before investigators.
Which would, given the overwhelming evidence against Clinton, would either result in contempt charges or would make no difference at all, right?
Surely you're excited about these developments, IAMTAT? Mr. Gowdy is going to visit justice on Mrs. Clinton.
Surely that's what you've been waiting for, right?
Again, why aren't you guys EXCITED about this news?
The truth is finally going to come out, once and for all.
"In light of the Secretary's unprecedented email arrangement with herself and her decision nearly two years after she left office to permanently delete all emails and because the equities at stake involve not only those of the Select Committee and Congress more broadly, but also those of the American people and their right to the full record of her tenure as secretary of State, we will work with the leadership of the House of Representatives as the Committee considers next steps.
Read Latest Breaking News from newsmax.com
originally posted by: everyone
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: ~Lucidity
No really its not..
Congress is exercising their oversight on the executive branch. We lost 4 Americans from a terrorist attack while the administration, including Hillary by the way, wanted to blame some nonsense youtube video.
Is she lying then or is she lying now?
for a person who doesn't like to be called Partisan you have a bad habit of insinuating that those going after Clinton are somehow sexist. My dislike of her has nothing to do with her being a female and everything to do with accountability.
Where the HELL did I say anything about sexist? Now you're just trippin, dude.
No he is not "trippin".
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
originally posted by: greencmp
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
originally posted by: 2Spooky4Me
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
Good. Can we stop talking about this now?
Why in the hell should we stop talking about it? It's something that caused the loss of American lives. Would you be so nonchalantly posting Walking Dead meme's if a member of your family was killed in the attacks? Especially knowing it could have been prevented/deescalated?
I have to shake my head at the sheer stupidity and sheer willingness to look the other way when the corrupt does wrong. Murder does not have an expiration date.
To "the owlbear", are you daft? Seriously?
Hillary Clinton, pretty much all the previous presidents for the last, what, fifty years? PLUS the current POTUS as well as the various goons in D.C. have worked, and are currently working for themselves, not the people. Our interests are put last, which is so blazingly obvious in this whole email scandal. "Why should *I* care about the law? That's for everyone else, my desires and interests far outweigh the common interest!".
Disgusting.
Whatever were you outraged about before there was even email? About the hundreds of pols who never even use email? About the fact that virtually nothing that important would ever even BE committed to an email to begin with?
This entire subject is a non-starter in addition to having already been beaten to death both here and in the media.
There simply is nothing left to say about it. In many, many peoples' opinions. No matter how outraged some people are or how much hand wringing and dramatizing some people care to do about it.
I agree. Disgusting
I am truly amazed by either your allegiance to this woman or your complete disregard for transparency, I am not sure which.
My allegiance? I am not talking about a WOMAN. I am talking about an ISSUE. I think it is you and your ilk here who are worked up about a particular WOMAN, not I.
And I am truly amazed by your belief that any politician with half a brain cell would document anything truly classified or secret or important or damning to email.
And further amazed that you get you then get so worked up over transparency in only one case and aren't scurrying around digging up probably equally or more damning transgressions with email.
To add to that quote, very damning info has surfaced ranging from buissenes people to high level politicians. Your claim that this simple does not happen is ... well , staggering.
Also your assumption (Assuming - Something for which you blame just about everyone who responded directly to you for) that the people here discussing hillary's fraudulent and suspicious actions and words never care for transparency anywhere else except in this case about what this woman is doing is even a bit more then just a assumption.