It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ItalianDressing
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: ItalianDressing
Um the fact that we have satellites that track everything along with radar. The technology we have in this day in age, at least the kind we are allowed to know about, is more than capable of knowing what happened.
Satellites via GPS yes, but as you must know such tech can go wrong and break down. It is not unheard of...
This whole MH370 is just a bunch of lies and misleads.
So you have no evidence? just claims of conspiracy....and more baseless assumptions.
Yes just like 9/11, no direct evidence, but my tiny brain can easily see the hogwash. You do not need evidence when it is blatantly obvious. Especially the important people on board the plane. Very much motive.
ID
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: ItalianDressing
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: ItalianDressing
Um the fact that we have satellites that track everything along with radar. The technology we have in this day in age, at least the kind we are allowed to know about, is more than capable of knowing what happened.
Satellites via GPS yes, but as you must know such tech can go wrong and break down. It is not unheard of...
This whole MH370 is just a bunch of lies and misleads.
So you have no evidence? just claims of conspiracy....and more baseless assumptions.
Yes just like 9/11, no direct evidence, but my tiny brain can easily see the hogwash. You do not need evidence when it is blatantly obvious. Especially the important people on board the plane. Very much motive.
ID
Really, that summed it up nicely for me. "Evidence? We don't need no stinkin evidence."
Oh okay
originally posted by: Psynic
You obviously don't know what an "assumption" is.
An assumption, in this case, is a theory based on one single piece of information.
assumption
Definition of assumption in English:
noun
1 A thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof: they made certain assumptions about the market
That information has been provided by Inmarsat.
It required that someone invent, that is to say, create for the first time ever, in the history of the world, a brand new way to determine the position of an airplane that defies the laws of mathematics.
I call it "The Miracle Formula".
Once you swallow the formula everything makes sense.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: Psynic
You obviously don't know what an "assumption" is.
An assumption, in this case, is a theory based on one single piece of information.
Funny.
Not in this nor any other case do you get to change the definition of a word to suit your argument/agenda.
assumption
Definition of assumption in English:
noun
1 A thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof: they made certain assumptions about the market
More evidence of your disconnect from reality...
That information has been provided by Inmarsat.
And yet Inmarsat do not share your opinion on this matter hmm...
It required that someone invent, that is to say, create for the first time ever, in the history of the world, a brand new way to determine the position of an airplane that defies the laws of mathematics.
I call it "The Miracle Formula".
Once you swallow the formula everything makes sense.
The above made little to no sense to me, could you clarify?
originally posted by: Psynic
What are the pieces of this puzzle?
(1) MH370 turns off transponders.
(2) Ceases (coherent) radio communication.
(3) Reverses course.
(4) Alters course.
(5) Alters course.
(6) Alters course.
(7) Is tracked on Malaysian radar.
(8) Confusion and questioning between ATC and other aircraft in the area.
(9) Malaysian Military Radar has MH370 on a northerly track exiting the Straits of Malacca near the Andaman Islands on a course towards Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan.
(10) (from Najib and Obama's address a month later: "When asked to interdict" on a possible shipment of WMD Malayasia has "never failed")
(11) Malaysia see MH370 on radar, off course, un-responsive and soon to be departing their sector.
(12) Jet fighter interceptors ARE scrambled.
____________________________________
These are the essential facts as I see them.
edit on -05:0015153592015-03-13T13:59:15-05:00 by Psynic because: delete xs
originally posted by: Psynic
What are the pieces of this puzzle?
(1) MH370's transponders go off.
(2) Ceases (coherent) radio communication.
(3) Reverses course.
I don't think anyone is refuting the facts. I think it's more a case of people coming to different conclusions based on the facts.
originally posted by: Psynic
I'll ask again.
Can anyone refute the 12 facts I posted?
Start with the first one.
I'll make it even easier and re-word it from "MH370 turns off transponders" to " MH370's transponders go off.
originally posted by: Psynic
What are the pieces of this puzzle?
(1) MH370's transponders go off.
(2) Ceases (coherent) radio communication.
(3) Reverses course.
Anyone
originally posted by: Psynic
Do you have ANYTHING other than one MIC corporation's tailor made alibi to hide the interdiction of a hijacked airliner.
But congratulations for being the first dis-informer to play the shame card.
originally posted by: Psynic
(4) Alters course.
(5) Alters course.
(6) Alters course.
(7) Is tracked on Malaysian radar.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: Psynic
Do you have ANYTHING other than one MIC corporation's tailor made alibi to hide the interdiction of a hijacked airliner.
Do you have anything to back up your claims, other than the musings and suppositions of conspiracy theorists? I suspect not, so why do you automatically assume that the MSM is lying and the far-fetched conspiracy theories are true, especially since history shows that is almost never the case?
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
I don't think anyone is refuting the facts. I think it's more a case of people coming to different conclusions based on the facts.
originally posted by: Psynic
I'll ask again.
Can anyone refute the 12 facts I posted?
Start with the first one.
I'll make it even easier and re-word it from "MH370 turns off transponders" to " MH370's transponders go off.
originally posted by: Psynic
What are the pieces of this puzzle?
(1) MH370's transponders go off.
(2) Ceases (coherent) radio communication.
(3) Reverses course.
Anyone