It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kwakakev
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: kwakakev
Because Israel and SA have functioning militaries that will not run/surrender/join them.
Have you got any links or come across some news reports of Israel or SA going up against ISIS? How did it turn out?
Seems the crew is already here to slander and discredit Duff, so you know there's something to it.
originally posted by: antoinemarionette
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
So Duff mentioning the government is working with ETs makes him disreputable.
Right.
China has spread the rumor that it has developed a genetic weapon that would kill all “non-Mongolian” human life. Consider this a “confirmed rumor.”
Other claims of “capabilities” of “black oil, something right out of X-Files (literally) include a myriad of “zombie/shape-shifter” modes.
A previously known threat, a nano-substance known to inhabit seaborne oil deposits, had been activated by a signal from an off planet location. This substance has become sentient, aggressive and shown itself capable of disabling ships and killing humans.(strong confirmations)
You left out, conveniently I might add, part of the quote.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Bilk22
Edit: Seems the crew is already here to slander and discredit Duff, so you know there's something to it.
So posting VT news items is slandering and discrediting?
2010 Treaty With Off World “Settlers” Begs Nuke First Strike
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
MORE CONFIRMED
A previously known threat, a nano-substance known to inhabit seaborne oil deposits, had been activated by a signal from an off planet location. This substance has become sentient, aggressive and shown itself capable of disabling ships and killing humans.(strong confirmations)
www.veteranstoday.com...
Why is posting that slander?
As far as Thomas McInerney is concerned can you quote Duff on what he said?
Other claims of “capabilities” of “black oil, something right out of X-Files (literally) include a myriad of “zombie/shape-shifter” modes. I would be much happier if I were able to add a note of humor stating that this last claim came from a less reliable source.
I, personally, don’t find this last part easy to believe. Other aspects of what is written are things I can confirm through both sources and extrapolation
originally posted by: Bilk22
You left out, conveniently I might add, part of the quote.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Bilk22
Edit: Seems the crew is already here to slander and discredit Duff, so you know there's something to it.
So posting VT news items is slandering and discrediting?
2010 Treaty With Off World “Settlers” Begs Nuke First Strike
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
MORE CONFIRMED
A previously known threat, a nano-substance known to inhabit seaborne oil deposits, had been activated by a signal from an off planet location. This substance has become sentient, aggressive and shown itself capable of disabling ships and killing humans.(strong confirmations)
www.veteranstoday.com...
Why is posting that slander?
As far as Thomas McInerney is concerned can you quote Duff on what he said?
Other claims of “capabilities” of “black oil, something right out of X-Files (literally) include a myriad of “zombie/shape-shifter” modes. I would be much happier if I were able to add a note of humor stating that this last claim came from a less reliable source.
I, personally, don’t find this last part easy to believe. Other aspects of what is written are things I can confirm through both sources and extrapolation
Sort of gives it a different meaning now, don't you think?
I would be much happier if I were able to add a note of humor stating that this last claim came from a less reliable source.
strong confirmations
previously known threat
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: kwakakev
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: kwakakev
Because Israel and SA have functioning militaries that will not run/surrender/join them.
Have you got any links or come across some news reports of Israel or SA going up against ISIS? How did it turn out?
Exactly my point, ISIS doesn't go after them because they would lose. Perhaps you did not understand.
yea that's a fine group right there, and everything they say can be trusted.
originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Just done a quick search at how Israel, Saudi Arabia and Iran are with ISIS. Iran is making the biggest threats against ISIS and are talking about invading Iraq to defend its government. Israel and Saudi Arabia look to be more in a recruitment drive building up the ISIS troops.
If Iran was as good friends with ISIS as Israel and Saudi Arabia then my theory would be empty. This is not the case so the theory put forth by veterans today and one that I agree with does hold some weight.
Yet everything what the westren news outlets say can be trusted because they are trusted and reablie as they have military analysts on the news programs?
Is that your logic?
If this was AFP you would agree and trust if this was Russian you would call it Russian propaganda i can still the Russian paranoia is still growing strong in here.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: kwakakev
Because Israel and SA have functioning militaries that will not run/surrender/join them.
No it's because SA is financing them and there isn't enough women and children for Israel to fight.
Oh so it was an entire army of women and Children that attacked Israel and lost? Maybe you can source the composition being as such.
The depths of your hatred would be hilarious were it not so sad.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Sremmos80
It's someone FROM Veteran's Today that made the speech. Whether it happened or not is moot, the person giving the speech is not someone whose opinion a reasonable person would care about.
Had you even bothered to listen to the video then you would know what he was telling was the truth.
If you did listen to it what did he get wrong?
How about you show me a credible source and I will listen. There is zero point in listening to anything they say, and the fact you are so bought into it and do not care about how bad the source is so long as it agrees with your beliefs is telling.