It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FissionSurplus
Look at the pics of these children at the holding facilities. They are NOT starving. They look pretty good, if you ask me. The ones with mothers and tiny babies, those women are actually heavy set. NOT starving.
Let's get our facts straight. The bleeding heart "poor starving children" tact is bull. There are plenty of kids here who need food and medical care who are citizens. That is where I want my tax money to go. Getting awfully tired of those who really do NOT pay taxes deciding how my tax dollars should be spent.
originally posted by: CagliostroTheGreat
a reply to: sirlancelot
Trillion dollar death budget? Okay. That's totally legit. Our country needs smart missiles and million dollar fighter jets, duh. Feeding hungry kids? lol, f### that. We've got wars to win.
Pppbt!
We've got wars to win.
originally posted by: Grovit
a reply to: muse7
i dont have a a plan.
the US gov should have a responsibility to US citizens first.
originally posted by: muse7
So what's your great plan to deal with them? They are here and they are under the supervision of the U.S. Government and they must be taken care of.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Night Star
Instead of screaming, "don't take care of them, take care of us!", we should be screaming, "stop spending money on stupid stuff so you can take care of ALL of us!" It doesn't have to be an either/or. We have enough money to take care of everyone who is here, providing we stop spending that money on things that don't benefit the people. I don't understand why people can't see that. We are getting angry at the wrong thing. Don't get angry that hungry children are being fed. Get angry that more money isn't allocated towards making sure ALL hungry children living here are being fed.