It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: windword
There is stalls in the men's room as well...
Always has been...
originally posted by: Grovit
if she has the right(for lack of a better word) to be uncomfortable with using the boys room, then all the others gilrs have the same right to be uncomfortable with sharing the bathroom with her...
why do their feelings matter less?
originally posted by: NavyDoc
That's a valid point. Why does one person's set of feelings trump everybody else's set of feelings. The answer is that in our current politically correct society, only certain feelings that line up with the program are valid and everything else is "bigoted."
originally posted by: windword
Because of the OBVIOUS gender difference, biology be damned!
right away im a bigot because i stated my opinion that she is a boy
big·ot
ˈbiɡət/
noun
a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
"don't let a few small-minded bigots destroy the good image of the city"
well, for the record i can see why she would be uncomfortable using the boys room. i get it.
your the one that said something to the effect that as long as there are stalls then what is the big deal.
that means as long as there are stalls she should be able to use the girls room, no matter how the other girls may feel? correct?
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Grovit
then what is the problem with using the boys bathrom?
Because of the OBVIOUS gender difference, biology be damned!
Interesting. Can you point out the biology involved here? Genetic or otherwise?
originally posted by: Grovit
originally posted by: NavyDoc
That's a valid point. Why does one person's set of feelings trump everybody else's set of feelings. The answer is that in our current politically correct society, only certain feelings that line up with the program are valid and everything else is "bigoted."
thats what i am seeing to.
right away im a bigot because i stated my opinion that she is a boy, which happens to be a fact.
originally posted by: windword
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Grovit
then what is the problem with using the boys bathrom?
Because of the OBVIOUS gender difference, biology be damned!
Interesting. Can you point out the biology involved here? Genetic or otherwise?
I'm not sure what you're asking here? Do you mean boobs and balls?
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Grovit
well, for the record i can see why she would be uncomfortable using the boys room. i get it.
your the one that said something to the effect that as long as there are stalls then what is the big deal.
that means as long as there are stalls she should be able to use the girls room, no matter how the other girls may feel? correct?
I believe that those opposed to sharing their restroom facilities suffer from the "ICK" factor, while the "need" of the transgender folks to use the bathroom that their gender identifies with is a matter of privacy and personal safety.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: windword
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Grovit
then what is the problem with using the boys bathrom?
Because of the OBVIOUS gender difference, biology be damned!
Interesting. Can you point out the biology involved here? Genetic or otherwise?
I'm not sure what you're asking here? Do you mean boobs and balls?
You are the one who brought up biology. What biology do you refer to? Genotype? Phenotype?
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Grovit
well, for the record i can see why she would be uncomfortable using the boys room. i get it.
your the one that said something to the effect that as long as there are stalls then what is the big deal.
that means as long as there are stalls she should be able to use the girls room, no matter how the other girls may feel? correct?
I believe that those opposed to sharing their restroom facilities suffer from the "ICK" factor, while the "need" of the transgender folks to use the bathroom that their gender identifies with is a matter of privacy and personal safety.
So basically you disregard the feelings of one as being invalid and the exact same feelings of another as being valid as long as you can justify it in your own mind?
originally posted by: windword
because you refuse to let "her" out of the blue boy box that you think she should remain in, insisting that her biology is more important in your world view than her perception of her femininity.
See?
originally posted by: windword
I believe that those opposed to sharing their restroom facilities suffer from the "ICK" factor, while the "need" of the transgender folks to use the bathroom that their gender identifies with is a matter of privacy and personal safety.
originally posted by: windword
You worry about discomfort, but how uncomfortable will men be sharing their restroom with a voluptuous fem fatale, whipping out her piece? Wouldn't you men prefer she use the ladies room?
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: Grovit
originally posted by: NavyDoc
That's a valid point. Why does one person's set of feelings trump everybody else's set of feelings. The answer is that in our current politically correct society, only certain feelings that line up with the program are valid and everything else is "bigoted."
thats what i am seeing to.
right away im a bigot because i stated my opinion that she is a boy, which happens to be a fact.
Because leftists use that slur against anyone who doesn't toe the line. It really has gotten overused and old though and really does not mean much than a failed attempt at a discussion and a lame attempt to stifle contradicting views. Alinsky in action, my friend.