It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A new study released Monday found that warming temperatures in Pacific Ocean waters off the coast of North America over the past century closely followed natural changes in the wind, not increases in greenhouse gases related to global warming.
The study compared ocean surface temperatures from 1900 to 2012 to surface air pressure, a stand-in for wind measurements, and found a close match.
Changes in one area cause changes everywhere else. Everything is connected, and everything influences everything else.
For example, rain heats the atmosphere. The warm air rises, creating wind. Wind drives ocean currents. Currents help determine where phytoplankton live. Phytoplankton help determine where clouds are formed. Clouds influences where the atmosphere is heated. Heating determines where the ocean evaporates, and the amount of evaporation.
originally posted by: tavi45
I still don't see how co2 not being the SOLE factor in climate means we should trash the world with zero regard for future generations.
originally posted by: tavi45
I still don't see how co2 not being the SOLE factor in climate means we should trash the world with zero regard for future generations.
originally posted by: tavi45
I still don't see how co2 not being the SOLE factor in climate means we should trash the world with zero regard for future generations.
originally posted by: tavi45
I still don't see how co2 not being the SOLE factor in climate means we should trash the world with zero regard for future generations.
It was greeted with skepticism by several mainstream climate scientists, who questioned how the authors could claim changes in wind direction and velocity were natural and unrelated to climate change.
They pointed out that the study sees a correlation but did not do the rigorous statistical and computer analysis to show that the cause of the wind changes were natural - the kind of analysis done when scientists attribute weather extremes to global warming.
"This may say more about the state of climate modeling than it says about causes of warming in the Pacific Northwest," Ken Caldeira, an atmospheric scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science's Department of Global Ecology, said in an email. "The authors ... have not established the causes of these atmospheric pressure variations. Thus, claims that the observed temperature increases are due primarily to `natural' processes are suspect and premature, at best."
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: tavi45
I still don't see how co2 not being the SOLE factor in climate means we should trash the world with zero regard for future generations.
But what if "climate change" is 100% due to natural Earth change?
I think any "excess" (if any) CO2 is not a contributing factor.
The "Earth" takes it back and uses it naturally.
Where do you suppose the CO2 that animals exhale comes from? The answer is plants. Plants turn CO2 from the atmosphere into food. Animals turn some of that food back into CO2 (and flesh, and poop). Carbon is recycled. It's balanced.
CO2 is exhaled by all breathing animals. So unless you kill of either most of the humans or most of the animals you will not reduce CO2.
There is no lack of oxygen and we can't plant enough trees to take care of the excess CO2 produced by burning fossil fuels.
The answer would be to plant more trees and other plants that take in CO2 and put out Oxygen.