Amaterur Astronomer Detect a UFO Exiting from a Lunar Crater...

a reply to: butcherguy

I don't know... I'm not up to date with interstellar migration routes.

All joking aside, since we discovered life forms almost everywhere, without sunlight, or oxygen.
Crabs walking and fish swimming on 300 Celsius degree liquid acid.. etc..
I wouldn't be that much surprised if something could live in a (partial) vacuum.

Didn't a bug or mosquito survived on the outside of the space-shuttle?


Even some space footage showing (disputed) movement.. It sometimes remind me more of biological movement and behavior as mechanics.

But of-course all speculation and observation.

Nevertheless, ruling something out immediately is the easy and no fun way out.

a reply to: butcherguy

You do know that algae was discovered on the ISS right?

a reply to: Arken

So lets see HUBBLE WITH A 2.4MTR mirror above the atmosphere can resolve objects 300 ft across at the distance of the Moon and YOU believe this BS claim ROFLMAO!

Arken PLEASE learn something about imaging/optics etc because you just look kind of silly if you get taken in by youtube idiots!

I have to admit, the crater just below and to the right of where the supposed UFO comes from has something right in the middle of it, Could be part of the crater, but what I find strange is the shadow it is creating, looks to be very tall

a reply to: Glassbender777

I noticed that too. Judging by its shadow

a reply to: Arken
Col!!! Finally something real...

All of yall that are saying "CGI"; I presume you can prove that...

It is real easy for those who know little to nothing about CGI to make the claim that a video is faked. It is far more difficult to actually fake such a video. And, of course, it is impossible (usually) to tell just by "looking", unless you know what to look for, and again, most folk don't.

I would challenge any of the "CGI sayers" to offer some evidence to support their claim. And in support of the video I would offer the atmospheric distortion, the lighting effects on the craft, and of course it's shadow.

And in support of the CGi crowd; software to produce that quality of CGI starts at $3500.00. I'd like to think that One cold use something like Poser ($500), but I've bee a poser user for years, and that would be difficult, painstaking, and time consuming...

a reply to: wmd_2008

So lets see HUBBLE WITH A 2.4MTR mirror above the atmosphere can resolve objects 300 ft across at the distance of the Moon

I'm not sure what that has to do with this particular clip.

Arken PLEASE learn something about imaging/optics etc because you just look kind of silly if you get taken in by youtube idiots!

Why no spoilers? If you know the reason for this "anomaly" then why not spill it? Don't leave us hanging.

CGI for sure
What gives it away easy is that the frame rate of the moon footage don't follow the frame rate of the ufo

originally posted by: SyxPak
a reply to: Arken

Good Post Arken! Without digging deeper, this looks pretty interesting. What I find Interesting as well is the Object in the Crater just to the lower right of the Crater in Question!! What the Hell is That?!? Curious Minds want to Know!!!

drive.google.com...
most likely just material left over from the impact that caused the crater like in these ones. This photo was taken with a cellphone camera and a 6" telescope. Its how I know the person who took this video wasn't using a 12" one this is half the size of his.

GlassBender, and FlySolo, Yah That's why I posted that it is one strange image in that crater!! Almost looks like a tower of sorts with a gantry or bridge extending outwards. Odd Indeed!!! On my end, it is a structure not of natural origin. But who am I.
I have a small scope here and have seen a couple tower structures just when the light is right on the moon. Usually when it it is like half moon status. Then looking right on the edge of where the light and dark meet, the towers show up way up by the top of the moon. Down just a little. They come up at a 'V' angle from one another.
When moon is full, it is way to bright for my scope to see these 'towers'...... Just sayin...... Syx.

a reply to: SyxPak

pics of that would be cool.

Since I actually saw a saucer shape flying disk once, I find this very interesting..

The one I saw was during the daytime, clear blue skies. I just happened to be in a reclining position, looking up, and watched it as it silently and slowly moved across the sky. Then it went straight up until it was no longer visible.

a reply to: ChehystPewpur

While I appreciate your reply, I have seen 'normal' junk in the middle of craters, from impact, said by those posting such pics, but does that really look like 'normal' impact ejecta to You? It seems to be too constructed and mechanical, like our buildings, to be just natural matter from an impact. Thanx for the image too! Syx.

a reply to: FlySolo

Yes I agree. I haven't seen these for a year or so as we moved and I have not even had my scope out since. But as soon as I can get my act together, I will try to set up and get a shot or two. Probably in a month or so, or this winter when we get Very clear skies from the cold. That would be the best time to grab some fairly clear images! Writin a post-it now so I hopefully don't forget! LOL!!

originally posted by: SyxPak
GlassBender, and FlySolo, Yah That's why I posted that it is one strange image in that crater!! Almost looks like a tower of sorts with a gantry or bridge extending outwards. Odd Indeed!!! On my end, it is a structure not of natural origin. But who am I.
I have a small scope here and have seen a couple tower structures just when the light is right on the moon. Usually when it it is like half moon status. Then looking right on the edge of where the light and dark meet, the towers show up way up by the top of the moon. Down just a little. They come up at a 'V' angle from one another.
When moon is full, it is way to bright for my scope to see these 'towers'...... Just sayin...... Syx.

Sorry but even his 12 inch scope can't show what you would call real detail look at my post above even the Hubble with it's 8 foot mirror can just resolve objects 300ft across on the Moon, iphones and tiny telescopes can only show objects KM across so NATURAL.

originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: butcherguy

You do know that algae was discovered on the ISS right?

Yes, but I am not sure that it was shown to be propagating. Bacteria can be found on spacecraft in LEO. I don't know of any biological entities that flap wings or otherwise move through the vacuum of space. The whole wing flapping notion is a bit absurd anyway. There is no medium to flap wings or fins through, as in a gas or liquid.

a reply to: wmd_2008

Hi. I reread your above post and would agree. But who are we to say that structures cannot be built to Extreme sizes on the moon? There supposedly is WAY less gravity there to hamper buildings, and other structures being constructed of Maximum Sizes!!! SO if this is imaged to be miles across, I say it can be done. How well these items are imaged is of no matter. It is the fact of their existance, or not, that I am talking about. I see hand made structure. I see natural impact matter as well in a Lot of images of the moon. So I am definitely on the side of , Yes, There are Structures on the Moon.
I don't want to keep taking attention away from the subject matter of Arkens Original Post. I find the craft leaving could be a very large one, if indeed real. Kinda back to, who is to say how large things can be built up there?

I wanted this to be true, but alas I suspect CGI...AGAIN.

I didn't see a shadow to match the movement, and it's movement after it's exit is zig zaggy and unstable.
I theorize that a large ship, which this would have to be, would have a more stable flight path than zig zags which would be thousands of feet per split second to pull off.

I don't think any entity in the universe would fly a ship that unstable, or create one.

I also think videos with CGI do the most damage to an UFO research. I think the people that do it are scumbags.

originally posted by: Spacespider
CGI for sure
What gives it away easy is that the frame rate of the moon footage don't follow the frame rate of the ufo

Exactly. I put together a video demonstrating this fact. Secureteam (Tyler Glockner is his name) is so insecure that he filed a false copyright complaint with youtube to take my video down for daring to expose this fact.
www.youtube.com...
This was commentary and criticism, protected as fair use under copyright law. I have filed a counter notice contesting the claim and he now has 14 days to either sue me in Federal court and deliver the suit to the law agency I used for the counter claim as well as YouTube, or else my video will be restored. If he goes through with it and sues me I will counter sue him for the damage he has done to my channel; by filing a false copyright complaint for what is fair use commentary and criticism, he is preventing me from doing any live webcasts with my channel until the matter is resolved. YouTube has disabled my ability to do live webcasts for the next 6 months as a result of the copyright strike, and that is the primary purpose of my channel, Astronomy Live. When he either fails to respond or I win the action against him in court, YouTube will then restore my ability to do my webcasts. He is attempting to abuse the youtube DMCA system to silence dissent, which further proves his dishonesty. Here is a copy of my video that someone else mirrored on their channel:

ETA: I rewatched it and it's not the ship that's zig zagging, it's the camera movement. My bad. My theory of CGI went back a step.

If this is 'real' then I would put a camera 24/7 non stop on that crater and archive all video. If the "astronomer' doesn't do THAT, he's full of it. Time will tell.