It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ketsuko
reply to post by tothetenthpower
You could make the argument that a society that robs so much from its citizens that they cannot afford to have as many children as they might like is an immoral one, seeing as how taxation is basically legalized theft and burdensome taxation becomes an immorality of its own.
xuenchen
Welllllll..
What seems to be causing the 100+ million cases of STD's ?
Something ain't right somewhere.
tothetenthpower
reply to post by xuenchen
What seems to be causing the 100+ million cases of STD's ?
Gee lets see.
Maybe it's the lack of sex education in schools?
Or the selling of sex to everybody via advertising, yet telling young men and women they are wrong and immoral for pursuing sex during the times they should learning about such things?
Maybe it's the economic decay of the middle class, forcing more and more people to take jobs that pay nothing for work that is far too strenuous.
There are a VARIETY of reasons why America is in decline and it certainly has nothing to do with morals.
~Tenth
BubbaJoe
xuenchen
Welllllll..
What seems to be causing the 100+ million cases of STD's ?
Something ain't right somewhere.
I would blame the religious right that do not want to teach their children about sex, and don't seem to remember what it is like to be a horny teen. "Don't do that honey", it didn't work 100 years ago, and doesn't work now. Abstinence only education has been proved to fail, but time and time again, some evangelical bunch of yahoos comes out to defend it.
xuenchen
BubbaJoe
xuenchen
Welllllll..
What seems to be causing the 100+ million cases of STD's ?
Something ain't right somewhere.
I would blame the religious right that do not want to teach their children about sex, and don't seem to remember what it is like to be a horny teen. "Don't do that honey", it didn't work 100 years ago, and doesn't work now. Abstinence only education has been proved to fail, but time and time again, some evangelical bunch of yahoos comes out to defend it.
Actually I'm sure the RR has an effect.
But if the offspring of the RR were going off course so to speak in great numbers, they would have gotten off that road by now.
It's been several generations.
And there ain't a 100 million RR I don't think.
But don't those have an effect on morals in general? [
tothetenthpower
In a way yes, there are things that we can all agree are moral or immoral, like killing somebody, or hurting children for example.
~Tenth
ketsuko
reply to post by BubbaJoe
I received abstinence only ... somehow, it worked pretty well for me. They taught all sorts of stuff about sex and STDs and at every step of the way, they drove home the message that no matter how safe our sex was, what birth control methods we used (and they taught all of them), the only 100% method was not to do it in the first place - you know, abstinence.
Of course, I'm sure you would have found it substandard because they didn't actually teach us all the techniques for pleasuring each other, but I don't think that's necessary. There should be some mystery to sex, some discovery.
Riffrafter
reply to post by xuenchen
"Blah, blah, blah...STD....blah, blah, blah..."
Jeez...
moral relativist.
ketsuko
reply to post by BubbaJoe
So because you knew some folks who were Christians on Sunday and did whatever they wanted the rest of the week, you think that's what the rest of us are like? Hokey, dokey ...