It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
civpop
Hmm sealed evidence fishier and fishier by the minute.
Now for an interesting piece of information that does not appear to have been considered in detail. A pilot on PPRUNE pointed out that there are two different modes of operation of the 777 flight management computer. A programmed route will take a straight line (great circle) route to the next programmed waypoint, but if there is no longer any waypoint in the computer, then the plane will fly on a magnetic bearing. While this is not material around Malaysia, it becomes highly significant in the Southern Ocean.
As a result, a magnetic heading would need to start out going significantly further west (and would also fly much further) to end up at the same point as a great circle route.
It is easy to see that in combination with Jeff Wise’s chart of the ping lines, a magnetic bearing heading is highly unlikely to have resulted in the 3.11am ping arc lying outside the 2.11am ping arc. Once this is realized, the hypothesis that the plane suffered an accident that left it flying on autopilot becomes rather less likely than the plane being deliberately directed towards a part of the southern ocean where presumably whoever was in charge believed the aircraft would never be found.
Indeed the NTSB tracks appear to implicitly assume an absolute not a magnetic heading, so would require the plane to be flying in a pre-programmed direction. Of course we need to see the ping arcs themselves (or at least get absolute confirmation about the trend in the ping arcs) before reaching a definitive conclusion, but this issue appears quite significant for any assessment of what might have happened onboard MH370.
Link
Vasa Croe
civpop
Hmm sealed evidence fishier and fishier by the minute.
Sealed evidence being the communications with the plane. Sounds like this is headed towards the scenario mentioned about the pilot hijacking the plane to try to help a political figure. If that is true then I am sure they would not want to release the info. This particular hijacking could very well start a small war if this is the case.
Myrtales Instinct
Sealed?
Hmmm..... early on the didn't the Malaysian government say this was a threat to their national security?
If you add the two together it implies they've known from the get-go what was up.
Interesting.
UKGuy1805
Just un earhed abit more info that may be of interest -
I assumed the Hex code(plane identity) that is broadcast through the transponder, was not easily changed and at best would require an experienced team of avionics specialists? Apparently Not, the hex code can and apparently is changed even in the cockpit by the crews.
So this adds another factor to things and posts the question - was MH370 flight information changed delibratly in the cockpit, could it then have re-appeared as a different flight number and hex code?
UKGuy1805
Just un earhed abit more info that may be of interest -
I assumed the Hex code(plane identity) that is broadcast through the transponder, was not easily changed and at best would require an experienced team of avionics specialists? Apparently Not, the hex code can and apparently is changed even in the cockpit by the crews.
So this adds another factor to things and posts the question - was MH370 flight information changed delibratly in the cockpit, could it then have re-appeared as a different flight number and hex code?
rockflier
Here is what US pilots are expected to do for lost Comms. FAA Lost Comms Procedures
Zaphod58
reply to post by BobAthome
Because you can't hack a commercial plane. Even if you could the pilots can override the computer, or reboot it, and at that point they're back in control of the plane.
Zaphod58
reply to post by Daughter2
I am quite aware of black projects. I have a lot more information on them than the average person. Person A hacks the airplane. Pilot B, notices that the plane is not doing what it's supposed to do. Pilot C goes to the circuit breaker panel and pulls the flight computer circuit breaker. Person A is now locked out of the computer, because it's powered down. Oh look. Hack resolved. It's that simple.
But hell, what do I know about planes. I only spent the first 3/4ths of my life around them working on them. I guess I really don't know crap about it.edit on 3/27/2014 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)
www.flightglobal.com...
“There is a need in the industry for a technique that conclusively prevents unauthorised persons for gaining access to the controls of the vehicle and therefore threatening the safety of the passengers onboard the vehicle, and/or other people in the path of travel of the vehicle, thereby decreasing the amount of destruction individuals onboard the vehicle would be capable of causing,” the patent authors write. “In particular, there is a need for a technique that ensures the continuation of the desired path of travel of a vehicle by removing any type of human decision process that may be influenced by the circumstances of the situation, including threats or further violence onboard the vehicle.”