It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Earth can raise shields to protect itself against solar storms. For the first time, satellites and ground-based detectors have watched as the planet sends out a tendril of plasma to fight off blasts of charged solar matter. The discovery confirms a long-standing theory about Earth's magnetic surroundings and offers us a way to keep track of the planet's defences.
"It's changed our thinking about how the system operates," says Joe Borovsky at the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado, who was not involved in the research. "Earth doesn't just sit there and take whatever the solar wind gives it, it can actually fight back."
Theory had suggested that an extra-strong electric field from the sun can rip plasma away from the plasmasphere during reconnection, triggering a plume. If this plume reaches the boundary between the earthly and solar magnetic fields, it would create a buffer zone of dense material. This would make it harder for magnetic field lines to meet up and spark further reconnection.
Not every solar storm generates a plasma plume, which means ground-based observations will continue to be vital for understanding the phenomenon.
done. but it was a short article.
cody599
That's actually an interesting read
You should bulk up your OP with a quote, to generate more interest IMHO
Cody
swanne
reply to post by stormbringer1701
It's not an "attack and defence" phenomena per say - it's more equivalent of: "When I fill a bottle with water, and the bottle gets full, the overflow will flow out of the bottle". The bottle doesn't fight back, it just blocks further income of water.
Additionally, not all "attacks from the Sun" results in the "firing" of "photon torpedoes":
Not every solar storm generates a plasma plume, which means ground-based observations will continue to be vital for understanding the phenomenon.
Seems to me like a way for researchers to ask for even more funds from taxpayers...
edit on 7-3-2014 by swanne because: (no reason given)
SLAYER69
No Klingons or Romulans
Interesting read though. Thanks
Arnie123
If it goes towards science and a better understanding on how things work and interact, why not? or you prefer more weapons of war? which I'm for also, but its time to give it a rest and see how our fragile planet is doing.
swanne
Seems to me like a way for researchers to ask for even more funds from taxpayers...
edit on 7-3-2014 by swanne because: (no reason given)
stormbringer1701
but these observations were made by existing ground stations and equipment in the course of their normal studies. nor did i see any overt argument made for additional funding or resources.
swanne
reply to post by stormbringer1701
It's not an "attack and defence" phenomena per say - it's more equivalent of: "When I fill a bottle with water, and the bottle gets full, the overflow will flow out of the bottle". The bottle doesn't fight back, it just blocks further income of water.
Theory had suggested that an extra-strong electric field from the sun can rip plasma away from the plasmasphere during reconnection, triggering a plume. If this plume reaches the boundary between the earthly and solar magnetic fields, it would create a buffer zone of dense material. This would make it harder for magnetic field lines to meet up and spark further reconnection.
It's just a natural and predictable accumulation of dense material. It's not really an attack to the Sun... it's more of a traffic jam.
Additionally, not all "attacks from the Sun" results in the "firing" of "photon torpedoes":
Not every solar storm generates a plasma plume, which means ground-based observations will continue to be vital for understanding the phenomenon.
Seems to me like a way for researchers to ask for even more funds from taxpayers...
edit on 7-3-2014 by swanne because: (no reason given)