posted on Aug, 25 2003 @ 04:53 PM
Originally posted by e-nonymous
hmmm the same reason why convicted felons are given parole officers. to make sure they stay in line. ........
Ah yes .... ufortunatley wrong answer. While we DO have control over our OWN felon's, it's not OUR place to LIE about another country that we have
NO power over as it is NOT our country. We DON'T have to keep "tabs" nor goto war under the banner of lie's. Saddam has no WMD's and I'm VERY
surprised some people think he does ... Correct me if I'm wrong, but this whole war started because we HAD PROOF OF WMD'S ... where the hell are
they then? Oh ... right, very well hidden. So well hidden that we KNOW he has them, just not where .... give me a friggan break
This whole BS is nothing more then bush showing daddy how strong he is or some other BS like that
well all i'm going to say is this...
there is ZERO proof that the WMD he openly declared to the UN 12 years ago was destroyed therefore we must conclude they still exist SOMEWHERE. they
dont just disappear. and you dont take a known liars word for it that he got rid of them as ordered as he had not fully complied with anything asked
of him before. while you want to assume that there are none i know things do not disappear into thin air. strange how he openly declared them, they
were even documented by weapons inspectors and yet you just KNOW they arent there. all gone! do you believe he actually destroyed them? remember,
containers cant just disappear into thin air so they had to go somewhere and since noone in the iraqi regime offered proof and basically said they
werent going to either how can you prove this "fact" that you know they dont exist if there is no proof to back this up? i have documentation from
the UN itself showing he had stockpiles of all kinds of chemical weapons, they existed, they were there. and until there is proof they were destroyed
they must still exist.
but like i have been saying all along he had so much time to play three card monte while inspectors werent looking that they could be anywhere at this
i find it strange that if he did get rid of them he didnt offer any proof. while you demand proof they were there (which is already documented by the
UN itself) i dont see you demanding proof they ewre actually destroyed, you just "know" they arent there. well if they arent there and there is no
proof yet that they were destroyed where did it all go? did he give them to jordan and and palestinians as xmas presents??? probably but highly
if he did get rid of them fine but i at least want proof of that but there is still more documentation proving he had them than there is proof he got
rid of them.
[Edited on 25-8-2003 by ThePrankMonkey]