It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The argument over why this ad won’t make it to the airwaves goes like this: Daniel Defense attempted to buy Super Bowl ad time in several local media markets in November. Most of the markets did not accept it and the response from one station in Little Rock, Ark., is still pending.
A Fox Station in their home state Atlanta, Ga., told Daniel Defense in an email, “Unfortunately we cannot accept your commercial spots in Football / Super Bowl due to the rules the NFL itself has set into place for your companies [sic] category.”
The NFL says that it never saw the ad and never heard of it before it blew up in conservative media circles last month.
Daniel Defense’s Director of Marketing Jordan Hunter said “This was a branding thing for Daniel Defense definitely but we wanted to create an ad that was a constitutional ad,” he said.
Mianeye
Maybe it's because it dosn't say what to defend against.
It's more saying "You live in fear of the unknown cause we say so, now buy our gun, and be safe".
Don't shoot me, just saying
In 2012, there were an estimated 1,214,462 violent crimes. The violent crimes of murder and non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, and aggravated assault increased 1.1 percent, 0.2 percent, and 1.1 percent, respectively.
Nationwide, there were an estimated 8,975,438 property crimes.
i doubt that the family shown in that commercial, is the ones threadened.
It kind of show the wrong picture of where violent crime is happening, even though it can happen anywhere.
There's no way a pro gun ad was going to find its way into the superbowl this year. Not with the what's gone on with shootings in the last year, and the current administrations push for gun reform in some way or another.
neo96
reply to post by tothetenthpower
There's no way a pro gun ad was going to find its way into the superbowl this year. Not with the what's gone on with shootings in the last year, and the current administrations push for gun reform in some way or another.
And apparently it's 'constitutional free speech' protected free too.
dukeofjive696969
I was more pissed when last year a porn site commercial was not allowed to pass during the superbowl.
Now that was sad , a political statement about guns, not so much.
we defend our airports....with guns
neo96
reply to post by UxoriousMagnus
we defend our airports....with guns
We defend our airports with a group of perverted,dirty old men, who have guns, and call them the TSA.edit on 1-2-2014 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
UxoriousMagnus
neo96
reply to post by UxoriousMagnus
we defend our airports....with guns
We defend our airports with a group of perverted,dirty old men, who have guns, and call them the TSA.edit on 1-2-2014 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
I didn't think they were armed
The union for Transportation Security Administration workers said on Tuesday that it’s a good idea for some agents to carry weapons at the airport.
“Because of all of the vilification and hatred heaped upon both the agency and our officers … people show up at the airport every day angry before they even meet a TSA officer,” link
Bassago
UxoriousMagnus
neo96
reply to post by UxoriousMagnus
we defend our airports....with guns
We defend our airports with a group of perverted,dirty old men, who have guns, and call them the TSA.edit on 1-2-2014 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
I didn't think they were armed
I don't think they are armed at this point but they certainly want to be.
The union for Transportation Security Administration workers said on Tuesday that it’s a good idea for some agents to carry weapons at the airport.
“Because of all of the vilification and hatred heaped upon both the agency and our officers … people show up at the airport every day angry before they even meet a TSA officer,” link
Probably so they can shoot people who hate and vilify them.