It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But JPMorgan Chase did everything Enron did -- and much, much more. Consider:
A few weeks ago JPM paid $13 billion to settle well-documented charges of massive and widespread foreclosure fraud. Although that was the largest fine paid by a corporation in American history, there's a compelling argument that it should have been larger -- as much as 22 times larger.
JPM paid $296.9 million for lying to investors about the payment status -- and hence, the investment quality -- of its mortgage-backed securities.
JPM paid more than a third of a billion dollars to settle charges that it bilked customers by charging them for credit monitoring services it never provided.
JPM agreed to pay between $1.8 billion and $4.5 billion, depending on how you tally the cost, for illegally foreclosing on American families and throwing them out of their homes.
JPM paid another $56 million for cheating active-duty service members and their families, and for illegally foreclosing on them as well.
JPM paid $228 million for rigging the bidding for 93 municipal bond transactions in 31 states. (You know those cities that supposedly can't honor their pension agreements with retired workers? That's the kind of client they cheated here.)
JPM paid $410 million to settle charges related to its rigging of electricity prices, which is what Enron did.
JPM has paid multiple fines and settlements over the "London whale" case, in which traders sought to manipulate market prices, engaged in unlawful "reckless conduct" (while CEO Dimon bragged about the bank's risk management and "fortress balance sheet"), then unlawfully concealed their behavior. There is no evidence that any investigation sought to determine how high the cover-up went. We do know that Dimon told investors the case was "a tempest in a teapot" after privately being told that losses were running in the billions.
JPM paid $1.2 billion for colluding with credit card companies and other institutions to rig merchants' credit prices.
JPM has paid two major fines for illegally investing with customers' money.
J.P. Morgan’s Environmental Markets business is committed to helping clients address the present and future challenges of a carbon-constrained environment. A leader in the compliance markets, the firm’s capabilities span the sales and trading of carbon credits globally.
Sales, Trading & Risk Management
J.P. Morgan’s Environmental Markets trading desk is one of the leading market makers in exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) environmental products, including European Union Allowances (EUAs) and Certified Emission Reductions (CERs). For these commodities, the firm offers swaps, options and investor structures to help clients better manage their exposure to environmental risk. In addition, the global scale of J.P. Morgan’s trading platform supports the firm’s ability to manage risk across all regions and offer dynamic pricing to our clients.
it's the commissions.
xuenchen
reply to post by boncho
The way I understand it is that the carbon brokers would fund both sides of the issue but with more going to the most controversial side.
That way the market stays active.
No way would they attempt to kill off the whole global warming swarms.
So I would think they would always give the illusion of supporting the cause.
Big money cashes in.
Al Gore is involved with the bankers also, IMO.
But thanks to a combination of public-records requests and contracts that are available online, here’s what we do know: 18 of the 24 states JP Morgan handles have been contracted to pay the bank up to $560,492,596.02 since 2004. Since 2007, Florida has been contracted to pay JP Morgan $90,351,202.22. Pennsylvania’s seven-year contract totaled $112,541,823.27. New York’s seven-year contract totaled $126,394,917.
These contracts are transactional contracts, meaning they are amendable based on changes in program participation. Each month, the three companies that administer EBT receive a small fee that can range from $.31 to $2.30 (or higher depending upon the number of welfare services on an EBT card and state contractual requirements) for each SNAP recipient.
HawkeyeNation
Great read and thanks for bringing this to my attention. Sooo...my retirement thru work is invested thru JPM. How concerned should I be with that? I honestly don't have much knowledge with investing and all that so if you have any input that would be great.
ChaoticOrder
Holy hell... it absolutely boggles my mind how they can afford to pay all those huge fines and still remain afloat. I guess that is what bail outs are for huh? They get the money back at the end of the day.
boncho
What does JP Morgan have to do with global warming? Whether or not they made money off policies related to it, doesn't mean it supports or disproves global warming.
With that logic you could take the (x) amount of other means they illegally made money and make the same nonsensical conclusions.
bobs_uruncle
boncho
What does JP Morgan have to do with global warming? Whether or not they made money off policies related to it, doesn't mean it supports or disproves global warming.
With that logic you could take the (x) amount of other means they illegally made money and make the same nonsensical conclusions.
These "captains" of industry who have all the money are to be trusted with the health of the planet through/with carbon taxes when they are constantly committing federal crimes as well as crimes against humanity? Who else has the financial where-with-all to fix this alleged problem, and don't say a government, they are all broke or in barely manageable deficit positions?
Cheers - Dave
boncho
bobs_uruncle
boncho
What does JP Morgan have to do with global warming? Whether or not they made money off policies related to it, doesn't mean it supports or disproves global warming.
With that logic you could take the (x) amount of other means they illegally made money and make the same nonsensical conclusions.
These "captains" of industry who have all the money are to be trusted with the health of the planet through/with carbon taxes when they are constantly committing federal crimes as well as crimes against humanity? Who else has the financial where-with-all to fix this alleged problem, and don't say a government, they are all broke or in barely manageable deficit positions?
Cheers - Dave
Government and business go hand in hand. But how is it different than any other issue they are corrupt on? China has had major reforms with corruption in building practices and now environment is becoming a concern (since the west sent all their toxic waste intensive industries there…) so a modicum of change has happened in a very corrupt climate.
So to have other places.
Saying business and government won't yield any positive action simply means you have the wrong businesses and government in power. And forget "free market" because business today is completely engrained into legislative powers and politics. (Not that it wasn't in the past, but to a different degree.)
Maluhia
JP Morgan also makes a lot of money in the food stamp business and the more participants ... the more they make. How convenient.