 |
|
Topic started on 20-11-2004 @ 08:49 AM by jsobecky
|
Last Thursday, John Kerry offered the opinion that it was the Osama bin Laden tapes that resulted in his defeat, because the American electorate was
afraid after viewing the video:
 Sen. John Kerry believes the videotape of Osama bin Laden that appeared days before the Nov. 2 election cost him the presidency, Fox News
reported yesterday.
The Massachusetts Democrat told Fox News the tape first aired by Arab television network Al Jazeera may have scared the American
electorate. 
Videotape
Was this a master stroke by Karl Rove? Or a plan that backfired on bin Laden? OR...exactly what bin Laden wanted to happen?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 01:57 PM by duh squared
|
I think I am going with irrelevant here, Jsobecky. It seemed to me that the decided Kerry voters felt it even more necessary to "vote Bush out" when
the OBL video aired. Bush voters may have felt that it was not a good time for a different president, or that Kerry would not be able to handle the
job.
I really don't know if the undecideds were prompted to vote Bush as a result of the video. They could have taken the video either way.
A friend of mine who really doesn't keep up with current events/news or politics (but would be put in the category of liberal, lifestyle wise) called
me and said "I heard about that Bin Laden video. If Bush wins were F'd..stay off the subways if he does!" I use this as an example of how the
terror-reality-check just made people feel more strongly about the candidate they already were supporting. Many of the more liberal people feel that
Bush is making the US less safe, while many republicans felt that Kerry would have.
Now, Mr Kerry, while I voted for you, I think if there is anyone to blame your loss on it would be yourself and Mr Schrum for a campaign that did not
enable the public to get a feel of who you were until the last couple months before election. I say get yourself a campaign wiz of a manager, stay in
the public eye for the next 4 years, and try again in 2008.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 02:01 PM by dgtempe
|
Of course the tape was to Bush's advantage. Dont you know Osama would do anything to help his friend?
Kerry is absolutely right.
This was Rove's bouncing baby boy surprise. And people swallowed it up with no water.
Fools.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 02:24 PM by Flange Gasket
|
The Saudi's have approximately 700 billion invested in America, a little speech from Osama Bin Laden, and it's four more years in the Whitehouse for
the Oil lobby.
Imagine how much that would have cost to buy publicity like that...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 02:31 PM by spacedoubt
|
I think it's Kerry not being able to FATHOM the fact that he lost.
His supporters feel the same way, so I think he was looking for sympathy by saying that, about the tape..
Let's also NOT forget that Kerry was the second-string candidate for the Democrats, after their "starter" blew a vocal chord on stage..!
I don't think it's much deeper than just him being a sore loser..
[Edited on 20-11-2004 by spacedoubt]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 02:45 PM by jsobecky
|
That was my feeling also. I was curious as to how he would comment upon his loss, given a few weeks to reflect upon it. He apparently thought it was
neck and neck until that moment. He was deluded, thinking that one single event caused his loss. The bin Laden tape didn't even cause much of a
ripple.
IMO, the Republicans were fairly gentle on him. I can think of several things off the top of my head that, if put into a commercial, would have sunk
him like a rock.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 02:55 PM by Pisky
|
As soon as I heard of the tape, I knew that it would give Bush a boost. Even his own people said that it was perfect timing.
They just missed off one thing - "I am Osama bin Laden and I approve this message'
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 03:16 PM by Majic
|
Instead of accepting the obvious: that more Americans thought Bush was a better candidate than Kerry, Democrats continue to come up with all sorts of
increasingly whacked-out alternative theories, and the Republicans can hardly contain their glee that the Democrats are doing so.
The subtext of all of them is that the American electorate is stupid and easily manipulated.
In truth, Kerry has no one to blame but himself for his defeat. Bush was, in many ways, a sitting duck. America was ready for a better alternative.
Unfortunately, Kerry wasn't it.
Seeing Kerry make comments like this tells me we made the right choice. If he isn't man enough to accept responsibility for the outcome of his
campaign, and if he truly holds the electorate in such contempt, then he has no business being President.
We've already elected a "blame America first" president: Jimmy Carter. For those old enough to remember his presidency, it should be obvious why we
don't want to see a repeat performance.
I have voted for Democrats in the past, but I did not this time and have no plans to do so in the future. Why? Because I won't vote for anyone who
calls me an idiot.
Only an idiot would do that.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 04:50 PM by dgtempe
|
Originally posted by spacedoubt
I think it's Kerry not being able to FATHOM the fact that he lost.
His supporters feel the same way, so I think he was looking for sympathy by saying that, about the tape..
[Edited on 20-11-2004 by spacedoubt]  Space, Kerry bowed out extremely gracefully, if you asked me. Inspite of all his lawyers, etc, and
inspite of all the questionable problems with the votes, again, he handed it immediately over to Bush. These are not the actions of a sore loser.
Its also ok for Kerry to try to figure out what went wrong and how it went wrong.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 10:27 PM by spacedoubt
|
Dgtempe,
I agree about him bowing out, the way you explained.
There may just be some inner torment going on.
I think he wants a big partisan "hug" so to speak...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 01:25 AM by dcgolf
|
Actually felt the tape favored Kerry. I almost changed my vote to Kerry because of the tape. In my opinion, it was clear OBL wanted Kerry to be
President. I felt he was threatening the US if we elected Bush. In the end, I wouldn't let him sway my vote.
In my opinion, Kerry is just giving an excuse as to why he lost. That way, he can run again in 2008. I do have to admit, though, he did handle it
very well.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 08:31 AM by fusion360
|
People expected this to swing for Kerry, because it would remind the American people that once again OBL is still alive and kickin. Hoewever it
probably had a side-effect that because of this video, Americans should vote for the stronger Terrorism candidate to get this man. So Bush got the
video factor in this one.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 09:12 AM by SkipShipman
|
Yes it is the actual physical vote, not the computer bytes that matters. The bin Laden tape is just another obfuscation. Kerry won the election but
not the actual count which consists of computer bytes.
How did this happen anyway? Why are there no objections by democrats?
Well maybe it suits them fine, since we can assume they will have their elections appropriately rigged at another time. Power however that derives
itself from the consent of the computer and its manipulation is neither broad based support, nor anything other than a convenient fiction bolstered by
propaganda.
Kerry of course is going along with everything, by design. The phony Osama bin Laden tape is simply another diversion. Go research this on your own.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 01:33 PM by Shadowtrooper90
|
Originally posted by Majic
Instead of accepting the obvious: that more Americans thought Bush was a better candidate than Kerry, Democrats continue to come up with all sorts of
increasingly whacked-out alternative theories, and the Republicans can hardly contain their glee that the Democrats are doing so.
The subtext of all of them is that the American electorate is stupid and easily manipulated.
In truth, Kerry has no one to blame but himself for his defeat. Bush was, in many ways, a sitting duck. America was ready for a better alternative.
Unfortunately, Kerry wasn't it.
Seeing Kerry make comments like this tells me we made the right choice. If he isn't man enough to accept responsibility for the outcome of his
campaign, and if he truly holds the electorate in such contempt, then he has no business being President.
We've already elected a "blame America first" president: Jimmy Carter. For those old enough to remember his presidency, it should be obvious why we
don't want to see a repeat performance.
I have voted for Democrats in the past, but I did not this time and have no plans to do so in the future. Why? Because I won't vote for anyone who
calls me an idiot.
Only an idiot would do that.

It's all part of the socialists' superiority complex: that they're smart, we're stupid, and they should be elected, no questions asked, because
Republicans are stupid frat boys. No wonder they lost.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 02:20 PM by MaskedAvatar
|
It's a piece of crap from Fox.
Any person who buys into any theory of what "lost" the election without cognizance of the FOI requests and reviews in 300+ vote-tampered counties is
ignoring this site's motto too.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 07:16 PM by dgtempe
|
Deny Ignorance?  
How about some of you spread some between two slices of wheat toast?
I'm hungry.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-11-2004 @ 03:12 AM by outsider
|
We did have a couple threads on ATS about this & I'd have to say Bin Laden did help GW get elected. Whether he did that intentionally is up for
speculation. The more interesting part is why Kerry would be willing to even talk about this.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-11-2004 @ 03:23 AM by Thomas Crowne
|
I absolutely love it! Kerry basically admits that we all know he'd be a cowardly wartime president.
Did it ever occur to John, in the quiet of the wee hours of the morning, that it might be that in the end, most of us realized that even though we all
have issues with Dubya, we saw no need in getting into a worse situation?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-11-2004 @ 08:15 AM by FlyersFan
|
Originally posted by spacedoubt
I think it's Kerry not being able to FATHOM the fact that he lost.
His supporters feel the same way, so I think he was looking
for sympathy by saying that, about the tape..

I agree with you 100%. Kerry lost because of ..... KERRY
(and maybe a bit because of Terry Kerry too  )
He never closed the deal. It was him. It was his famous
flip flops. It was his making a bid deal out of being in
Vietnam for four months ... and then complaining because
everyone was talking about his actions in Vietnam. It was
him snobbily ordering specialty Green Tea for breakfast when
he was in the midwest instead of just having the Liptons which
was the only tea on the menu. (he got some funny looks on that
one!) It was Kerry's Senate voting record (what little there is of
it since he didn't show up most of the time) and the fact that he
voted against our defense every single time.
Those folks who talk of the UBL tape as being Carl Roves
doing ...  Bet you are the same folks who were
absolutely sure that the Republican party had UBL locked
up somewhere and that they were going to 'catch him' two
weeks before the election.
The UBL tape did NOTHING to help G.W. win the election. Most
everyone had already decided who they were going to vote for.
If anyone was effected by the UBL tape ... they may have wimped
out and decided to appease UBL and vote Kerry. If anything, the
UBL tape would have helped Kerry ...
But honestly ... It wasn't the tape ... Kerry lost the election because
of himself, and even though his ego can't handle it .... that's the only reason.
I just wish he'd realize no one is listening to him anymore and that
he'd go away. His website is still issuing 'statements' about what
G.W. is doing. No one cares what Kerry says. All eyes are now on
Hillary for the dems. Kerry has already been forgotten.
[edit on 11/22/2004 by FlyersFan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |