It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mary Rose
In addition to verifying Tesla's longitudinal wave, Meyl has discovered a third type of wave, so there are three types of waves:
- The traditional, transverse electromagnetic wave (Hertz)
- Electric longitudinal wave (Tesla)
- Magnetic longitudinal wave (Meyl)
Konstantin Meyl is a German professor who developed a new unified field theory based on the work of Tesla. Meyl’s unified field and particle theory explains quantum and classical physics, mass, gravitation, the constant speed of light, neutrinos, waves and particles, all explained by vortices. The subatomic particle characteristics are accurately calculated by this model. Well known equations are also derived by the unified equation. He provides a kit replicating one of Tesla’s experiments which demonstrates the existence of scalar waves. Scalar waves are simply energy vortices in the form of particles. Here is an interview with Konstantin Meyl on his theory and technologies.
Here are some highlights from the interview:
At the antennae of a transmitter in the near field (a fraction of the wavelength), only scalar waves (potential vortex) exist. They decompose into EM in the far field and further. The near field is not described by Maxwell’s equations and the theory is only postulated. It is possible to pick up only scalar waves from radio transmissions. Receivers which pick up EM waves are actually converting those waves into potential vortices which are conceived as “standing waves.”
The unified field theory describes the electromagnetic, eddy current, potential vortex, and spacial distributions. This combines an extended wave equation with a poisson equation. Maxwell’s equations can be derived as a special case where Gauss’s law for magnetism is not equal to 0. That means that magnetic charges do exist in Meyl’s theory. That electric and magnetic fields are always generated by motion is the fundamental idea which this equation is derived from. The unipolar generator and transformer have conflicting theories under standard theories. Meyl splits them into the equations of transformation of the electric and magnetic fields seperately which describes unipolar induction and the equation of convection, relatively.
Meyl says that the field is always first, which generates particles by decay or conversion. Classical physics does not recognize energy particles aka potential vortices so they were not included in the theory. Quantum physics effectively tried to explain everything with vortices, which is why it is incomplete. The derivation of Schrodinger’s equation from the extended maxwell equations means they are vortices. For example, photons are light as particle vortices and EM light is in wave form which depends on the detection method which can change the form of light.
Gravitation is from the speed of light difference caused by proximity, which proportial to field strength decreases the distance of everything for the field strength. This causes the spin of the earth or other mass to move quicker farther away from the greatest other field influence and thus orbit the sun or larger mass. The closest parts of the bodies have smaller distances because of larger total fields and thus slower speeds of light. These fields are generated by closed field lines of vortices and largely matter. Matter does not move as energy because the speed of light is 0 in the field of the vortex due to infinite field strength within the closed field. The more mass in proximity something has the greater the field strength and the shorter the distances, which causes larger groups of subatomic particles to individually have smaller sizes.
The total field energy in the universe is exactly 0, but particle and energy forms of vortices divide the energy inside and outside the vortex boundary. When particles are destroyed no energy is released. No energy was produced when large amounts of matter was destroyed at MIT with accelerated natreum atoms. This is what Tesla predicted but contradicts Einstein’s E=MC^2. Einstein’s equation is correct as long as the number of subatomic particles is only divided, energy comes from mass defect, not from destruction.
There are kinds of waves. EM which are fields, scalar electric or eddy currents or magnetic vortex which Tesla started with, and magnetic scalar or the potential vortex which Meyl focuses on and is used in nature. EM is fixed at the speed of light at that specific closed field strength. Scalar vortices can be any speed. Neutrinos travel at 1.6c or higher and do not decay to EM. Tesla type scalar are between c and 1.6c and decay at distances proportial to their speed(used in traditional radio near-field). Under the speed c, the scalar vortex acts as an electron.
Black holes may produce and emit neutrinos by condensing and transforming matter into massive fast particles with apparently no mass or charge due to their very high frequency of fluctuation. Neutrinos oscillate in mass and charge. When neutrinos hit matter and have a precise charge or mass they produce one of 3 effects: a gain in mass, a production of EM, or emission of slower neutrinos.
Resonance requires the same frequency, same modulation, and opposite phase angle. Once (scalar)resonance is reached, a direct connection is created from the transmitter to the receiver. Signal and power will pass through a faraday cage.
My notes . . .
Mary Rose
The traditional, transverse electromagnetic wave (Hertz)
Electric longitudinal wave (Tesla)
Magnetic longitudinal wave (Meyl)
There are kinds of waves. EM which are fields, scalar electric or eddy currents or magnetic vortex which Tesla started with, and magnetic scalar or the potential vortex which Meyl focuses on and is used in nature.
I didn't see what is referenced there but the first post is titled:
Mary Rose
Regarding Meyl's unified theory, here is a technology blog post by blogger Mark Zive, "Unified Field Theory Developed by German Professor Meyl."
On the contrary, polygraph measures conductivity and it is known that conductivity changes with temperature (which is affected by spraying with a fire extinguisher), as shown in this resistivity versus temperature graph for copper (resistivity is the inverse of conductivity so it would be the same graph sort of flipped upside down so to speak):
An original polygraph machine which is hooked up to a plant to measures conductivity showed electrical reactions to 2 types of actions. Electronics were kept outside of a shipping container to block EM waves. One action was physical contact by hand or fire extinguisher blast. The other was intent to harm the plant without physical contact. Both showed electrical reaction consistent with a reaction from the plant and other explanations are unknown.
Arbitrageur
Who are you asking?
Mary Rose
Arbitrageur
Who are you asking?
I'm asking everybody.
Put yourself on record.
The first one says nothing about vortices, the second one does so obviously they can't be saying exactly the same thing. My bigger point was, there are more productive things to do than to try to make sense out of nonsense.
Mary Rose
Are those two saying exactly the same thing, or not?
He detected that every vortex has a counterpart, a so-called potential vortex, being able to form matter. He shows that electrons, protons, neutrinos etc. are double vortexes, without needing a postulate.
Now I will tell you what magnetic current is. Magnetic current is the same as electric current is a wrong expression. Really it is not one current, they are two currents, one current is composed of North Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams and the other is composed of South Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams, and they are running one stream against the other stream in whirling, screwlike fashion, and with high speed. One current alone if it be North Pole magnet current or South Pole magnet current it cannot run alone. To run one current will have to run against the other.
What binary vortex systems?
The Cusp
No matter what he called it, what he was attempting to describe does sound very similar to these binary vortex systems.
He detected that every vortex has a counterpart, a so-called potential vortex, being able to form matter. He shows that electrons, protons, neutrinos etc. are double vortexes, without needing a postulate.
Arbitrageur
reply to post by The Cusp
A real vortex forms when you drain a sink full of water, or in a tornado. I haven't seen any discussion of real vortices in this thread. Are you continuing the pseudo-babble by throwing that word around without having any peer-reviewed scientific evidence for what you're talking about? I didn't see any evidence earlier in the thread so referring there doesn't help. Vortex is a popular buzzword for pseudoscience cranks to throw around without understanding what it really is, like "quantum", "frequency", "vibration".
Arbitrageur
reply to post by The Cusp
A real vortex forms when you drain a sink full of water, or in a tornado. I haven't seen any discussion of real vortices in this thread. Are you continuing the pseudo-babble by throwing that word around without having any peer-reviewed scientific evidence for what you're talking about? I didn't see any evidence earlier in the thread so referring there doesn't help. Vortex is a popular buzzword for pseudoscience cranks to throw around without understanding what it really is, like "quantum", "frequency", "vibration".