It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
NewAgeMan
in which case, Earth-like planets would and must then be considered to be an exceedingly rare phenomenon, and are not likely to be discovered in the local neighborhood of our own galaxy.
In 2174, with Earth's human overpopulation crisis causing resources to be very limited, humanity builds an sleeper ship/interstellar ark named Elysium. The mission is to send 60,000 people on a 123-year trip to an Earth-like planet named Tanis to establish civilization there.
In 2089, archaeologists Elizabeth Shaw and Charlie Holloway discover a star map in Scotland that matches others from several unconnected ancient cultures. They interpret this as an invitation from humanity's forerunners, the "Engineers". Peter Weyland, the elderly CEO of Weyland Corporation, funds an expedition to follow the map to the distant moon LV-223 aboard the scientific vessel Prometheus. The ship's crew-members travel in stasis while the android David monitors their voyage. Arriving in 2093, they are informed of their mission to find the Engineers. Mission director Meredith Vickers orders the crew not to make contact without her permission.
NewAgeMan
reply to post by BigfootNZ
You're assuming, maybe you didn't catch my edit, nor appreciate the nature of the earth-moon-system by which an Earth-like planet is made possible.
Your argument, based in randomness alone with a possibility matrix, doesn't increase the probability of another Earth, but actually diminishes it.
Edit to add: If "God" (intelligent design with intent and by anticipation) was/is involved, then it's a whole new ballgame, increasing by many many orders of magnitude the possibility that Earth is a cookie-cutter model for a self-replicating process.
It's not the belief itself, that alters the possibility, but the fundamental difference between two opposing and mutually exclusive hypothesis, one, intelligent design, and two, random fluke, which would have a rather hard time explaining THIS (MUST SEE)
Therefore, in conclusion, based on the hypothesis of intelligent design, but NOT fluke/coincidence, my hopes for the discovery of other Earth-like worlds, is bolstered.
DARREN1976
I would say "HAH!" "Told you so!"
BigfootNZ
Heck we have many planets in our own system with Moons, im sure somewhere at some point their moons eclipse the sun in some manner. Until we can reside on these neighboring planets we wont really know, although im sure someones done the maths already to make a simulation of such things.
Astronomers Detect First 'Clear Signs of Civilization' Beyond Earth - How will you react?
page: 1
Wolfenz
Fiction To inspire Great Minds !
Blue Shift
DARREN1976
I would say "HAH!" "Told you so!"
And then what?
In a way, it would be kind of sad. Rather than being a quirky, independent-thinking visionary, you'd just become one more of the billions of ordinary people who would just know something. I guess you could spend the rest of your life proclaiming, "Yeah, I knew about it before everybody else did!" But nobody would care.
NewAgeMan
No our moon is the only one that perfectly eclipses the sun from the POV of the host planet. There are also numerous other very curious whole round number integers which apply to the geometrical configuration of the earth-moon-sun system which do not apply to any other moon-planet in our solar system.
BigfootNZ
NewAgeMan
No our moon is the only one that perfectly eclipses the sun from the POV of the host planet. There are also numerous other very curious whole round number integers which apply to the geometrical configuration of the earth-moon-sun system which do not apply to any other moon-planet in our solar system.
But the thing is... what does any of that have to do with the moon being special for life? We got lucky being born on a planet with a moon that fits nicely over the sun during a solar eclipse, if it didn't we wouldn't have people attaching significance to it.
NewAgeMan
reply to post by JadeStar
hi JadeStar,
When you wake up and return to this thread tomorrow or when next you do, i have a question.
What do the planetary formation models show with respect to lunar obits, in terms of all the different ways that such a relationship might fall into a permanent, long term equilibrium and what does that looks like for the moon from it's perspective, in terms of daylight, and the various cyclical motions producing it's "seasons" and basic annual calendar year, coupled with it's host planet. It would be interesting to know what those configurations might look like from the moon's POV.
Sentient life-based planets like Earth otoh, may be much more rare, requiring something not entirely dissimilar from the moon-earth-sun configuration.
If so then there could also be many planets where BOTH the host planet AND the moon have life (of some kind), even with more than one moon harboring different forms of life.
What about moon-life, to what degree has that been considered and when can we look for it, that's probably not 'til the SKA, in like 2022 or thereabouts.
Our solar system is full of moons. Of the 8 major planets, 6 of them have at least one natural satellite in tow, and several of those moons are very interesting places. Icy moons in the outer solar system may even be secretly harboring life. But what about moons elsewhere in the galaxy?
The Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler (HEK) is an astronomy project intended to try and find exomoons. And not just any exomoons; the kind of moons that could be a haven for life. While the Kepler telescope has, sadly, been forced into retirement, the data it collected lives on. And there’s a lot of data still to sift though.
The idea of habitable moons is already well known to fans of science fiction. From Star Wars to Prometheus, the idea of a habitable world orbiting a gas giant is quite well ingrained on our collective subconscious. Perhaps this is what inspired the idea back in 2009 that we could look for exomoons with Kepler.
Next ten years. Should know. It's coming, the announcement of extraterrestrial life, but not necessarily and not likely an advanced ET civilization, as exciting as that would be, but if it's out there (life) somewhere, we'll find it eventually, even if we have to build a telescope the size of our entire solar system to see it. Then again as you've pointed out in the OP and throughout this thread, the instruments are all coming on line now, and for the next 10-20 years.
It's out there, but there aren't likely to be a whole lot of ten fingered typists in our shoes, like on Star Trek where every planet's life is humanoid.
BigfootNZ
NewAgeMan
No our moon is the only one that perfectly eclipses the sun from the POV of the host planet. There are also numerous other very curious whole round number integers which apply to the geometrical configuration of the earth-moon-sun system which do not apply to any other moon-planet in our solar system.
But the thing is... what does any of that have to do with the moon being special for life? We got lucky being born on a planet with a moon that fits nicely over the sun during a solar eclipse, if it didn't we wouldn't have people attaching significance to it,
someone found something interesting and attempts to say this is more than coincidence with out having any actual evidence it isnt simply that. Ascribing some special reason for that when we haven't got the ability to find out if there aren't other examples of it in the universes is pretty premature.
JadeStar
What is most exciting about moons is that we know of several gas giants bigger than Jupiter in habitable zones. Presumably they have moons (though we have not detected exomoons yet searches are ongoing). Anyway, large moons, perhaps as large or larger than the Earth in around these planets could be habitable, leading to a very real possibility of having multiple habitable moons around one giant planet.