It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Americans Are Finally Learning About False Flag Terror.

page: 1
<<   2 >>

log in


posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 03:15 AM
Is it a tactic used by Governments to control and herd any given population into the direction they wish?

The answer to that is "Hell yeah", and according to this article it happens far more than the general public is aware of.

This idea is not a conspiracy theory , its a conspiracy fact.

Governments from around the world admit they carry out false flag terror: :

•A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson

•Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939, and declared that the fire originated from Finland as a basis launching the Winter War four days later

•Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this)

•The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister

•The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security”(and see this)(Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special

Cont. here :-

So ATS what do you believe have been "False Flag" events?
edit on 25-11-2013 by Pinkorchid because: (no reason given)

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 03:24 AM
9/11 for sure. Look where the war on terror has got us to date. Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, potentially Syria, maybe Iran eventually.

7/7 in the U.K, people were changing their minds about the U.K's involvement in the war on terror, then 'Boom' we were attacked.

Who has benefitted the most from the war on terror? Who has the U.S an the U.K got us hating the most? Umm, Israel's enemies.

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 03:33 AM
reply to post by Cobaltic1978

And, as always, follow the money - who makes money on ammunitions when the PTB go to war?

The gov't contracts. And who is financing them? The World Bank, the IMF, the UN.

What? The UN?

Follow the money.

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 03:43 AM
reply to post by Happy1

Yes of course, money makes the world go bang!

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 06:08 AM
reply to post by Pinkorchid

9/11 was definitely a false flag event in my eyes! Bush Jr. wanted so badly to be a war hero just like his daddy that he would stop at nothing to accomplish his goal. When he asked the American people to support his plan to invade Iraq, we said hell no. All of a sudden the twin towers came tumbling down and we didn't even care that those accused didn't even have anything to do with Iraq, we just wanted revenge!

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 06:31 AM
not that I'm shocked...but it's always nice to have an "official" confirmation. Some people don't believe it until the criminal in a nice suit comes forward and confirms it. Than it becomes the truth. Up until that's a "crazy" conspiracy theory...which all the criminals are denying...naturally.

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 06:43 AM
False Fag events are more than just the event. The Industrial Propaganda Complex quickly follows…

WMD, Evil Dictators, and cries of "They're killing their people, they're killing their people!" soon follow.

Aww the Humanity!

Rally around the (false) flag boys.

The good thing is that people are waking up to this, the not so good thing is the next one will have to kill a lot of people for us to become blind with patriotism again.

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 11:56 AM
Don't forget the marathon bombing, with the the craft (blackwater) guys and backpacks. I think all of us have committed our own false flags. I remember in school i'd eat sunflower seeds and throw
the shells behind me on the floor and the kid sitting near there was suspected.
edit on 25-11-2013 by FirePiston because: (no reason given)

edit on 25-11-2013 by FirePiston because: (no reason given)

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 12:05 PM
Perhaps we as a people ARE opening our eyes, if just a bit. The false-flag potential of the Syrian Chemical Attacks resulted in the "war drums" in the current administration....but....the people of this United States would NOT be fooled again. WE as a people informed our representatives, en-masse, that they would be voted OUT if they went along with invading Syria with our son's, daughters, husbands, and fathers lives.

That, my friends, sent a clear message IMO. As the old song from the Who states,
",...we don't get fooled again! No..No.."

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 12:19 PM

Perhaps we as a people ARE opening our eyes, if just a bit. The false-flag potential of the Syrian Chemical Attacks resulted in the "war drums" in the current administration....but....the people of this United States would NOT be fooled again. WE as a people informed our representatives, en-masse, that they would be voted OUT if they went along with invading Syria with our son's, daughters, husbands, and fathers lives.

That, my friends, sent a clear message IMO. As the old song from the Who states,
",...we don't get fooled again! No..No.."

I am afraid we would be fooled again. Just because some people are waking up doesn't mean it is enough. I still only think less than 25% know what we do here. And I am sure tptb know that people are starting to wake up so their next event I think will be epic. Maybe the last and final grand finale.

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 12:26 PM
How about Department of State, Department of Justice, Whitehouse and BATFE conspiring to formulate a mission solely designed to denigrate a Constitutional Amendment and provide a vehicle for legislation that wouldn't even make it out of committee otherwise.

And so far get away with an act that should result in Impeachment and removal from office for all involved.

Not the first false flag on this issue but one of many since then regarding this Constitutional right.

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 12:50 PM
I think electronic components are the Rosetta Stone for world conflicts and the ultimate proof of a false flag.

Countries knowingly use outsourced electronic components that can have hidden back doors within their military weapons.

If we go to war with China, will our electronic components work when we press the button?

We have admission of NSA planting hardware back doors so why wouldn't China or other chip manufactures? In addition it would be extremely difficult to detect these back doors that would stay dormant until required.

"Compromised chips are the most covert of backdoors, says Columbia’s Sethumadhavan. There is essentially no way for the buyer of a completed chip to check that it doesn’t have a backdoor, he says, and there are a multitude of ways that a design can be compromised. "

If the world gov'ts are knowingly using parts manufactured by potential enemies to build their weapons, how likely are they really enemies?

I'm not saying there is a valid connection, but I do think its worth looking into how world gov't are interchanging electronic parts with one another in order to connect the dots.
edit on 25-11-2013 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 02:41 PM
reply to post by Pinkorchid

This is the Story of Martin Bryant

On the morning of Sunday 28 April 1996, a young Hobart man armed himself with three high-powered automatic firearms and a large quantity of ammunition, then drove to Port Arthur.

Just north of the township he entered the home of a local couple he knew. Inside, he shot and killed them both. He drove to the Historic Site and ate a meal on the deck of the Broad Arrow Café. He re-entered the café, which was crowded with lunchtime customers, took a rifle from his bag and began shooting. In the first 90 seconds, 20 people died and 12 were injured.

The devastating events of that day at Port Arthur encouraged Australians to question our laws on the private ownership of automatic and semi-automatic firearms. A vigorous national debate was marked by strongly-held views on both sides.

Eventually, State and Federal Governments passed new gun control laws that are among the strictest in the world.

Australia's Port Arthur Massacre ,Government and Media Lies Exposed

Was the massacre in Port Arthur a completely spontaneous act carried out by a single nutcase with unbelievable efficiency?

Or was it deliberately designed to distort public perception and direct maximum hatred against a particular group of people?

Martin Bryant, an intellectually impaired registered invalid with no training in the use of high powered assault weapons, could not under any circumstances have achieved or maintained the incredibly high and consistent killed-to-injured ratio and kill-rate which were bench marks of the Port Arthur massacre. Whoever was on the trigger that fateful day demonstrated professional skills equal to some of the best special forces shooters in the world. His critical error lay in killing too many people too quickly while injuring far too few, thereby exposing himself for what he was: a highly trained combat shooter probably ranked among the top twenty such specialists in the western world.

In the aftermath of the Port Arthur massacre, government went to great lengths to ignore or suppress all evidence suggesting that the official story of the day was unsubstantiated rubbish.

Are we to believe that a bunch of planners sat round a table and arranged the premeditated murders of 35 Australians?

Unfortunately the answer is yes.

One of the most damning sequences shows what appears to be Martin Bryant (well, a tall man with long blonde hair anyway) running down the road away from the Broad Arrow Cafe towards a coach park by the waterside. Because he is running directly away from the Broad Arrow Cafe with a bulky package under his arm the assumption is that the package contains a Colt AR15, the weapon known to have killed 20 victims in the cafe at a rate of one every five seconds. Problem! Scaled against the man’s height and surrounding objects the package he is carrying is a maximum of 22 inches long, a full ten inches too short for the Colt AR15 which measures 32 inches with its butt fully retracted, and more than ten inches too short for either of the other two weapons he is alleged to have owned: a Belgian FN FAL 7.62-mm and a 12 gauge combat shotgun. So who is this man running down the road, and why is he not carrying any of the weapons allegedly used in the massacre?

It is hard to kill quickly under such circumstances for a number of unpleasant practical reasons, including the fact that shot people tend to fall against other people, shielding the latter from subsequent bullets. Targets therefore have to be shot in a careful sequence with split-second timing to maximize kill rates. Whoever was on the trigger in Tasmania managed a kill rate well above that required of a fully trained soldier, an impossible task for a man with Martin Bryant’s mid-sixties IQ and his total lack of military training, which is an interesting but largely unimportant observation because we have already proved in absolute scientific terms that Bryant could not have acted alone.

Because of their illegal nature psyops are never formally ordered by governments, but are discreetly arranged through multinational corporations and others. Some psyops ordered during the last forty years are known to have been carried out by independent contractors hired from a small specialist group, staffed mostly by retired members of American and Israeli special forces.

Patsies are normally used as decoys, deliberately inserted into the psyop to deflect attention away from the specialist group, allowing the latter time to extract safely from the operational area while the patsy takes the blame. But the planners leave telltale signs and occasionally make critical mistakes. It is a little-known fact that Lee Harvey Oswald was proved a patsy when a New Zealand newspaper printed a story about his guilt several hours before he was accused of the crime in Dallas. The planners put the decoy story on the news wires too early, forgetting the crucial time difference would allow the New Zealand paper to print the story long before Oswald was even accused. It was a single planning error, but one that proved in absolute scientific terms that Lee Harvey Oswald was deliberately used as a patsy.

The records show that a total of 32 people were shot in the Broad Arrow Cafe, so at best we would expect 4 dead and 28 injured, or at worst 6 dead and 26 injured. These are very reliable military figures based on hard science, but the actual figures in the Broad Arrow Cafe were 20 dead and 12 injured - an incredible inverted ratio of 1.66 to 1, or nearly two dead for every one injured. Special forces train continuously for months on end to achieve a ratio as high as this, which lies far beyond the abilities of regular soldiers, and is an absolute scientific impossibility for an intellectually impaired registered invalid.

The professional shooter in Tasmania presented us with a final display of his unquestioned prowess when tourist Linda White and her boyfriend Mick approached Seascape Cottage on the Port Arthur road in a small four-wheel drive vehicle, shortly after the massacre in the Broad Arrow Cafe. Both saw the shooter aim and Linda White felt the wind of the first round as it passed her cheek and shattered the driver’s window next to her head. The shooter corrected his aim and the second round hit Linda White in the arm, just to the right of the heart target area. The third round killed the engine and stopped the vehicle.

In this his ultimate demonstration of combat shooting skill the shooter fired one sighting shot at a fast-moving target of unknown speed from an unsupported freestanding firing position, the most difficult of all; instantly and accurately compensated for vehicle speed and weapon recoil with the same blinding speed as the computer gun sight on an F14 Tomcat, then disabled both driver and vehicle with shots two and three. This man might have been an indispensable asset stopping speeding car-bombers in Beirut, but his professional skills were far too conspicuous for Port Arthur.t's Port Arthur Massacre Government and Media Lies Exposed

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 02:50 PM
reply to post by Pinkorchid

The above Story is the Problem/Reaction/Solution False Flag that was staged to bring the legally gun owning Australians , through political and media pressure to give up their gun rights.

As you may well know most of these "Lone shooter" massacres are carried out by either intellectually or psychologically impaired persons.

This type of individual makes for the designers of the "False Flag" the ideal patsy , because of not only the public perception of these individuals but their own inability to fully defend themselves against these accusations.

This in my mind this is the lowest possible deviancy that any Government can commit against both these individuals and the general public.

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 03:44 PM
The chemical weapons attack that nearly dragged us into war with Syria was a false flag.

One day it was the biggest threat in the world, something had to be done.
Now a few months later its practically forgotten.
edit on 201311America/Chicago11pm11pmMon, 25 Nov 2013 15:45:16 -06001113 by OneManArmy because: (no reason given)

(post by dlbott removed for a manners violation)

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 04:30 PM
reply to post by dlbott

I consider ridicule and insult to be traits of anyone who hasn't a solid point to make.

Your reply is useless it does not address what the posted stated and it presumes rather a slanderous overtone.

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 04:40 PM
I happen to disagree. Most Americans do not know what a true false flag is. Hell, many on ATS still do not have a firm grasp on the concept.

If Obama farts and it doesn't smell right.......we have people on here that claim is was a false flag, for whatever purpose they so choose.

We need to be very careful how we apply the term and realize that it does not always fit.


posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 04:41 PM
reply to post by Pinkorchid

Here's another thread running on Government false flag operations ;

posted on Nov, 25 2013 @ 04:52 PM
The problem I have with the concept of false flags is that it removes the possibility of bad people doing bad things vs the govt does everything. It becomes the default explanation of various scenarios for some folks here.

1. A man goes crazy, shoots 2 cops and kills an innocent victim. It's a false flag for gun control.
2. A complex network or web site breaks. False flag for something else.
3. Their is an explosion at an oil refinery. False flag.

Don't get me wrong, I 100% believe the various world Govts have had knowledge of specific events or caused or willfully allowed a small number of specific events in history to happen but their is a tendency by some here on ATS to automatically go to false flag on every event that is reported. That to me is just as alarming as those that think only "terrorists" do bad things.

new topics

<<   2 >>

log in