It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
InTheFlesh1980
reply to post by Kashai
I am pretty sure this experiment would result in a warm bowl of Relativistic Red Soup.
If the body were to somehow remain intact, which is impossible, then time would be flowing at significantly different rates within portions of the same body... which, I guess, would yield the same ultimate result as above. Certain death.
ChefSlug
reply to post by ChuckNasty
I feel Higg's Field's are time dialating based on the theory of inertial mass increase with velocity. Catching up?
Kashai
reply to post by ChuckNasty
I am not addressing the issue of effectively making an object massless with a warp bubble. But for the sake of argument what would happen if acceleration exceeded that of light, in relation to a spin, is an interesting question?
Any thoughts?edit on 15-11-2013 by Kashai because: Added content
ChuckNasty
reply to post by Kashai
Minus the inertia thing, you do have a ghetto time device.
Using current theory, the human would be able to move forward in time.
No different than traveling a distance at the same speed..
Since current theory also includes mass increasing when at that speed - inertia must be a factor.
Human soup will be the likely result.
But if you can do this without speed, just an edit in gravity, you should be able to do the same thing - minus the human soup. A time 'bubble' due to the gravity field should work.
Kashai
reply to post by ChuckNasty
I am not addressing the issue of effectively making an object massless with a warp bubble. But for the sake of argument what would happen if acceleration exceeded that of light, in relation to a spin, is an interesting question?
Any thoughts?
Kashai
reply to post by Bedlam
"Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity, not velocity."
Can you elaborate on that point and explain how it is relevant?
Sorry to be so pickyedit on 15-11-2013 by Kashai because: Added content
Kashai
reply to post by Bedlam
"Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity, not velocity."
Can you elaborate on that point and explain how it is relevant?
ChefSlug
...therefore, the speed of light is not a definitive constant, but an accepted range considered one value.