Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

How to Tap the Zero-Point Energy?

page: 1
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 06:22 AM
link   
There are a series of videos on the YouTube channel of open-source researcher Russ Gries which were recorded at the recent Global Breakthrough Energy Movement conference.

Listening to the presentations provides some terminology that is helpful. One such term is "inertial chemistry" by the presenter Mike Waters.



He said he uses the term to refer to such things as cavitation or high frequency oscillations - anyway you can to shake a molecule apart without using chemical reaction.

We need a whole glossary of this terminology.




posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 06:27 AM
link   

Mary Rose
We need a whole glossary of this terminology.


Not really, the snake oil salesmen just make crap up or misuse existing terms.

Unless you mean to put it all under "Crap"!



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 06:29 AM
link   
reply to post by hellobruce
 


Intelligent people know how to sift through crap.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 06:32 AM
link   

Mary Rose
Intelligent people know how to sift through crap.


Very true, that is how we know this is all crap.

Unless......



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 06:39 AM
link   
Really? No one bought into your "plasmodis" thread on zero point energy so we get this one instead? Copy pasta doesn't get more scientific the more you do it, or the more gobbledygook you add to it.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 06:41 AM
link   
reply to post by Mary Rose

He said he uses the term to refer to such things as cavitation or high frequency oscillations - anyway you can to shake a molecule apart without using chemical reaction.

 


So why does it say: "Sodium cvcle" on that slide. Is cvcle intended to be cycle? Hmm… odd. Sodium implies a chemical reaction does it not?



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 06:42 AM
link   

Mary Rose
reply to post by hellobruce
 


Intelligent people know how to sift through crap.



What have you sifted through lately?




posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 06:54 AM
link   

hellobruce

Mary Rose
We need a whole glossary of this terminology.


Not really, the snake oil salesmen just make crap up or misuse existing terms.

Unless you mean to put it all under "Crap"!
Exactly. I call it "dictionary abuse".

We need less of that, not more. But some of it can be entertaining. Some guy wound the wires a little differently around an ordinary electrical coil, and then it was called:

"Flux Thruster Atom Pulsar Electrical venturi space-time implosion field generator coil." One of Mary's heroes, I surmise.

It has the amazing property of being less efficient than an ordinary coil.

Plus the inventor claims it can cure all disease and provide unlimited free energy, and transport you to any galaxy in the universe, though he can't explain how.

Enough with these nonsense terms and claims already. But if you really need more this Rockwell Retro Encabulator video contains some you can add to your glossary:



Most of it is nonsense, but it sounds good, just like the nonsense in the OP.

It's unfortunate some people can't tell the difference, but some people really can't.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 06:54 AM
link   
reply to post by hellobruce
 


I have a friend that absolutely believes that Free Energy is impossible. He, along with you are still waiting for Columbus to sail off the edge of the earth. Try educating yourself with the science series "Energy From the Vaccuum". In one vid, John Bedini talks about and shows a machine called the Kromrey converter, which he started to make many of. But TPTB got in there and shut down the manufacturing. Then, when there were only ten left, MIT bought all ten and put them on a shelf never to be seen by the world again. That's progress for ya.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 06:59 AM
link   

w8tn4it
reply to post by hellobruce
 


I have a friend that absolutely believes that Free Energy is impossible. He, along with you are still waiting for Columbus to sail off the edge of the earth. Try educating yourself with the science series "Energy From the Vaccuum". In one vid, John Bedini talks about and shows a machine called the Kromrey converter, which he started to make many of. But TPTB got in there and shut down the manufacturing. Then, when there were only ten left, MIT bought all ten and put them on a shelf never to be seen by the world again. That's progress for ya.


Don't worry, you can buy the secrets to the Kromrey Convertor here.

It's only 29.00, then you will have all the "energy from the vacuum" you want.

Shh though, it's a secret.
edit on 7-11-2013 by boncho because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 07:00 AM
link   

w8tn4it
But TPTB got in there and shut down the manufacturing.


How did they do that?


Then, when there were only ten left, MIT bought all ten and put them on a shelf never to be seen by the world again.


And your source for that silly claim is....?



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 07:07 AM
link   
reply to post by w8tn4it
 


Naysayers seem to love to ridicule inventors and to deny suppression has existed and people who have been killed under suspicious circumstances just died a natural or accidental death. They really seem to take pleasure in it.




posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 07:13 AM
link   
reply to post by Arbitrageur
 


Such a knockoff of the Turbo Encabulator:



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 07:24 AM
link   
reply to post by ChuckNasty
 

Yeah that was the original.

By the way a real scientist has a patent on a device to extract energy from the vacuum:

Quantum vacuum energy extraction


A system is disclosed for converting energy from the electromagnetic quantum vacuum available at any point in the universe to usable energy in the form of heat, electricity, mechanical energy or other forms of power. By suppressing electromagnetic quantum vacuum energy at appropriate frequencies a change may be effected in the electron energy levels which will result in the emission or release of energy.


How come the OP wants to discuss nonsense terminology instead of a real patent by a real scientist?

I think I know why it won't work, but I wish the inventor all the best of luck in trying to make it work.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 07:29 AM
link   

Mary Rose
reply to post by w8tn4it
 


Naysayers seem to love to ridicule inventors and to deny suppression has existed and people who have been killed under suspicious circumstances just died a natural or accidental death. They really seem to take pleasure in it.


Wrong. It's about credibility. These inventors have made all these inventions which really do work but EVERY single one has been suppressed by the government, men in black, oil companies etc etc. If that excuse cannot be used then their families have been threatened with death.

Edward Snowden is sitting in Russia right now releasing secrets about how the NSA works. I find it absolutely incredible that he is still alive and releasing documents when all these free energy inventors have been totally shut down or killed.........erm sorry but that comparison shows how ludicrous the free energy claims are.

Why is it that all these free energy inventors "invent" in countries that are suppressing their inventions and yet allow them to make a fortune from gullible people who buy their book? Why is that these very clever people are sooooooo stupid that they cannot work out that it would be better to bugger off to a neutral country and invent there. Once the secret is out on the internet then the proverbial genie is out of the bottle and no government will be able to stop it. Why haven't countries who are anti US and have no oil resources developing these free energy devices? Please don't give the excuse that the inventor would like to make some money from his invention which is why they don't put the full details on the internet (after having fought of the MIB threats via their ISP !!). The first working device, even if in the public domain, would make them a fortune from the books, movies and interviews about "How I invented the first free energy device". Just think they could add all the death threats to spice the story up a bit !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The only people who never have to pay for their energy are the free energy inventors...........because they use book royalties from the failed device descriptions to pay the bills DUH!

FYI, I would love to be wrong but I have spent the last 30 years looking at these things and NOT ONE working device has emerged just a myriad excuses and promises.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 07:30 AM
link   

Arbitrageur
How come the OP wants to discuss nonsense terminology instead of a real patent by a real scientist?


Thanks for illustrating my point about loving to ridicule.

When innovators discover principles, new terminology emerges. "Nonsense" to you is understanding by others who see things you don't.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 07:39 AM
link   

Mary Rose
When innovators discover principles, new terminology emerges. "Nonsense" to you is understanding by others who see things you don't.
You mean like the hollow tubes used in demonstrations of the Keely motor technology? You are the one lacking in understanding, that all his fancy terminology was a ruse just like more nonsense terminology you found more recent examples of.

Yes, others see things that you don't, like the hollow tubes which you choose to ignore or disregard because you "want to believe" in nonsense claims that never have any credible evidence.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 07:40 AM
link   
reply to post by hellobruce
 

It's in the video, quoted by John Bedini himself.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 07:59 AM
link   

w8tn4it
reply to post by hellobruce
 

It's in the video, quoted by John Bedini himself.
Bedini is a known fraud, so his claims have no credibility. He has marketed a fraudulent product that technologically can't possibly do what he claims, which anybody who understand the technology knows, as discussed here.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Unfortunately, only really gullible people believe him and buy his fraudulent products.



posted on Nov, 7 2013 @ 08:36 AM
link   
reply to post by Mary Rose
 





and to deny suppression has existed


Now you are making up tales,


Where has there been any denial that suppression has existed?





new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join