It is known now that humands did not descend from monkeys million years ago, and that all 7 billion humans living on earth now are all from one man
and one woman who definitly lived in Africa.
It's always been known and well established that humans did not descend from monkeys. we share a common ancestor with the other apes(chimpanzee,
bonobo, orangutan, gorilla and gibbon) as for all current humans being direct descendants of 2 people living 25,000 years ago... absolutely not. care
to provide a citation for your postulations?
the fact that 10% of our DNA is Junk DNA that came only from the Tsetse fly (this tsetse dna found in Eskimo too )
this 10% across all humans chinese eskimo, etc is inherited from common ancestor/ancestors who definitly lived in the area of land where the Tsetse
It is known that all flies and mosketoes don't immigrate. a fly can only wander randomely around its birth place untill it dies.
the finding of mosquetoes every where is caused by human migration. who transported flies and mosquitoes in ships or planes of recent times.
Junk DNA? did i time travel to 1989 or something? we now know that most of what used to be called junk DNA actually has a purpose. Just because it's
not coding doesn't mean it doesn't have another purpose like regulation. As for your hypothesis on how mosquitos and flies get around, do you really
believe that they were geographically isolated until the advent of modern transportation?
The mutation rate in DNA transcribing is found to be the same in all DNA human and not human and it is around 0.004. it used to be thought of
as 0.002 when they decided that Y chromosome Adam lived 50 000 years ago. Now with Mutation rate of 0.004 is half that time ie 25 000 years ago.
so many errors I don't even know where to begin...
all the anthropologists and paleontologists discoveries about million years old humans are lies based on junk science. There was never
evolution. all species (foxes , bears) are replicas of original first fox/bear etc.
all the mutations observed in nature so far can only cause nothing or cause a disease. never a mutation caused so called evolution. Time can only
accumulate disease and degradation in a species., never time cause enhancement (evolution).
Couldn't you have just started off with the premise that you don't understand how evolution works on the most basic level? Why save that for the
end? Evolution is NOT about enhancement. It's about surviving and thriving. Just because something is alive today does not mean it is a better
version of something from our past nor has that ever been uttered by an Anthropologist. Mutations do NOT only cause disease. Tell me, which million
year old humans are you referring to? AMH have only been around approx 200,000 years.
A mechanism that is likely to be particularly common for adding information is gene duplication, in which a long stretch of DNA is copied, followed
by point mutations that change one or both of the copies. Genetic sequencing has revealed several instances in which this is likely the origin of some
proteins. For example:
Two enzymes in the histidine biosynthesis pathway that are barrel-shaped, structural and sequence evidence suggests, were formed via gene duplication
and fusion of two half-barrel ancestors (Lang et al. 2000).
RNASE1, a gene for a pancreatic enzyme, was duplicated, and in langur monkeys one of the copies mutated into RNASE1B, which works better in the more
acidic small intestine of the langur. (Zhang et al. 2002)
Yeast was put in a medium with very little sugar. After 450 generations, hexose transport genes had duplicated several times, and some of the
duplicated versions had mutated further. (Brown et al. 1998)
The biological literature is full of additional examples. A PubMed search (at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
) on "gene duplication"
gives more than 3000 references.