Sucks for the kids, this is the second time the government shunned the children. First with WIC, now with this.
Well they can't stop social security because there actually would be riots. If you shutdown welfare contrary to popular belief there would be no
riots. Welfare consists of WIC and TANF. Both go to mothers with children. Mothers with babies at home usually don't own a firearm. They also almost
never do anything about anything. No offense but the essence of being female is submission. That's what it means. Men are stronger physically for a
reason its always been our job to take care of things like this.
As far as SNAP, the only rioting would be localized to California, Louisiana, etc... Would not affect most people.
Now you stop disability and old peoples social security checks omg that's a whole other story. I posted this all last night about midnight with news
articles. Its not new people signing up that are being left out in the cold. These are not forward funded programs (FFIS) ANYONE on them will stop
receiving the benefits. Period. They have sent out notices to all offices to not send out checks in November for WIC and SNAP already.
Medicaid is funded through Jan of next year again forward funded (FFIS). People don't understand how these things work thus the confusion. There is
not already money in the system to pay the benefits to people already on the program unless its FORWARD FUNDED FFIS.
So November. Goodbye WIC, goodbye SNAP, TANF should have gone already. I wish more people would get involved and study this so they would know just
how screwed up this country is. We pay half off so the other half can't do anything about the tyranny.
Anyhow hope that clears it up.
edit on 16-10-2013 by Pimpintology because: (no reason given)
This is all sorts of wrong, lol. *ATS, why must you bring me the the cusp of ignorance?*
First I will say you're right, disability/social security/veterans being cut off would be the worst in numbers absolutely. They are strong in
numbers, and the majority of the age group falls into generations who actually know how to protest. But you are wrong about welfare recipients, mother
and children not having an effect of this.
First of all, while men may have more 'strength' than women, they derived if FROM women. In more than one way too. Like how about the fact that all
fetuses start female? Being male, scientifically speaking, is a post-creation genetic variation. Or how about the fact that without women you could
not 'breed' humans, unless it was in a lab in some distant future? (May I also add that female gun owners are only 8% less than males, 43% vs 35%
) ... And that submission thing? and the part about women never
doing anything? .. I'm not even going to go there, you obviously haven't heard of the women's rights movement, or countless others. They may be the
more 'docile' gender, but I assure you it just for CONTROL...
As for riots only happening in 2 states, hahahhahahhahhahahahahahaha. There are 'hoods' and low income areas with people who will likely fall into
the 'may be a problem' category in every county, in every state, in ALL of America. After all a riot always starts with just one
inciting a mob.
I agree that there will be a whollle lot of problems if social security, disability, and veteran benefits were cut off. No arguments there.
And people are *sadly* used to not having health insurance in America, so if they were receiving medicaid but it stopped abruptly they wouldn't
'riot' over it.. they'd just go to the hospital and never pay the medical bills like countless do
I agree these programs need to be changed. For one I really don't believe that non citizens should get the amount of benefits they do, but at the end
of the day we are an nation of immigrants and can't complain because someone who isn't 'legal' is getting the perks that actual citizens do. After
all we did steal this country, pillage, and kill countless people to get where we are- in the case of morality these are the 'right' ways to go, I