It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Of one thing we can be certain: had any of these articles presented the magic bullet that falsifies human-caused global warming, that article would be on its way to becoming one of the most-cited in the history of science.
Pretty undeniable which side of the fence this guy is coming from, and what he's trying to convey - successfully, imho - by his report/data.
Scientists do not disagree about human-caused global warming.
This work follows that of Oreskes (Science, 2005) who searched for articles published between 1993 and 2003 with the keyword phrase “global climate change.” She found 928, read the abstracts of each and classified them. None rejected human-caused global warming.
...and entire papers as necessary to judge whether a paper "rejects" human-caused global warming or professes to have a better explanation of observations.
Polls show that many members of the public believe that scientists substantially disagree about human-caused global warming. (and, asserts that this is wrong)