posted on Sep, 22 2013 @ 04:16 AM
I am currently involved in legal immigration. I can 100% guarantee you that illegal immigration does effect legal immigration.
Then I guess you can 100% back that up.
Well I am glad we both agree it's wrong no matter who is getting freebies in exchange for votes.
Sure, but that points out an error in the system and not the illegals themselves so, why harp on them?
Because they are taking advantage of it and there is no reason to reward them for doing so?
It would be like me illegally breaking into your house, getting you give me stuff for free via extortion using a legal loophole, and then demanding
you legally let me use one of your bedrooms. Then telling you to not harp on me because I used some legal loopholes to steal your stuff after I
illegally broke in and blame the person who made the loophole. Why should amnesty be given? The default position should always be enforcing the law
unless there is a reason not to.
As I said, I am dealing with legal immigration at the moment, and the illegal immigration problem is causing problems. If you wish to think otherwise
you are welcome to do so. There is zero reason to offer amnesty other than to buy votes.