It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
sk0rpi0n
reply to post by Akragon
read the entire chapter of Hebrews 9... it has nothing to do with how many times a person dies...
The chapter is about whether or not Jesus had to die more then once to accomplish his task...
It has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not a person can be returned to the physical or not
It doesn't... but the Biblical idea that it is appointed for every man to die once... matters a great deal when it comes to Jesus. That is, if at all Christians believe that Jesus was a man.
If someone believes he was "fully man and fully God" or "God himself", then they would have to present Biblical proof, from Jesus to prove so.
edit on 10-9-2013 by sk0rpi0n because: (no reason given)
sk0rpi0n
reply to post by FlyersFan
Personal opinion.
Well ... considering that the Qu'ran was obviously NOT divinely inspired ...
If you want "first hand", lets go by the Israelites "first hand" definition of the Messiah as being a man...
How would you explain to an atheist - who denies one religion more than you - that any of what Christians believe is true?
Akragon
Jesus actually made several references to man returning to this horrid place...
sk0rpi0n
That is, if at all Christians believe that Jesus was a man.
If someone believes he was "fully man and fully God" or "God himself", then they would have to present Biblical proof, from Jesus to prove so.
You mean "common sense" and "facts" as defined by someone who follows some bizarre customized version of Christianity, minus Moses and Abraham? No thanks.
No. Common sense based on the facts surrounding the writing of the Qu'ran and who wrote it.
I present the facts. It's up to them to believe it or not.
Also the Jews can present their facts that the New Testament came about several centuries after the Old Testament and using your own reasoning can dismiss the NT as an invention by "clueless people".
Like I present the fact that the gospels are first hand accounts, but the Qur'an was invented 600 years later by clueless people.
That was their anticipation ... and they got their anticipation wrong.
That's not 'first hand accounts' of the life of Christ. That's anticipation on their part.
Two different things.
Perhaps you could explain that a bit more considering Jesus didn't say "every man lives once"... that was Psudo-Paul... and barely that.
sk0rpi0n
reply to post by Akragon
Perhaps you could explain that a bit more considering Jesus didn't say "every man lives once"... that was Psudo-Paul... and barely that.
Its best if we could establish some sort of methodology regarding how we interpret the Bible.
Is it going to be Jesus' words only? I'm fine with that... I can take back the verse in Hebrews 9.
Is it going to be the Bible as a whole?
No problem again, but then do non-Jesus characters take precedence over Jesus words? Would Jesus' words take precedence over Gods words? On what basis?
You've been shown that here at ATS for years. But you continue to deny it.
I understand that if you accept the proof that scripture shows Jesus is God incarnate then your Muslim religion becomes irrelevant,
sk0rpi0n
You mean "common sense" and "facts" as defined by someone who follows some bizarre customized version of Christianity, minus Moses and Abraham? No thanks.
I present the facts. It's up to you to believe it or not.
Also the Jews can present their facts that the New Testament came about several centuries after the Old Testament and using your own reasoning can dismiss the NT as an invention by "clueless people".
Whats good for the goose, is good for the gander.
so Christianity - despite coming centuries after the Israelite religion - got it right, while the Israelites were wrong... for 2000 years.
So why then does Christianity depend on Israelite scriptures?
sk0rpi0n
In fact the very idea of "fully man fully God" is ALIEN to the Israelite religion
Find me ONE verse where Jesus says directly "I am God", and then we can talk about Islam becoming irrelevant.
The final proof of Jesus’ divinity we will consider can be found in the last two chapters of the book of Revelation. According to Revelation 21:6-7, Almighty God reveals himself to us in plain terms: "And he said to me, ‘It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. To the thirsty I will give from the fountain of the water of life without payment. He who conquers shall have this heritage, and I will be his God and he shall be my son.’"
And he said to me, "These words are trustworthy and true. And the Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, has sent his angel to show his servants what must soon take place . . . I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end . . . I Jesus have sent my angel to you with this testimony for the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, the bright morning star."
During Christ's trial, the chief priests asked Him point blank, "Tell us if you are the Christ, the Son of God." And He said,
• "I am." (Mark 14:60-62)
• "Yes, it is as you say." (Matt. 26: 63-65)
• "You are right in saying I am." (Luke 22:67-70)
These are all ways of saying the same thing, written by different authors.
Jesus says in John 10:11-18 that he is the Good Shepherd. When you read this passage along with Ezekiel 34:1-16, you can see that Jesus was identifying Himself with God, who pronounced Himself Shepherd over Israel . The Jewish people, being an agrarian and shepherding society, knew and dearly loved this section of the Old Testament because God was using a metaphor they lived every day. So when Jesus said, "I am the Good Shepherd," and that whole John passage so clearly parallels the Ezekiel passage, there was no doubt that He was claiming to be God.
John 16:28. "I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father." What Christ is saying here is that he existed along with the Father before being born. He "entered the world" by wrapping Himself in human flesh and being born as a baby. He grew up, fulfilled His mission/ministry, was crucified and raised from the dead (all part of the "mission") and then left the world to go back to the Father in heaven, where He is now seated at the right hand of God (the place of honor). He is the only person who ever existed before conception. That Christ was in a "pre-incarnate state" means that He is God.
Christianity is on par with Hinduism - a religion that seems to blur the lines between man and divinity.
Christianity says humans are not God and never become God.
sk0rpi0n
That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:-
Nay, Allah raised him up unto Himself; and Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise;-
—Qur'an 4:157-158
Yes. Common sense. Moses and Abraham ... no thanks. That's common sense.
If you presented 'facts' then you wouldn't be clinging to that Qur'an but instead would accept the FACT that the Qu'ran isn't from God
As far as im concerned Jesus knew "Gods word" directly from him...
sk0rpi0nIts a "fact" only according to someone who denies the prophethood of Abraham and Moses.
Your views are garbage in the sight of Jews, Christians and Muslims... who revere Moses and Abraham.