posted on Sep, 9 2013 @ 06:32 PM
reply to post by ExquisitExamplE
Let's break it down real fast:
The image phage used is the image from the original post. That image did not come from the Navy. Phage said it *MAY* have come from a previous version
of the clementine browser and screen capped, but we can't verify that. The image with the blur, as confirmed by the OP, came from a conspiracy
website. It did not come from the Navy as far as we can tell.
In Phages over/under image, the top image is the actual image from the OP and the lower image is from the Navy. It looks like phage used markers to
show the images were from the same location and to confirm that no structures were in the area.
The image from Skeptic overlord is not a "new image". It is the original image from the Navy. Your confusion is you are assuming the assumption that
the blurred image came from a previous version of clementine browser is accurate, when in reality we don't know exactly how that image was created, a
best guess was made.
The reason this was moved to the hoax bin is specifically that. The original image was sourced from a conspiracy site, and the blur can't be
replicated at this time. The original image as provided by the Navy does not have the blur. It could well be that someone perpetuated a hoax by
blurring the area of no data in order to make it seem the Navy was hiding something, or it could well be, as Phage said, that the image came from an
old version of the clementine browser which blurred areas that did not contain data.
And again, Funskters technique does not work on images as the actual light source of the image isn't changing. It only works if you have images taken
of an object and the light source around the object changed. You need multiple images for this to work, not a single image with a blur covering a
patch of no data.
edit on 9-9-2013 by raymundoko because: (no reason given)