It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ycon
Kerry should of won this election due to his blood being more royal then Bush's. Because he didn't win, I expect either Bush did do vote fraud or they wanted to leave Bush in power to lead us into WWIII. I believe the last 4 years we saw the good side of Bush, the next 4 he will be very bad. In 2008 Kerry may not choose Edwards for his vice, I believe we will see Hillary with him.
Originally posted by SkipShipman
Kerry did win the election, so the royal blood thing still holds. The fact that the upstart with less royal blood hoodwinked the election as the exit polls reflect is no exception to the rule. Hillary wants the prize and will probably get it, at least being a candidate. By then they may amend the Constitution, repealing the 22nd amendment, thus allowing Bush to continue as our dictator. So it is not over, until it is over, with regards to Yogi Berra or Yogi Bear, whatever you prefer.