It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Propulsion
reply to post by DZAG Wright
I think you get to win the “race baiter” of the day award here on ATS….
The difference (as if you're too mentally-short to have known this) is that when a black kills a black, the murderer isn't given a pat on the head, his gun back, and told to have a nice night. The reason given isn't that "he was college educated and clean cut so we believed his story".
I took it as meaning Bull Shi*
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by nancyliedersdeaddog
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Sharingan
The person is an utter moron.
But arresting him is as wrong as wrong can be.
Look how easy it was for us to identify him as a moron, too! People should be free to say what they feel. That way we know who the ashclowns of the world are.
So you would be cool with people talking like Patrick Bateman to your sister, grandmother, or wife on social media? People need to realize that you can't make death threats and say other horrible things on social media without punishment by either law enforcement or civilians. I usually would agree with not arresting for speech crimes but you can't talk about killing a whole race of people and cop's and expect not get in some kind of trouble. It's a sad world when you have 11-18 year old's making death threats to whole a race of people without a care in the world and hopefully some of those people will read the article and think twice next time.
I think humanity needs to get over itself.
People use hyperbole all the time. A single, off handed comment. By some schmuck with random, everyday people as friends.
This guy doesn't have any kind of audience, nor enough credibility with others, to have his words create any meaningful action.
My wife/grandmother/mom....I doubt they would be frequenting his FB page. So I am unsure how they would see it. But if they did go there, then they chose to see it.
Question: why did you focus on female family members in your example? Do you believe women to be in need of protection?
Originally posted by My_Reality
reply to post by Sharingan
I don't understand why he was arrested. I don't condone it or support it either. He was exercising his right to freedom of speech. He did not name anyone specific in his ramblings. He did not state how he was going to execute his threats in his ramblings. Not to mention the fact that literally thousands upon thousands of people have voiced similar diatribes in the recent past calling for violence on unnamed, unspecified targets.
This could set a dangerous precedent for the little people of any skin color if this grammatically challenged individual is successfully prosecuted. His right to freedom of speech should be respected. His rant should be viewed with that right in mind considering he did not threaten anyone directly. If anyone should be arrested, hauled to jail and prosecuted it should be the people that placed an open bounty on Zimmerman.
Now that my personal opinion is out of the way.....let us all dispel the illusions. He was arrested for one reason. He threatened "authorities". They have no sense of humor when their overvalued persons are trifled with. They jump to action immediately to quash any danger to themselves. This little fact is probably the one primary difference between the threat of the arrested man and the multitude of threats by others of similar thought and speech.
Gotta love how the "authorities" prioritize don't you think? Hundreds of thousands of random threats to random unnamed people. No reaction. One threat to random unnamed "authorities". Immediate reaction.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by ThreeBears
Porn is not hate speech. Porn is filmed sex.
How the "actors" are acquired may be debatable. But to call porn "violence".....should I be expecting to go to jail for domestic violence this evening when my wife and I meet after hours?
Originally posted by nancyliedersdeaddog
I agree a lot of times people take things way to seriously but you threatening to kill people is crossing the line and usually against the law. How do you know he wouldn't hurt someone when he's been convicted for felony assault in the past granted we don't know the facts of the case? How do you know he hasn't made multiple threats against white people and cops to his friends and family? Can you please tell me how many people followed his social media account, how he has no credibility, and how you found out about his mental state? How many people would have to be in his audience for him to be a threat and how would you determine if he would really hurt someone?
So you wouldn't be mad at the cops or his family and friends if the guy really did end up hurting someone and they had prior knowledge of his threat? I will say I agree a lot of people make empty threats but think about all the times in the past when people who have end up doing horrible things have been dismissed because people said they would never do such a horrible act or they had no creditably.
I didn't focus on female family members for any particular reason my question would also apply to male family members. If some random person on social media made a threat to any of your family members would you tell that family members it's not a big deal since they have no creditably and it's probably an empty threat?
Originally posted by Sharingan
There have always been laws on the books against inciting a riot and making threats, (terroristic threat) nothing "police state" about it.
Cops and DA's just pick and choose when to enforce it and if it comes from a minority group like the black panthers, they usually ignore it
He is writing in code if you didn't know
Originally posted by Evanzsayz
reply to post by mrno1
He is writing in code if you didn't know
Yeah we know, but doesn't change the fact that it makes him look like a complete moron.
Who said there was something "police state" about it anyway, Did you even read what I posted? How about we just use a little logic instead of fabricating arguments that I never even made.
You can't call for people to murder police. It's not okay since he said to murder many of them and not one specifically by name.
Originally posted by Sharingan
I think I was reading what the poster above you said, which was something about a police state but I replied to your post instead