It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HauntWok
I can see the ticket now, Sarah Palin/Herman Cain 2016
And the slogan will be "We just give up"
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by HauntWok
I can see the ticket now, Sarah Palin/Herman Cain 2016
And the slogan will be "We just give up"
I think it will be Ted Cruz and Rand Paul ticket.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Redden
Well, if it's left up to the party elites as you say then were doomed. They will nominate a statist, big-government Progressive GOP person and not a Conservative. They hate Conservatives.
Originally posted by darkbake
This is interesting, but I think the economy is a bigger issue than social policy at the moment. Who cares about foreign policy when we have so many people without solid jobs?
With the way people think, I'm not sure they would want 4-8 more years of Democrats in the Executive Branch -
I am solidly centrist. In fact, I think that either Democrats or Republicans are useful depending on the circumstances of the situation that needs attention.
I am still unsure about Obama Care. I hear reports of it being cheaper than expected when it is tested - but I also hear reports that it could be way too costly - if that is the case, it could potentially be the crippling blow to our economy.edit on 22-7-2013 by darkbake because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Redden
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Redden
Well, if it's left up to the party elites as you say then were doomed. They will nominate a statist, big-government Progressive GOP person and not a Conservative. They hate Conservatives.
Yea exactly, and I just thought of the person they would choose as their nominee....
Wait for it...
Wait for it...
Jeb Bush.
Cruz is folly at this point. He can't be prez due to his (documented) birthplace.
The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term "natural born" citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship "by birth" or "at birth", either by being born "in" the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship "at birth". Such term, however, would not include a person who was not a U.S. citizen by birth or at birth, and who was thus born an "alien" required to go through the legal process of "naturalization" to become a U.S. citizen.
Originally posted by jjkenobi
Democrats will continue to win elections by promising more handouts to the 47%. Republican candidates will lose because they try to be middle of the road and don't appeal to real conservatives.