It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Amni is River of life
Amnio is the bowl catching the blood of the lamb
Amnion is the sac covering the womb
Amniotic fluid is the water of the lamb
Amnesia is the fact we cannot remember our invariable symmetric creation we God created us first.
Amnesty is the release we get when the thief stealing from the future is forgiven.
Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Amni is River of life
Amnio is the bowl catching the blood of the lamb
Amnion is the sac covering the womb
Amniotic fluid is the water of the lamb
Amnesia is the fact we cannot remember our invariable symmetric creation we God created us first.
Amnesty is the release we get when the thief stealing from the future is forgiven.
I wasn't aware the bible was originally written in English.
Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Amni is River of life
Amnio is the bowl catching the blood of the lamb
Amnion is the sac covering the womb
Amniotic fluid is the water of the lamb
Amnesia is the fact we cannot remember our invariable symmetric creation we God created us first.
Amnesty is the release we get when the thief stealing from the future is forgiven.
I wasn't aware the bible was originally written in English.
Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Wow. Two different sets of numbers both equate to 46 when you add them together?
Mind blown.
Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Wow. Two different sets of numbers both equate to 46 when you add them together?
Mind blown.
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by EnochWasRight
In this moment of presence there is light appearing - the light of consciousness or Christ the son of God.
In this moment of presence there is God that is seeing and knowing the light.
The light that is appearing now, right now and always now is constantly moving and changing - look and listen (see and hear). The light is arising and no one is making it happen but it is just happening always presently. The constantly changing present.
The seer of the light will never be seen - it is the unseen, never changing presence.
It is one and there is absolutely nothing else.
English is a West Germanic language that originated from the Anglo-Frisian dialects brought to Britain by Germanic invaders and/or settlers from various parts of what is now northwest Germany and the Netherlands.
Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
No, not really.
English came from German and Northern European languages.. It has influences from many western languages, but the Greek/Latin influence did not begin until the 13th century.
English is a West Germanic language that originated from the Anglo-Frisian dialects brought to Britain by Germanic invaders and/or settlers from various parts of what is now northwest Germany and the Netherlands.
wiki
It's absolutely not founded on the Bible. Just like most things people claim are founded on or discussed in the Bible. Like DNA.edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by EnochWasRight
It is only the mind with it's words and symbols that can ever have more than one. It is the mind that measures and divides.
This moment is whole, it is one undivided thing and the mind says past and future and it has imagined that there is more than this moment. Past and future do not actually exist - only as a word, a thought, an idea - as a concept.
This moment of presence is all that ever exists in reality and the bible tries it's hardest to point to it. But man is living in time and in abstract symbols - in a dream of separation - trying to find his way home.
You can never be separated from presence - there is only presence. All else is imagined, in presence as presence.
All is appearing here and now always.
This is it and it will always be this but this will constantly appear different.
What is knowing this?edit on 18-7-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
No, not really.
English came from German and Northern European languages.. It has influences from many western languages, but the Greek/Latin influence did not begin until the 13th century.
English is a West Germanic language that originated from the Anglo-Frisian dialects brought to Britain by Germanic invaders and/or settlers from various parts of what is now northwest Germany and the Netherlands.
wiki
It's absolutely not founded on the Bible. Just like most things people claim are founded on or discussed in the Bible. Like DNA.edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)
Before the King James, if you traveled 10 miles in England, the early English was not unified enough to understand from one clan to the next. After the printing of the Bible, the Hebrew and Greek brought the final version together from the languages of the Bible. Our alphabet of letters can be charted next to the Greek and Hebrew, not only by meaning, but by shape.
German is written under the Latin alphabet of 26 letters. As I pointed out, Aleph Bet is the Father (Letters) of the alphabet. The origin is not in the unfolded languages, but from the enfolded letters. DNA is the original. When an acorn unfolds, it is the oak tree. When the oak tree enfolds, it is the acorn. What is the germ in the center expressing the information (Letters) from the housing? When the seed (House) breaks, the germ expresses. We can claim the shadow we produced from the germ, but the germ itself IS creation.
God is the Strength of the House.
edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)
Modern English, which includes the works of William Shakespeare[39] and the King James Bible, is generally dated from about 1550
In January 1604, King James I of England convened the Hampton Court Conference where a new English version was conceived in response to the perceived problems of the earlier translations as detected by the Puritans,[6] a faction within the Church of England.[7] James gave the translators instructions intended to guarantee that the new version would conform to the ecclesiology and reflect the episcopal structure of the Church of England and its belief in an ordained clergy.[8]
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
I get what you are saying, but the creation we occupy is an image (Genesis 1:27). When you look in the mirror, you see your image, but you know it is just light reflecting from your matter. When you know that you are INSIDE an image here in creation, you then ask the obvious question: Where am I?
Originally posted by HairlessApe
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
No, not really.
English came from German and Northern European languages.. It has influences from many western languages, but the Greek/Latin influence did not begin until the 13th century.
English is a West Germanic language that originated from the Anglo-Frisian dialects brought to Britain by Germanic invaders and/or settlers from various parts of what is now northwest Germany and the Netherlands.
wiki
It's absolutely not founded on the Bible. Just like most things people claim are founded on or discussed in the Bible. Like DNA.edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)
Before the King James, if you traveled 10 miles in England, the early English was not unified enough to understand from one clan to the next. After the printing of the Bible, the Hebrew and Greek brought the final version together from the languages of the Bible. Our alphabet of letters can be charted next to the Greek and Hebrew, not only by meaning, but by shape.
German is written under the Latin alphabet of 26 letters. As I pointed out, Aleph Bet is the Father (Letters) of the alphabet. The origin is not in the unfolded languages, but from the enfolded letters. DNA is the original. When an acorn unfolds, it is the oak tree. When the oak tree enfolds, it is the acorn. What is the germ in the center expressing the information (Letters) from the housing? When the seed (House) breaks, the germ expresses. We can claim the shadow we produced from the germ, but the germ itself IS creation.
God is the Strength of the House.
edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)
Incorrect.
The King James Bible was completed in 1611 (and was started in 1604) while modern English was adopted in 1550. King James I himself was only born in 1566. And actually, the King James Bible was created because previous versions of the Bible did not allow for ordained clergy members.
Modern English, which includes the works of William Shakespeare[39] and the King James Bible, is generally dated from about 1550
English Language
In January 1604, King James I of England convened the Hampton Court Conference where a new English version was conceived in response to the perceived problems of the earlier translations as detected by the Puritans,[6] a faction within the Church of England.[7] James gave the translators instructions intended to guarantee that the new version would conform to the ecclesiology and reflect the episcopal structure of the Church of England and its belief in an ordained clergy.[8]
King James Bible
Unfortunately all of this information gets distorted over the years by members of the church who are more than willing to take credit for something they didn't do. (Like elude to DNA before it's discovery) It's all part of indoctrination 101.
I hope this isn't too inflammatory, but I really want to include my favorite reference to the King James Bible here:
(WARNING: BILL MAHER)
edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
I'm not taking the Bible out of our history, I'm simply correcting your view of where it belongs in that history. It didn't forge the English language. Period. If you want to rebut that statement, find me a credible source (citation preferred) that says otherwise. I'll gladly give it a read.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
I'm not taking the Bible out of our history, I'm simply correcting your view of where it belongs in that history. It didn't forge the English language. Period. If you want to rebut that statement, find me a credible source (citation preferred) that says otherwise. I'll gladly give it a read.
Truth is Aleph (OX / God) Mem (Water / Mother) Tav (Marking). If you take Aleph from Truth, you get Mem Tav (Death). Aleph Bet is the strength of the house. By your words above, we can state it this way.
The letters didn't forge the English language.
That is a false statement. Truth includes the first letter, middle and last. Aleph Bet is the alphabet and this IS the strength of any language. It is the foundation. Again, English is founded on the letters and not the combinations thereof.
And yes, there is no paradox to your statement that English contains words (Bet Nun - Sons) from the the houses we call words and from the lands we call nations (languages). It's all Babel. Trace them all back and you get THE beginning (Aleph) and the End (Tav). Tav is two crossed sticks and the marking. Mem is the catalyst in the middle.
edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)