It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Unified Field as Motive - Proof God Created and Why

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 11:25 AM
link   
As many of you know, I have been very close to cracking the code of the underlying story in the Bible. Click my username to the left and read the three threads before this one. In this thread, I have finally answered the question, "How can an unchanging God express change?" Here is the argument. If God creates change, He has, Himself, changed. God is unchanging. How can this be? Physics answers the question and knowing why the Father in Hebrew is Aleph Bet shows us why light is information. The Alphabet is the answer and defining the word shows the final conclusion (Also DNA). Strong (Aleph / OX) Bet (House). The strong house is the Neutron of Strong Nuclear force. The Letters of Creation program the Neutron. The Higgs Field is the last Force to show this. As soon as they find it, this thread will show them why:

When we see paradox or contradiction, we are thinking that either it is this way or that way. When a paradox or contradiction exists, there is always a higher axiom to see that paradox can be resolved. In this case, quantum mechanics provides that answer.

God the Father (Aleph Bet) uses the Strong House (Strong Nuclear Force) as a way to show that letters are the starting point for creation to build the house. DNA is that code we look at from observation. Our own alphabet is the clue to this. Christ is the Word (Bet Nun), or house of the seed. What is the Mother? Aleph Mem is the Hebrew word for Mother (Strong Waters). The strong water is Hydrogen. To see why this is so important, you need to see the true meaning of baptism. We are immersed into the waters as a catalyst for the written and Living Word to come from the letters. Of course, this is the mechanism of the Trinity of One God to allow for new life from nothing to something. Since God is Infinite and Eternal as stated in the Bible, we can easily see that we are not. Why the Son?

From the beginning, the only way to realize new life is to allow it to be asymmetric and a variable of the first life. Here is how I prove this to you and change your entire outlook on what we are by comparison to an invariable symmetry like God. The five Platonic shapes in nature are our clue for how this works. Can you rotate a Platonic shape? Does the perspective on that shape change? No. It’s always the same, yet you can view it from all sides and it can move.

Here is another example by the Hermeneutics of rightly divided truth. As above, so below is a term you are familiar with. The lesser case compares to the greater. God is the greater case of why we have free will and how. The lesser case is quantum mechanics. Hydrogen has one proton one electron. This is the starting gate for Hydrogenesis. If God were to allow division of the balance between opposites, He would need to ensure that what is created cannot exceed unity to chaos. It should only be able to occupy a fallen state so that the nature of above and below can be seen clearly. How did an invariably symmetric God allow for this division?

Genesis 1 is a paradise. It is invariable symmetric and the Garden that we were removed from. Elohim created this paradise. Genesis 2 is the LORD creating the material image of the first. What is the difference? The electron is free and breaks symmetry in the second creation. In other words, it creates something new from the lesser rising back to the greater.

The strong nuclear force (Strong House) is Proton and Neutron (Father and Son as ONE). Protons have two up quarks and one down. Neutrons have two down and one up. The strong nuclear forces in nature follows symmetry perfectly when spin in considered by ratio. Electrons do not follow this symmetry and you cannot box in an electron. It will always free itself. It borrows from the future to repay the past if you know your quantum mechanics. This borrowing must be repaid. If you know how it is repaid, you know how the strong nuclear force always brings us back to symmetry. This is why God allows the error, but only by the fact that what is borrowed will return.

Here is a central truth: Each time an electron is borrowed, it must be paid back. The point is to become a proton in symmetry with the Neutron. When we switch polarity to the symmetry of the Trinity, we are free. What is the sign of this freedom? We create surplus by giving.

Now, consider the DNA of the letters being used to program the reality we occupy. Nature is the balancing point of law and the invariable cycle that we adapt to. As we rise, we see the nature of the one unchanging nature. Baptism is our immersion (involution) into the waters of the mother (Aleph Mem) and the Son (Bet Nun) is the carrier of the seed that allows us to know why sacrifice is so important. The only way to allow the variable is for God to allow a space for asymmetric reality. As the strong force pulling back the new creations, God is still invariable and symmetric in his own domain. We know this as involution and evolution. Nothing new can be created unless it is first fallen into the harmonies from above.

Let me prove this to you from Greek and Latin:

AMN is the root of Lamb. All words flowing on this branch of morphology modifies the Lamb. The sacrifice of the son is the lamb. We are the sheep of the shepherd, but we are also lambs before we rise to new life. We are Sons. We have Bet Nun (Housing Seed).

Amni is River of life
Amnio is the bowl catching the blood of the lamb
Amnion is the sac covering the womb
Amniotic fluid is the water of the lamb
Amnesia is the fact we cannot remember our invariable symmetric creation we God created us first.
Amnesty is the release we get when the thief stealing from the future is forgiven.

Put this together. The Shepherd pulls the wool over our eyes for a time (Amnesia). We are shorn season after season. You must be born again and there is no death. Death comes when you take Aleph (OX / GOD) out of Aleph Mem Tav), or the word Truth. Death is the word Mem Tav. The wool is washed white as snow by the one who pays the price (Strong Nuclear Force). The wool is then returned as a new robe and crown. Who’s robe do you wear if you are saved from the asymmetric variable? Christ’s Robe and not yours. You become the Son and wear the robe of the Proton. This is how God allows you to be a unique creation, yet he never changes. How?

God is over unity. He gives to create surplus. Once you figure out why surplus can be created by giving, you know how God can give so much. You can do the same, but only if you become the repenting thief on the cross with the one in the middle. Become the neutral, neither wicked nor self-righteous.

Read with new eyes:

Genesis 1
2 Now the earth (MATTER) was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters (HYDROGEN).

The first word in the Bible is Bet--The House. The Unified Field can now be defined with motive. From this, science knows where to look and how to see straight for it's theory. You heard it first on ATS.

This is not self-righteous pride. It's pride in a job well done. There's a difference. Truth is evident and I have denied our ignorance.

The End

New Assumptions


From this, we can make a few assumptions. First, light will be three. It is particle, wave and consciousness. Second, Light is likely the thing casting the shadow of DNA. DNA is in the material form, but light is in the hidden dimensional state. If this is true, light is likely a Toroidal aspect of the spin we see in all things (Golden Ratio).

Just an assumption on my part. Can someone else use what I have provided to fill in that blank for light? I think we have a way to see clearly now so to speak.






edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 11:36 AM
link   
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 





Amni is River of life
Amnio is the bowl catching the blood of the lamb
Amnion is the sac covering the womb
Amniotic fluid is the water of the lamb
Amnesia is the fact we cannot remember our invariable symmetric creation we God created us first.
Amnesty is the release we get when the thief stealing from the future is forgiven.


I wasn't aware the bible was originally written in English.



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 11:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 





Amni is River of life
Amnio is the bowl catching the blood of the lamb
Amnion is the sac covering the womb
Amniotic fluid is the water of the lamb
Amnesia is the fact we cannot remember our invariable symmetric creation we God created us first.
Amnesty is the release we get when the thief stealing from the future is forgiven.


I wasn't aware the bible was originally written in English.


Good point. DNA has 46 chromosomes. 2 pairs of 22 with 2 sex chromosomes. Hebrew has 22 letters and Greek 24. Together, they have 46. They are the shadow of the word we use to occupy our own space. Antiquity states that Hebrew and Greek are both divinely inspired languages. Do you see the shadow from the original?

What is English? Two becoming one. All languages sprouting from the original two will be this way. It is entirely possible that one language engaged the other three first. We may never know. We do know that langauge and DNA both use root codons (Morphology) to engage letters to Word. Father is Aleph Bet and Son is the Word created. See this in how proteins render the body. Proteins do the same thing from root. One protein is a word that then forms chains. 20 proteins and 2 that stop the process. Again, is this random?

John 1.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome[a] it.

There should be no probable way that I have this solid of an argument for you. Do you agree? The fact that the Aleph Bet is Called God the Father is one dice thrown (1/6). Two dice is 1/36. How many dice have I thrown here? I have thrown all the dice of creation and the same number keeps coming up. ONE.

Truth is Aleph (Beginning Letter), Mem (Middle) and Tav (Last). Christ is the Word called the beginning and end (Alpha and Tav / Omega). Mem is water. What are the odds the word Truth in Hebrew includes the Son? Where is the Son? Tav is two crossed sticks in the original proto Canaanite.


edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 11:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 





Amni is River of life
Amnio is the bowl catching the blood of the lamb
Amnion is the sac covering the womb
Amniotic fluid is the water of the lamb
Amnesia is the fact we cannot remember our invariable symmetric creation we God created us first.
Amnesty is the release we get when the thief stealing from the future is forgiven.


I wasn't aware the bible was originally written in English.


To follow you up again on this, I used Aleph Bet as Alphabet because this is where we derive our word. The Hebrew word for Father is Aleph Bet. Bet is the House and the first letter of the Torah. Genesis 1 engages with a word that starts with the building of the House.



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 11:57 AM
link   
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


Wow. Two different sets of numbers both equate to 46 when you add them together?

Mind blown.



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 12:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


Wow. Two different sets of numbers both equate to 46 when you add them together?

Mind blown.


Is English mostly Greek and Hebrew? It's founded on the Bible you know. When English was first unified, it was from the pages of the Bible where we see the King of England bringing the two together. If you scoff at As above, so below, then how do you describe the flight characteristics of a bird compared to a plane? What do you use in language to compare the two if you were drawing an analogy? By your version of comparison, there is not possible way. By my comparison, we see the lesser case in the greater because they have a correspondence.

Do the seasons in nature show a correspondence in your patters of behavior? Why? Natural law is in reflection above and below and apart from these laws, the strong nuclear force could not regulate and govern all that is below. From your biased standpoint on this matter, you are claiming there can be no comparison because there is no governor. I say there is.

Which view is correct?



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 12:03 PM
link   
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 

In this moment of presence there is light appearing - the light of consciousness or Christ the son of God.
In this moment of presence there is God that is seeing and knowing the light.

The light that is appearing now, right now and always now is constantly moving and changing - look and listen (see and hear). The light is arising and no one is making it happen but it is just happening always presently. The constantly changing present.

The seer of the light will never be seen - it is the unseen, never changing presence.

It is one and there is absolutely nothing else.



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 12:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


Wow. Two different sets of numbers both equate to 46 when you add them together?

Mind blown.


When the 46 chromosomes render the body by DNA (ALEPH BET), then we have a dual mind. We are both right and left brained, left and right handed and so on the pairs come forward. Hebrew is a concrete language based on nature. Greek is abstract and mathematical. Within the Hebrew, all numbers exist. Within the Greek, all the constants in nature are identified by each unique letter. How can this be you ask? Correspondence to the source they came from.

Are East and West fighting in the world today as predicted in Revelation? What happens when two come together as one? The third is regulated. The tyranny trying to bring the two together is doing it according to the path of the electron. What happens to the electron? It either comes to the positive or it is cast out.

Again, as above, so below. This hidden secret of strong and weak force is outlined in the Bible with every page. We see it in physics. We see it in our world today. EVERY movie is centered on the struggle of the hero (+) against the enemy (-). Hydrogen is the thing casting this shadow and the forces I outline dictate what happens below.



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 12:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 

In this moment of presence there is light appearing - the light of consciousness or Christ the son of God.
In this moment of presence there is God that is seeing and knowing the light.

The light that is appearing now, right now and always now is constantly moving and changing - look and listen (see and hear). The light is arising and no one is making it happen but it is just happening always presently. The constantly changing present.

The seer of the light will never be seen - it is the unseen, never changing presence.

It is one and there is absolutely nothing else.



God is one as the Bible states. Unity is not a paradox to multiplicity when multiplicity is finally united. What is the key to this? Love. Giving creates surplus and taking creates debt. Today, we are marked by our debt. What happens if you smoke (Taking a reward)? You suffer debt. What happens if you suffer at the gym? More heath (Reward). Either way, we suffer. Suffering on purpose is giving what you earn. Taking is the mark of the thief who takes (Electron) from his future.

Good comments.

On the cross, there were two thieves on either side of Christ. One repented and the other reminded the electron.




edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 12:12 PM
link   
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


No, not really.

English came from German and Northern European languages.. It has influences from many western languages, but the Greek/Latin influence did not begin until the 13th century.



English is a West Germanic language that originated from the Anglo-Frisian dialects brought to Britain by Germanic invaders and/or settlers from various parts of what is now northwest Germany and the Netherlands.

wiki

It's absolutely not founded on the Bible. Just like most things people claim are founded on or discussed in the Bible. Like DNA.
edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 12:17 PM
link   
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


It is only the mind with it's words and symbols that can ever have more than one. It is the mind that measures and divides.
This moment is whole, it is one undivided thing and the mind says past and future and it has imagined that there is more than this moment. Past and future do not actually exist - only as a word, a thought, an idea - as a concept.
This moment of presence is all that ever exists in reality and the bible tries it's hardest to point to it. But man is living in time and in abstract symbols - in a dream of separation - trying to find his way home.
You can never be separated from presence - there is only presence. All else is imagined, in presence as presence.

All is appearing here and now always.
This is it and it will always be this but this will constantly appear different.
What is knowing this?
edit on 18-7-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 12:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


No, not really.

English came from German and Northern European languages.. It has influences from many western languages, but the Greek/Latin influence did not begin until the 13th century.



English is a West Germanic language that originated from the Anglo-Frisian dialects brought to Britain by Germanic invaders and/or settlers from various parts of what is now northwest Germany and the Netherlands.

wiki

It's absolutely not founded on the Bible. Just like most things people claim are founded on or discussed in the Bible. Like DNA.
edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)


Before the King James, if you traveled 10 miles in England, the early English was not unified enough to understand from one clan to the next. After the printing of the Bible, the Hebrew and Greek brought the final version together from the languages of the Bible. Our alphabet of letters can be charted next to the Greek and Hebrew, not only by meaning, but by shape.

German is written under the Latin alphabet of 26 letters. As I pointed out, Aleph Bet is the Father (Letters) of the alphabet. The origin is not in the unfolded languages, but from the enfolded letters. DNA is the original. When an acorn unfolds, it is the oak tree. When the oak tree enfolds, it is the acorn. What is the germ in the center expressing the information (Letters) from the housing? When the seed (House) breaks, the germ expresses. We can claim the shadow we produced from the germ, but the germ itself IS creation.

God is the Strength of the House. And yes, our country and it's language is a melting pot of other languages, but it is primarily from two. Most of our commonly used words are from the influence of the Bible.

Foreign Languages and English


edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 01:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


It is only the mind with it's words and symbols that can ever have more than one. It is the mind that measures and divides.
This moment is whole, it is one undivided thing and the mind says past and future and it has imagined that there is more than this moment. Past and future do not actually exist - only as a word, a thought, an idea - as a concept.
This moment of presence is all that ever exists in reality and the bible tries it's hardest to point to it. But man is living in time and in abstract symbols - in a dream of separation - trying to find his way home.
You can never be separated from presence - there is only presence. All else is imagined, in presence as presence.

All is appearing here and now always.
This is it and it will always be this but this will constantly appear different.
What is knowing this?
edit on 18-7-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)


I get what you are saying, but the creation we occupy is an image (Genesis 1:27). When you look in the mirror, you see your image, but you know it is just light reflecting from your matter. When you know that you are INSIDE an image here in creation, you then ask the obvious question: Where am I?

You cannot answer apart from checking the Word expressed from the Father (Aleph Bet). He tells us. Not only does he tell us, he shows us from the same chapter how it works. It's quantum entanglement.

Matthew 18

10 “See that you do not despise one of these little ones. For I tell you that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father in heaven.

---You are the child of God here. Where is your true self in perfection as you develop toward this inheritance? The verse above says it is with God. Entanglement is the key. Read on.

18 “Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be[e] bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be[f] loosed in heaven.

19 “Again, truly I tell you that if two of you on earth agree about anything they ask for, it will be done for them by my Father in heaven. 20 For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them.”



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 01:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by EnochWasRight

Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


No, not really.

English came from German and Northern European languages.. It has influences from many western languages, but the Greek/Latin influence did not begin until the 13th century.



English is a West Germanic language that originated from the Anglo-Frisian dialects brought to Britain by Germanic invaders and/or settlers from various parts of what is now northwest Germany and the Netherlands.

wiki

It's absolutely not founded on the Bible. Just like most things people claim are founded on or discussed in the Bible. Like DNA.
edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)


Before the King James, if you traveled 10 miles in England, the early English was not unified enough to understand from one clan to the next. After the printing of the Bible, the Hebrew and Greek brought the final version together from the languages of the Bible. Our alphabet of letters can be charted next to the Greek and Hebrew, not only by meaning, but by shape.

German is written under the Latin alphabet of 26 letters. As I pointed out, Aleph Bet is the Father (Letters) of the alphabet. The origin is not in the unfolded languages, but from the enfolded letters. DNA is the original. When an acorn unfolds, it is the oak tree. When the oak tree enfolds, it is the acorn. What is the germ in the center expressing the information (Letters) from the housing? When the seed (House) breaks, the germ expresses. We can claim the shadow we produced from the germ, but the germ itself IS creation.

God is the Strength of the House.




edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)


Incorrect.

The King James Bible was completed in 1611 (and was started in 1604) while modern English was adopted in 1550. King James I himself was only born in 1566. And actually, the King James Bible was created because previous versions of the Bible did not allow for ordained clergy members.



Modern English, which includes the works of William Shakespeare[39] and the King James Bible, is generally dated from about 1550


English Language



In January 1604, King James I of England convened the Hampton Court Conference where a new English version was conceived in response to the perceived problems of the earlier translations as detected by the Puritans,[6] a faction within the Church of England.[7] James gave the translators instructions intended to guarantee that the new version would conform to the ecclesiology and reflect the episcopal structure of the Church of England and its belief in an ordained clergy.[8]


King James Bible

Unfortunately all of this information gets distorted over the years by members of the church who are more than willing to take credit for something they didn't do. (Like elude to DNA before it's discovery) It's all part of indoctrination 101.

I hope this isn't too inflammatory, but I really want to include my favorite reference to the King James Bible here:



(WARNING: BILL MAHER)


edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 01:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by EnochWasRight
I get what you are saying, but the creation we occupy is an image (Genesis 1:27). When you look in the mirror, you see your image, but you know it is just light reflecting from your matter. When you know that you are INSIDE an image here in creation, you then ask the obvious question: Where am I?



The image that is appearing right now is seen - can you see the present image? Do not look at yourself in the mirror - just look at what you see - the whole entire image that is appearing before you is not just visual, it is noise and thought and sensation all combined together as a whole is the image appearing presently. This image does not actually contain you - can you find you in the image? The word 'made' used earlier in one of the passages, to me, means imagined and is also the 'word' as no thing was 'made' without the word. The words that arise 'make' believe there is something other than this present peaceful empty of content moment.
In this moment there is no you - there is just God and the image that is appearing and then a thought (concept/the word) arises that 'made' believe you are something separate to this.
edit on 18-7-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 01:42 PM
link   
And what was forging those words from the top down? The church. You cannot take the Bible out of our history. It is the basis for literacy from the time 70 million fled Europe to the turn of the century when the industrial revolution was headed to the tech and communication revolution. Common law and literacy are founded on the inalienable rights and freedoms expressed by the laws of God locked into psalms and proverbs. As above, so below. The Strong force of Positive is two against one at all times. The weak force is heeled by the stronger force. As we cycle back toward tyranny, we know one very important fact. At each time and in all cycles, when negative is given the upper hand, it is a house divided that will quickly fail. This is the marker of all failing systems that are not founded on law.



Originally posted by HairlessApe

Originally posted by EnochWasRight

Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


No, not really.

English came from German and Northern European languages.. It has influences from many western languages, but the Greek/Latin influence did not begin until the 13th century.



English is a West Germanic language that originated from the Anglo-Frisian dialects brought to Britain by Germanic invaders and/or settlers from various parts of what is now northwest Germany and the Netherlands.

wiki

It's absolutely not founded on the Bible. Just like most things people claim are founded on or discussed in the Bible. Like DNA.
edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)


Before the King James, if you traveled 10 miles in England, the early English was not unified enough to understand from one clan to the next. After the printing of the Bible, the Hebrew and Greek brought the final version together from the languages of the Bible. Our alphabet of letters can be charted next to the Greek and Hebrew, not only by meaning, but by shape.

German is written under the Latin alphabet of 26 letters. As I pointed out, Aleph Bet is the Father (Letters) of the alphabet. The origin is not in the unfolded languages, but from the enfolded letters. DNA is the original. When an acorn unfolds, it is the oak tree. When the oak tree enfolds, it is the acorn. What is the germ in the center expressing the information (Letters) from the housing? When the seed (House) breaks, the germ expresses. We can claim the shadow we produced from the germ, but the germ itself IS creation.

God is the Strength of the House.




edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)


Incorrect.

The King James Bible was completed in 1611 (and was started in 1604) while modern English was adopted in 1550. King James I himself was only born in 1566. And actually, the King James Bible was created because previous versions of the Bible did not allow for ordained clergy members.



Modern English, which includes the works of William Shakespeare[39] and the King James Bible, is generally dated from about 1550


English Language



In January 1604, King James I of England convened the Hampton Court Conference where a new English version was conceived in response to the perceived problems of the earlier translations as detected by the Puritans,[6] a faction within the Church of England.[7] James gave the translators instructions intended to guarantee that the new version would conform to the ecclesiology and reflect the episcopal structure of the Church of England and its belief in an ordained clergy.[8]


King James Bible

Unfortunately all of this information gets distorted over the years by members of the church who are more than willing to take credit for something they didn't do. (Like elude to DNA before it's discovery) It's all part of indoctrination 101.

I hope this isn't too inflammatory, but I really want to include my favorite reference to the King James Bible here:



(WARNING: BILL MAHER)


edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 01:58 PM
link   
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


I'm not taking the Bible out of our history, I'm simply correcting your view of where it belongs in that history. It didn't forge the English language. Period. If you want to rebut that statement, find me a credible source (citation preferred) that says otherwise. I'll gladly give it a read.



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 01:59 PM
link   
reply to post by HairlessApe
 


The Bill Maher movie is an example of the same Self-Righteousness that is equated in the Bible with wickedness. On one hand, we have the wicked in the world who choose evil apart from a respect of law. As the circle turns back on itself, we have the righteous who choose wickedness in the name of preserving morality and goodness. In the middle, what do we have? One God pulling by the positive, yet unchanging as a symmetry of perfection. Does creation include all aspects of infinity, including the evil that can arise from choice? Yes. The entire point of the Bible, as seen from the standpoint of the law and physics, is LIFE. Where is the life? In the waters. At times, the waters are turbulent and at other times, the waters are calm. Stagnant water breeds disease. Rushing waters are hard to navigate. So, what's the point? What do we tell Bill Maher? He believes it is either positive or negative and there are no other ways to see God. Christians think it is only positive. The wicked see no reason to follow a law that can be broken. What is the answer?

The answer is in the OP. A calm sea does not a skilled sailor make. Confucius said, "I hear and I forget. I see and I learn. I do and I understand."

You need to do all three if you know that the unbalanced forces will always change your path. Physics and laws of motion are not something we create or some perceived necessity arising from nature settling into a state of rest from a high state of order. Not at all. We started at low entropy and high order. Chaos cannot move to unity with multiplicity apart from a consciousness arranging it by law. What is the purpose?

Bill Maher reveals himself as arrogant to claim that the LIFE he has is meaningless with laws of invariability and symmetry. Value does not come from any other place. Why is humility better than wickedness or self-righteousness? It is neutral. It knows the value of positive, yet understands the necessity of expanding infinity through choice. Apart form the unbalanced force, there is no choice to move a new direction.

God is perfection behind creation. Like it or not.

Bill Maher is showing himself to be somewhat of a hypocrite of sorts, condemning the very tactic he uses to show his version of morality above that of the other person. In reality, there is only law and if you break law, it breaks you. It is no respecter of persons.

Again, where is the mean? If you find it, it's golden.

What is the difference between my words and that of Maher? I am founding my words on the platform of natural law and truth. We can define the word truth and it includes the words and letters we use to define it. If we define truth by another standard, it is obvious as a counterfeit. Impenetrability states that two things cannot occupy the same space. When one enters the space of the other, the stronger of the two wins. The strong force will, in this case, show the weak by default.

Ignorance is denying the truth. Again, it will be revealed by natural law.


edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 02:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


I'm not taking the Bible out of our history, I'm simply correcting your view of where it belongs in that history. It didn't forge the English language. Period. If you want to rebut that statement, find me a credible source (citation preferred) that says otherwise. I'll gladly give it a read.


Truth is Aleph (OX / God) Mem (Water / Mother) Tav (Marking). If you take Aleph from Truth, you get Mem Tav (Death). Aleph Bet is the strength of the house. By your words above, we can state it this way.

IF YOU SAY: "The letters didn't forge the English language."

That is a false statement. Truth includes the first letter, middle and last. Aleph Bet is the alphabet and this IS the strength of any language. It is the foundation. Again, English is founded on the letters and not the combinations thereof.

And yes, there is no paradox to your statement that English contains words (Bet Nun - Sons) from the the houses we call words and from the lands we call nations (languages). It's all Babel. Trace them all back and you get THE beginning (Aleph) and the End (Tav). Tav is two crossed sticks and the marking. Mem is the catalyst in the middle.




edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 02:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by EnochWasRight

Originally posted by HairlessApe
reply to post by EnochWasRight
 


I'm not taking the Bible out of our history, I'm simply correcting your view of where it belongs in that history. It didn't forge the English language. Period. If you want to rebut that statement, find me a credible source (citation preferred) that says otherwise. I'll gladly give it a read.


Truth is Aleph (OX / God) Mem (Water / Mother) Tav (Marking). If you take Aleph from Truth, you get Mem Tav (Death). Aleph Bet is the strength of the house. By your words above, we can state it this way.

The letters didn't forge the English language.

That is a false statement. Truth includes the first letter, middle and last. Aleph Bet is the alphabet and this IS the strength of any language. It is the foundation. Again, English is founded on the letters and not the combinations thereof.

And yes, there is no paradox to your statement that English contains words (Bet Nun - Sons) from the the houses we call words and from the lands we call nations (languages). It's all Babel. Trace them all back and you get THE beginning (Aleph) and the End (Tav). Tav is two crossed sticks and the marking. Mem is the catalyst in the middle.




edit on 18-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)


Yea, no. You're wrong. Completely, blatantly, utterly, and dismally.

English is formed on the combination of letters. That's how words are formed. That's where the majority of the rules of the English language are held. That is where concepts are formed, and concepts are the basis behind language.

"Auf Wiedersehen" is not English. Period.
edit on 18-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join