posted on Jul, 15 2013 @ 11:47 AM
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by Barcs
Evolution has not been proven . There is no such claim been made that Evolution is fact . Secondly I could care less what skulls are compared to
another . The science community has not made the claim that evolution is a fact . And the claim that we evolved from a single celled amoeba would mean
that we would have actually lost DNA data as man has a less intricate DNA structure . Where was the food source for that cell ?
This is a religion blog not a science quiz . Where did this evolving germ come from ? If you can't answer that you can't be sure about it evolving .
I just gave you a link with 29 separate proofs for evolution. Of course you instantly dismissed it without even reading, typical creationist tactics.
Scientific theories are not made about imaginary concepts. If there is not enough evidence to suggest the concept exists, it will be a hypothesis.
To become a scientific theory, there must be objective evidence behind it. Modern synthesis as a process is absolutely a fact. Evolution = genetic
mutations sorted by natural selection. Which one of those is false? We may not know every single detail about every little thing and every single
species to ever walk the earth, but the process in itself can be measured and gene changes can be tracked. We can map genomes and measure genetic
mutations from parent to offspring. How do you think we linked Neanderthal DNA to our own? Genetic mutations are proven 100%. Natural selection has
also been observed and experimented with. It is absolutely a verifiable fact of nature. If you are trying to suggest the science behind evolution is
wrong, you need to address that science itself, instead if of speculating about stuff that is completely irrelevant. But in reality we all know
you've never touched a real science book or done a ounce of research on evolution besides on lying creationist websites. How can you say that man has
a less intricate cell structure than cells from 3 billion years ago when we don't have any evidence of ancient DNA / cell structure? That's a
complete guess, and a completely illogical one at that. If life started simple and slowly became more complex over time, then it makes sense that the
cellular structure would become more complex as well over time.
edit on 15-7-2013 by Barcs because: (no reason given)