posted on Jul, 7 2013 @ 06:14 AM
There's no comparison of size, so these could all be tiny, making them obviously rocks. There is also a lot of shadow play going on here, and it
would not be too hard to make something look like something else from the right angle.
Sorry, but once again all I see are rocks, unless there is some more adequate proof.
It all comes down to probability. Is it more likely that these are just rocks, or is it more likely that NASA hasn't noticed them, or covers them up
(while releasing images clearly displaying them?) Is it more plausible that finding something like this if it existed on Mars would be billions to
one, or more plausible that they just happened to land, move around a little, and find evidence of Humanoid existence while ignoring it?
If there is a skull sitting right there for all to see, seemingly undamaged, then where is everything else to prove life existed there? If there is a
skull on the surface, where is all the fossilized wood?
Nope, unless you can get up there and dig that out for me, I'm going with the most plausible and most likely scenario - it's a rock, possibly even
"adjusted" with shadows, and presented without size comparison in order to make it more intriguing.