It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why no mention of the 1000km tsunami that hit the US East Coast June 13/2013?

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 3 2013 @ 06:02 PM
link   
You would think it would have been at least minor news:

German article on June 13 2013 US East Coast tsunami 1000km long

Here is the Google translation:


An amazing flood on the east coast of the United States stunned scientists. On the afternoon of 13 June, they have flooded beaches of Massachusetts to Carolina, reported the tsunami warning center.



The analysis of data has only now revealed that 30 buoys were recorded in quick succession increased water level in very different marine regions - the wave front would therefore have been at least one thousand kilometers wide. Now scientists have puzzled over what caused it.



Brian Coen was fishing in the Barnegat Bay in New Jersey. At half past three pm, the clock running tide suddenly have strengthened considerably, Coen reports to the U.S. Weather Service. The strong current had pulled into the open sea divers. Hastily he had untied his boat so it does not capsized. Two minutes later, the sea had withdrawn so far that rocks on the bottom were exposed, would otherwise be flooded.


I did a search and couldn't find any mention. If someone already started a thread, that search function has failed me once again and I have to say it is much worse than the old one and should go. It is the "New Coke" of search engines.


edit on 3-7-2013 by PlanetXisHERE because: ATS' search engine frustrations




posted on Jul, 3 2013 @ 06:11 PM
link   
There have been threads about it in the past week.
Since there wasn't an earthquake associated with it, it has been treated more as a rogue wave which is thought to have formed due to atmospheric conditions.



posted on Jul, 3 2013 @ 06:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
You would think it would have been at least minor news:


www.abovetopsecret.com...
I'm sure there were more than just this one thread,



posted on Jul, 3 2013 @ 06:13 PM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


Because it wasn't a big deal.

It was discussed here: Tsunami Strikes the Jersey Shore

It may have qualified as a tsunami, but it didn't cause much destruction. Maybe the definition needs to be re-evaluated in light of recent information received?

It is interesting, but as is the nature of America, unless it is a tragedy it largely goes unnoticed.
edit on 3-7-2013 by watchitburn because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 3 2013 @ 06:21 PM
link   
1000 kilometers would be just over 3,280,000 feet or roughly 622 miles.

I think a wall of water 622 miles high would be reported somewhere.



posted on Jul, 3 2013 @ 06:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Trexter Ziam
 


Long, not high Padawan,,,



posted on Jul, 3 2013 @ 06:28 PM
link   
reply to post by watchitburn
 


Ah so Grasshoppa! Makes sense now!

May the force be with you too!



posted on Jul, 3 2013 @ 06:30 PM
link   
Okay, thanks guys, I figured as much.

Mods, that new search engine really sucks, the old one was better, see other comments in my OP.



posted on Jul, 3 2013 @ 10:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Okay, thanks guys, I figured as much.

Mods, that new search engine really sucks, the old one was better, see other comments in my OP.



Sssh, don't tell anyone
old search engine



posted on Jul, 4 2013 @ 07:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Pauligirl

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Okay, thanks guys, I figured as much.

Mods, that new search engine really sucks, the old one was better, see other comments in my OP.



Sssh, don't tell anyone
old search engine


Thanks Pauligirl! I smell a conspiracy..........



new topics

top topics



 
1

log in

join