reply to post by Kali74
First of all I never called you a liberal.
Did you write this story? I didn't think so. This story was written by the ap. The ap is nothing more than a mouthpiece for
the liberal agenda. I happen to work for a newspaper that uses the ap for their stories. In the last six years there has only been one story that
I can recall that spoke negatively of Obama. So yes this is definitely more liberal drivel.
I wouldn't take it personally if I were you. You might want to look into some of these groups. Most of them are made up of
people we don't buy into the two party system.
I also noticed that the only liberal group this story refers to is Catholics United if you haven't noticed the Obama
administration is also anti Christian.
A simple search would have told you that this has already been hashed over on ATS.
I personally liked this piece that charles1952 added.
Based on the information you flagged regarding the existence of a "Progressives" entry on BOLO lists, TIGTA performed additional research which
determined that six tax-exempt applications filed between May 2010 and May 2012 having the words"progress" or "progressive" in their names were
included in the 298 cases the IRS identified as potential political cases.
We also determined that 14 tax-exempt applications filed between May 2010 and May 2012 using the words "progress" or"progressive" in their names were
not referred for added scrutiny as potential political cases. In total, 30 percent of the organizations we identified with the words "progress"or
"progressive" in their names were processed as potential political cases.
In comparison, our audit found that 100 percent of the tax-exempt applications with Tea Party, Patriots, or 9/12 in their names were processed as
potential political cases during the time frame of our audit.
Oh ya tell me again how you can say Progressive and Occupy related groups were equally scrutinized by the IRS ?
The facts show things differentlt.
edit on 17-3-2014 by Diisenchanted because: (no reason given)
Also it should be pointed out that the first time this story came out it was posted by one of the people that responded to this
thread. funny that he didn't post the link himself. Oh that could be because it didn't play out the way he painted it.
edit on 17-3-2014 by
Diisenchanted because: edit to add