posted on Jul, 31 2013 @ 12:06 PM
Yeah, Childress is a fraud, but he doesnt know. Hes too deep into figuring it all out.
I was pretty pissed after watchin the 3rd episode of AA (i think it was seaon 3) because it was obvious that the producers were aiming at the same
target that jersey shore gathers, and its a shame.
The show is filled with stupidity, but the theory is still intresting, althou it has very few strong points, and the show sorta dug a nice ditch for
those too, as probably very few would want to be associated to such theory after it ''self ridiculed'' .
People like grayer dont do much good either btw.
For those like me that have always been intrested in the subject, being ancient mysteries, not necessarely alines, there is still some good work to be
found out there, but be weary of over enthusiastic chracters, like the above mentioned DHC.
Lemuria: it aint relevant how you call it, the fact that sunken cities are present all over the world, some datable to many thousands bc, is enuff to
consider it a more than plausable theory. The morphology of the Micronesia alone should be enuff actually, then we have sites like Nan Madol, for
which Academia gives no real explaination if not proof of use in ''recent'' times, but would be bette explained if put in a pre-flood context.
Yeah, the flood, sure it wasnt a deluge, but the ice that that covered most of the northern emisphere that melted...
Many myths have been proven to be hystorical fact in the past, i dont see a problem into considering it a possibility for it to happen again.
To be fair, i fully support Chriss Dunn's work, but only cause he does real research, as opposed to many he's seen with, and i found his presence in
the AA show completley out of context, but i suppose he has to eat too.