It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pthena
reply to post by Akragon
On the other hand i know God "micro manages" as you've put it... I have seen it with my own eyes many times... Almost daily these days actually...
People used to say to me that I seemed to live a charmed life - things just working out. I didn't know what it meant at the time. I thought that was just life.
So I got upset, "And exactly how does that help anyone else?" I asked. And maybe my life isn't so charmed as it was.
I don't think bad things happening to people is because they're bad people or anything. Jesus said that the Father brings rain and shine on the righteous and the unrighteous. Then the opposite is true also. I don't think it has to do with micro-managing.edit on 27-5-2013 by pthena because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jhill76
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by akushla99
I didn't realize I asked for everything at once. All I asked was who these "others" were. That's not everything is it? If it is then there's not very much to that truth.
Certain answers will lead you in a different direction. Then you will ask more, because you will not understand. To properly give all, one would have to explain a lot of background information. Not on an open forum.edit on 27-5-2013 by jhill76 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
reply to post by Akragon
Is it fair to say that God is a verb and not a noun?
Originally posted by Akragon
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
reply to post by Akragon
Is it fair to say that God is a verb and not a noun?
Fair to who?
can you narrow "God" down to a four letter word?
wait... You've read the Apocryphon of John right?
theres that echo again...
edit on 27-5-2013 by Akragon because: (no reason given)
I don't understand why you'd get upset though...
IF you've led a charmed life... Did you not share it with others along the way?
I don't like the term "micro managing" though... it sounds too... human...
People always try to personify God... I don't think its possible honestly...
You've read the Apocryphon of John right?
I kind of choked on the fact that Sophia was identified as the one who brought forth asexually, thus bringing into being a monster. That seemed a big slam against Philosophy, and at the same time being a slam against the Gospel of John's statement "children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will but born of God" John 1:13.
Honestly is it any more believable then revelation?
Did you mean that the other way around?
I loathe Revelation.
As for the Apocryphon, upon less impassioned circumstances, I think that the actual target for ridicule is Philo of Alexandria
Why do you say that?
Originally posted by pthena
reply to post by Akragon
Why do you say that?
I would have to check my sources for Philo to do a decent breakdown (and I'm too lazy right now)
but basically, as Wikipedia puts it, he represented the apex of Jewish-Hellenistic syncretism, combining Plato and Moses into one philosophical system.
Just from memory: the Sophia was always next to the god, from Sophia came the Logos (which is identified as Torah). So basically, Yahweh (Yaltabaoth) becomes a historical character not because of always being such, but rather because the pre-existent Logos(Torah) said so, (predestined it to be so). So Yahweh is not the boss of Torah, the Torah is the boss over and definer of Yahweh.
If someone wants to fact check the thumbnail I wrote, go ahead, that would just be saving me the work.
In gnostic theology Yahweh is basically the devil (demiurge) Which is where the Torah came from... Words of a fallen angel... given to moses
Originally posted by pthena
reply to post by Akragon
In gnostic theology Yahweh is basically the devil (demiurge) Which is where the Torah came from... Words of a fallen angel... given to moses
The Apocryphon is making fun of Philo, not agreeing. The wording is similar to Philo, so that a Philo follower would have zero trouble recognizing that his beliefs were being mocked.
I've got a new thread: The Psychology of Evangelism: Different World-views
motivation for the writer of this book was to make fun of another belief?
Originally posted by pthena
reply to post by Akragon
motivation for the writer of this book was to make fun of another belief?
Sure, anytime someone is teaching something new, they must compare and contrast with already existing systems of belief. Even without parody as a primary motive, parody does become part of the contrast.
IF God is Jealous, who is he Jealous of?
Absence of Love it is enough....
Why Father must use destruction to get mans attention,