reply to post by 3mperorConstantinE
Hence the denial I reckon.
Are we really going to do this again? Denial? Hardly. Its called knowing the difference between an over the top police response and a military
All of that ‘criticsm’ for Benghazi, eh? o.O Well, well, wells...Yes’um that ‘criticism’ must of sho’ been unpleasant. Such a good thing
you don't condone that being a reason to institute Martial Law (sorry), a ‘lockdown’
Way to completely miss the point, and throw out a lie while you are at it. Seriously, get better.
Hey–speaking of unpleasant, any word on that old guy CBS had been talking about during Friday's craziness? You know, the one that the police tackled
to the ground because he defied the friendly "shelter in place advisory"? But, I suppose the old dude had it coming. After all, if he couldn't
“stand up for his rights, what good are they.” ^your words, not mine
Tell me, do you have any evidence to show that he was only subdued because he was outside? That he was not acting in a suspicious manner? that
they did not have intel for that area?
look at that, more blind conjecture with no actual evidence
You know, the one on Arsenal St., where the police thought that the old man had a dead-man's switch in his hand--> so they pummeled him into a
heart-attack and had to have EOD robots come and deal with the guy... Let us know about that Cap‘n, because the police won't answer any one's
questions about it. CBS had been covering it, but it's understandable why the media might've felt that they were "advised" to drop it.
Do you think you are proving something with this tactic? All that you are proving is that you have not actually read a word I have said, and
that you are quite prone to (though not very good at) lying.
No matter how hard you try to make it seem that way, I have not said a single word in support of the reaction in boston. You are wither intentionally
lying, or really need to work on your reading comprehension.
But exceptional circumstances call for exceptional measures, right Cap’n?
They sure do.
1:15pm—1:15am shift, again. Bastards. Do you like this time, or do you prefer the 6pm—2am shift? …Just wondering.
Can you please provide proof that these people did not have the property owners permission to be there?
Because I know that an allegedly cognizant human being did not just spend 24 out of the last 54 hours posting on this thread feverishly trying to
paint the picture that more than 2.5% of Americans think that Martial Law Trainee Day is an acceptable way of dealing with a blood-thirsty
cookery-wielding college student gone AWOL in a Massachusetts suburb.
1)I am flattered that you care enough about me that you went back and counted up my posts in the thred, but I have to wonder, why? Why are you
so obsessed with me?
I defy anyone to go back through this thread and tell us who the calm one is. Hint: it aint you
3)Seriously, stop with the lies. Its pathetic. Its a sign of a low IQ. And its just downright sad. I have never said this was acceptable. I have never
spoken for anyone else. If you have to lie to try and discredit a person, what does that tell you?
I mean, I understand that Federal Gov. has no shortage of statist-cheerleaders, but their most fervant online-apologist couldn't hold a
candle-in-the-dark to you, my friend.
More foolish ad hom. This is truly, truly pathetic.
Ill say it one more time. I have refrained from personal attacks in this thread. I have called no names, I have thrown out no ad homs, I have made no
accusations of troll or shill or boot licker. Is it really that much to ask the same of you?
ETA: Ahhhh, I see now. A newly registered member with a points count of nearly -1000. Gotcha. Consider your posts ignored from here on out.
edit on 29-4-2013 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)