Syria used Sarin Gas??

So?

Gassing your enemy with Sarin isnt much more different than riddling him with bullets or torturing him to death.

He's doing it to his enemies and his enemies are doing it back to him.

I say, stay out of it.

When it turns biological, nuclear or when he starts crossing borders or gassing entire cities.. then yes we need to step in.

reply to post by phantomjack


Well there was a chemical attack, the question is who done it..

On April 23, a senior Israeli military official also accused Syrian forces of having used the nerve agent sarin against militants several times.

Damascus has repeatedly said that it will not chemical weapons in an attempt to end the unrest in the country.

However, the US and its allies previously ignored reports that the Syrian militants used such weapons.

At least 25 people were killed and 86 others injured after foreign-sponsored militants fired missiles containing poisonous gas into the town of Khan al-Assal, southwest of Aleppo, on March 19. Women and children were among the victims.

Don't know whether they are actually talking about the same incident but it seems we are looking for any opportunity to get into Syria while ignoring the very same acts/atrocities which are being committed by the rebels.

Just found this link concerning the UN finding out that the rebels have used Sarin gas.

www.reuters.com...

So if Assad uses chemical gases we invade. Yet if OUR allies the rebels use them??? Wonder what obama is going to say about this? Do we still invade?