Tsarnaev brothers didn’t rob a 7-Eleven

Now, after reading some of these posts I am not sorry I asked the question.
There have bbeen several good points made
The mechanic that the older boy had gone to to pick up his unrepaired car, said he thought the boy was on drugs and he had on 9oo dollar shoes..he made a real point of stressing these two points

I wonder why would you rob a seven eleven when you can afford 900 dollar shoes?
or where did he get 900 dollar shoes?

reply to post by Danbones


I saw a link on Drudge that mentioned something about them selling drugs to finance their operation.

reply to post by Cabalis


I understand that some of there aqaintances died with marijuana "sprinkled" on them some time ago
but we are told it was his best friend but then he complained of having no friends...

If you come across that link I would be gratefull if you could post it here Cab
it would be an excellent addition to the thread

reply to post by Danbones


No kidding. They were getting gas at the 7-Eleven for the black Merc SUV they carjacked. That's when the owner of the SUV made his escape.

Originally posted by DIDtm
reply to post by Danbones

 

Bit by bit.
This story crumbles.
Let the lies be caught.

What "lies"? It was garbage journalism from the MSM.

Originally posted by Danbones
well thanks for the corrections, I am glad you all posted them

so...what other mistakes has the media made that we as yet don't know about I wonder?

Like...umm....did they really ambush and kill that campus cop? I haven't heard yet, but did the kid admit to this yet or not?

reply to post by guymontag


If you think you have a right to see all the evidence ASAP, then do a little test.

Head on over to your local police station a few days after you read about any random murder in your area of town. Oh heck, wait a couple weeks just for fun. Then demand to see all the evidence they have gathered regarding the crime because it is unacceptable that they have not shown you the proof.

Let me know how that goes.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical

Originally posted by DIDtm
reply to post by Danbones

 

Bit by bit.
This story crumbles.
Let the lies be caught.

What "lies"? It was garbage journalism from the MSM.

an example of a lie would be:
the cops on another thread said the yonger one shot first and then they shot it out for an hour
( kinda like the rice krispie commercial where mom makes the rice crispies in 2 minutes but pours flour all over her self and waits twenty minutes so as to make it look like it was a big beal and all...)

then it turns out there was no gun

I'm curious about the amount of dis info and mistakes because it all works to hide the actual fackts

Originally posted by Rezlooper

Originally posted by Danbones
well thanks for the corrections, I am glad you all posted them

so...what other mistakes has the media made that we as yet don't know about I wonder?

Like...umm....did they really ambush and kill that campus cop? I haven't heard yet, but did the kid admit to this yet or not?

edit on 25-4-2013 by Rezlooper because: (no reason given)

They said on another thread that the Campus Cop's gun was still holstered - the brothers could not get it because of the saftey lock
so on TV that always indicates that the victim knew the killer and was not afraid of him/them...(? )

Originally posted by Danbones

Originally posted by NOTurTypical

Originally posted by DIDtm
reply to post by Danbones

 

Bit by bit.
This story crumbles.
Let the lies be caught.

What "lies"? It was garbage journalism from the MSM.

an example of a lie would be:
the cops on another thread said the yonger one shot first and then they shot it out for an hour
( kinda like the rice krispie commercial where mom makes the rice crispies in 2 minutes but pours flour all over her self and waits twenty minutes so as to make it look like it was a big beal and all...)

then it turns out there was no gun

I'm curious about the amount of dis info and mistakes because it all works to hide the actual fackts

Bullocks, there was only a single 9mm gun. No rifle.

The man who was carjacked saw the weapon and the 19 year old accidentally shot himself in the neck.

"Bollocks"

ooops so much for faith
He had no gun?