It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bekod
reply to post by Rocker2013
yes and no if you use a can of powder and bb's then you used a WMD device but if you use a sawed off shot gun you did not use a WMD but if you get your hands on a laws anti tank weapon and used it to blow up tree stump and you caused someone injury by doing so, then you can be charged with using WMD. or by mixing chem's together to clean a toilet and it blows up. Just the way the law is written. ???? mods remove this having issues at my end
Thank you SIR. I was thinking the exact same thing.
Originally posted by Rocker2013
Originally posted by Destinyone
Shrapnel = explosions of some sort. Mass shrapnel = mass destruction....
These were bombs that were used....remember...
The charge applies here.
Des
No, the definition of "Weapons of Mass Destruction" has been changed to dupe an idiot public.
A weapon of mass destruction is a nuclear weapon, a biological weapon, or a chemical weapon, capable of killing or maiming hundreds or potentially thousands of individuals EACH.
A pressure cooker device is not a weapon of mass destruction, and people should be asking why they are being treated like idiots who do not understand basic English.
Americans are being treated like idiots by their government, and many seem to be okay with thatedit on 22-4-2013 by Rocker2013 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by HomerinNC
Bottom line is this:
He used a device that caused MASS DESTRUCTION, death, injuries and damage to property thru explosives and rapidly expelled fragments or shrapnel
What do you call that?
A WEAPON OF MASS DISTRUCTION
Stop defending this dirtbag
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
Originally posted by HomerinNC
Bottom line is this:
He used a device that caused MASS DESTRUCTION, death, injuries and damage to property thru explosives and rapidly expelled fragments or shrapnel
What do you call that?
A WEAPON OF MASS DISTRUCTION
Stop defending this dirtbag
Well I call it an IED. Cause thats what it is... an IED.
(in this case its a weapon of mass distraction at best, but its still an IED)
Originally posted by Gazrok
I'm wondering though...anything he says while under sedation, any decent lawyer can likely get that testimony thrown right out. Is this amateur hour with the feds? Or are they simply confident they have enough evidence they aren't worried about it (or have it rigged enough)?
Originally posted by bekod
reply to post by FraternitasSaturni
yes it is and this is what the fed criminal complaint says about it, IED and WMD was used msnbcmedia.msn.com... it is found in paragraph 3 of the document er criminal complaint, can not copy from it.
edit on 22-4-2013 by bekod because: line edit
Originally posted by OratoryHeist
So THAT'S why they invaded Iraq and killed Saddam Hussein, he bought some new kitchen utensils!
Looks like we'll all be getting back ground checks when we go out to buy pots and pans next.