It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Boston Bombing Suspect Charged With Using Weapon of Mass Destruction

page: 2
8
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:34 PM
link   
reply to post by SpaDe_
 
already posted www.abovetopsecret.com... pleas keep from re posting already posted info , lust takes time up and adds nothing to the thread, ill check your source for it might be difrent




posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Originally posted by Destinyone
Shrapnel = explosions of some sort. Mass shrapnel = mass destruction....

These were bombs that were used....remember...

The charge applies here.


There's the logic I predicted:

Next it will be mass murderer shoots a mass of people... with a GUN... now the gun is the WMD... following that logic.


What logic might that be?

That some understand the meanings of certain terms,

Instead of acting all surprised why not look up the definition of Weapon of mass destruction and what weapons fall under this category, you will most likely find most explosive devices to fall under this category of weapons.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by guymontag
 
to whom are you posting or are you making a statement? The Gov and DA's can by NDAA do anything they want fair or not, we do not have a say other than to complain and then be put on a list



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:38 PM
link   
reply to post by watchitburn
 


Yes but the term has become somewhat generic (specially for shell casing fragments). I mean... aspirin is still aspirin even if its not aspirin right?

Give people a break will you?



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Rocker2013
 





No, the definition of "Weapons of Mass Destruction" has been changed to dupe an idiot public. A weapon of mass destruction is a nuclear weapon, a biological weapon, or a chemical weapon, capable of killing or maiming hundreds or potentially thousands of individuals EACH.


No, its a weapon capable of mass destruction, anything explosive falls under this category.

No need to to dupe any as many simply do not know.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by InhaleExhale
What logic might that be?

That some understand the meanings of certain terms,

Instead of acting all surprised why not look up the definition of Weapon of mass destruction and what weapons fall under this category, you will most likely find most explosive devices to fall under this category of weapons.


If you're not familiar with the concept of "Just because it's written, doesn't make it right"... then *whoosh*, congratulations you have learned something new today.

Have some intellectual honesty, that's all I ask.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by SpaDe_
 
ok thanks for the new source and i do apologize for ranting on you about re posting a posted info



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:40 PM
link   
Wow.... pressure cookers are now WMD's?

Well on the plus side - America shouldn't have trouble convincing the world that Iran has WMD's now

Winner, winner, chicken dinner!

(DISCLAIMER - No pressure cookers were used in the making of the fictitious chicken dinner or this forum post)




posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:41 PM
link   
reply to post by SpaDe_
 


Thank You, star for your effort


lots of ignorance being displayed in this thread about weapons of mass destruction.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by bekod
reply to post by SpaDe_
 
already posted www.abovetopsecret.com... pleas keep from re posting already posted info , lust takes time up and adds nothing to the thread, ill check your source for it might be difrent



(Situation clarified, but information still relevant)

I posted the domestic definition of a Weapon of Mass Destruction. The problem people are having with this is the definition of a WMD domestically vs internationally. The definitions are not the same.
edit on 4/22/2013 by SpaDe_ because:




posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:48 PM
link   
reply to post by bekod
 


The using a WMD has to be the most ridiculous charge since the trial of the Scottsboro Boys.

Why are they doing it....for effect...they are using key words like WMD so when Joe Schmoe happens to grab the front page and not the funny's tommorow he'll read about how a muslim detonated a weapon of mass destruction in Boston......he'll only read the words muslim and WMD, and that will be enough, what more does he need to know.

That will stay implanted subliminally with him from now on...the day the muslim kid killed people with a WMD in Boston.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by guymontag

Originally posted by InhaleExhale
What logic might that be?

That some understand the meanings of certain terms,

Instead of acting all surprised why not look up the definition of Weapon of mass destruction and what weapons fall under this category, you will most likely find most explosive devices to fall under this category of weapons.


If you're not familiar with the concept of "Just because it's written, doesn't make it right"... then *whoosh*, congratulations you have learned something new today.

Have some intellectual honesty, that's all I ask.




Sure tell that to people posting "Oh now pressure cookers and WMD".

A bomb is bomb which is a weapon of mass destruction, bombs can be created from very simple everyday things we use just as the bomb that was used, some of the components of that explosive device was a pressure cooker but the pressure cooker when used as it was with other components becomes a bomb which is a weapon mass destruction.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:52 PM
link   
reply to post by FraternitasSaturni
 


No.

But thank you for your time.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:53 PM
link   
Boston Bombing Suspect Charged With Using Weapon of Mass Destruction?

That's weird, because we remember that 550 tonnes of uranium, chemical & bio weapons, long range missiles were NOT Weapons of Mass Destruction... as we learned from Iraq.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:54 PM
link   
reply to post by bekod
 




first will he or will he not be charged as an enemy combatant

The official word is that he will NOT be held as an enemy combatant.
So when he is executed he will still be a US citizen.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 01:56 PM
link   
reply to post by InhaleExhale
 




A bomb is bomb which is a weapon of mass destruction, bombs can be created from very simple everyday things we use just as the bomb that was used, some of the components of that explosive device was a pressure cooker but the pressure cooker when used as it was with other components becomes a bomb which is a weapon mass destruction.

So glue some BBs to the outside of a Diet Coke and drop in a Mentos, screw on the lid, and get the chair.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 02:05 PM
link   
reply to post by SpaDe_
 
yes and yes
the info is coming in faster than i can keep up with it , this is not the first time a WMD has been used as a charge remember the Syria fighter that is a US citizen they used that on him , back to topic this from NBS yea i know MSM usnews.nbcnews.com... this shows that the US is not the BUSH order after all, from the link

The hospitalized Boston Marathon bombing suspect, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, was charged Monday with using a weapon of mass destruction – and the White House said he will be tried in a civilian court.

“He will not be treated as an enemy combatant. We will prosecute this terrorist through our civilian system of justice,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said.

“Under U.S. law, United States citizens cannot be tried in military commissions. And it is important to remember that since 9/11 we have used the federal court system to convict and incarcerate hundreds of terrorists.”

FBI Photo

Dzokhar Tsarnaev, 19, was charged Monday with using a weapon of mass destruction in connection with the Boston Marathon bombing.

Tsarnaev, 19, a naturalized U.S. citizen of Chechen origin, made his initial court appearance at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, where he was listed in serious condition.
Advertise | AdChoices

He was advised of his rights and charged with one count of using and conspiring to use a weapon of mass destruction in the U.S. and one count of malicious destruction of property with an explosive device. The charges could carry the death penalty.
so the questions have been answered his rights have been read, he is to be tried in Civilian Court, he is to be treated as any suspect, and i think other charges will come, this is the feds charges , Boston DA and Police still have theirs to fill and file



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 02:05 PM
link   
The definition of a WMD in the Oxford English Dictionary is

noun
a chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread death and destruction.

oxforddictionaries.com...



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 02:11 PM
link   
reply to post by InhaleExhale
 
could not agree more, the law needs to be changed for thsi is to vague to be used as a charge but it is the Gov and they can do do what they please til all of the BUSH era cronies and goons , thugs are no-longer in office and wisher more Humane to be humain ones come to power, if that ever happens.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 02:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by alldaylong
The definition of a WMD in the Oxford English Dictionary is

noun
a chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread death and destruction.

oxforddictionaries.com...



But when your the one writing the dictionary....its what you want it to be...

Theres a saying in Spanish - "Quien hace la ley, hace la trampa" - which means literally,"who makes the laws, makes the traps within"...and its true...
edit on 22-4-2013 by andy1972 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join