posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 09:12 AM
reply to post by loam
Yes but my point is that it is an assumption
, with out any physical proof as of yet.
Why even assume ?
Where is the proof ?
I dont call some one a "jackass" unless I can show his/her actions warrent being given the label.
it turns out he is the perpetrator of the poison mailings, then "crazy" would be an
To label him nuts, before any real investigation has been given a go is only an assumption
and borders on slander or defamation of character.
edit on 18-4-2013 by azureskys because: spelling correction
18-4-2013 by azureskys because: added thought