It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IntoxicatingMadness
Well the fact that the attacker was Saudi Arabian leans towards this. Seems to not have been of Korea, suppose I should have known, why do a small bomb when you're gonna nuke?
Originally posted by ForwardDrift
Originally posted by phantomjack
Originally posted by Cobaltic1978
A warning from Iran? I didn't think Al-Quaida operated out of Iran?
Just as Iran are in the cross hairs, this warning is released and then this?
The conspiracy part of my brain is doing overtime!!!edit on 15/4/13 by Cobaltic1978 because: (no reason given)
I dont think the country of origin is what is important. The Caliphate is what is important to islamist extremists. That is global, and not restricted to one country or another.
Jihad. Jihad. Jihad.
All now while we have the weakest president in office. At least Bush had the balls to respond. This president will want to take whomever on a round of golf to "talk it over"
Considering Obama took out Bin Laden while nearly all his advisors thought crossing into Pakistan was a bad idea and risky...I don't know if he is as weak as he claims he is. (Side note: I didn't vote for Obama or anyone) Just saying...
Originally posted by PheonixReborn
Originally posted by phantomjack
I must agree with you. I do not see a militia group taking out its own people. That just makes no sense.
Timothy McVeigh
Originally posted by phantomjack
No, McVeigh took out a government building. That is different than taking out innocent bystanders, IMHO.
Originally posted by milkyway12
In my opinion, this act deserves a war. We need to go in and send Iran to the stone age, if the Iranian people cannot oust the regime, then we will.
We put Iran down, then a lot of terrorists are going to be left out for dry.edit on 15-4-2013 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by milkyway12
In my opinion, this act deserves a war. We need to go in and send Iran to the stone age, if the Iranian people cannot oust the regime, then we will.
We put Iran down, then a lot of terrorists are going to be left out for dry.edit on 15-4-2013 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)
Are you for Real.......
Originally posted by phantomjack
All now while we have the weakest president in office. At least Bush had the balls to respond.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
You are going to let these alleged claims justify an invasion of Iran?
Haven't you ever heard of false reporting and propaganda?
There is no proof in this article that these claims were in fact made, someone is just trying to sell some books and forward a certain obvious agenda, and you fell for it...sad.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Originally posted by milkyway12
In my opinion, this act deserves a war. We need to go in and send Iran to the stone age, if the Iranian people cannot oust the regime, then we will.
We put Iran down, then a lot of terrorists are going to be left out for dry.edit on 15-4-2013 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)
You are going to let these alleged claims justify an invasion of Iran?
Haven't you ever heard of false reporting and propaganda?
There is no proof in this article that these claims were in fact made, someone is just trying to sell some books and forward a certain obvious agenda, and you fell for it...sad.
Originally posted by sealing
I betcha this isn't a middle eastern based attack.
Nor Muslim in any way. This will be home grown
and probably funded by grumpy tax paying billionaires
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by PheonixReborn
I do believe McVeigh said he would have chosen another target had he known there were kids in the building. Not to defend him, but it is really not even close to the same. He chose a specific target in RETALIATION of innocent people being killed.
It's weird to say, and what he did was wrong completely obviously, but you aren't going to see an American militia group or whatever, attack innocent people. If you know about the OKC bombing you will know that McVeigh was attacking the government in response to waco and ruby ridge where the govt killed innocent civilians.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by PheonixReborn
No. There is absolutely NO reason to believe that. The attack is definitely terrorist style (4 bombs to be coordinated). Why would a militia group do this. I wouldn't be surprised if the government tries to pin it on militia groups because the next move to further gun control advocacy is to make white people afraid of other white people, but it will all be b.s. It sounds like you want to help push that agenda for them with your inexplicable reasoning.
This will be a middle eastern attack, but if they don't get anyone they could try to pin it on militia but I am certain it's not. They are already holding a Saudi as a suspect, I would say they are holding him for good reason.edit on 15-4-2013 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by IamAbeliever
Sadly, I'm leaning toward this being domestic terrorism. History has shown us that these Islamic extremist groups are all too happy to stand up and claim responsibility rather quickly.
But, like everyone else, I really have no idea.