It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Red Cloak
Originally posted by butcherguy
Casualty estimates are often grossly overestimated by the war planners.
That way, when the war is over, they can say... 'We only lost a tenth of the number of men that we anticipated, look how well we did'.
Odd, considering they predicted 5,000 deaths for the Iraq War.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by Red Cloak
Originally posted by butcherguy
Casualty estimates are often grossly overestimated by the war planners.
That way, when the war is over, they can say... 'We only lost a tenth of the number of men that we anticipated, look how well we did'.
Odd, considering they predicted 5,000 deaths for the Iraq War.
All depends how you look at it....
Here is a site:
Anti-war.com
From there:
4488 total US servicepersons killed since 3-19-03.
4347 of those have been killed after 'mission accomplished'.
Until mission accomplished was declared, 141 died, and all of those were not combat deaths.
so, there are different ways of looking at things. I am sure that the the DoD touted the 141 number when 'Mission Accomplished' was declared.
Originally posted by Gazrok
reply to post by fenceSitter
For those who think the US will runover North Korea... remember we are only a few weeks away until the 10th aniversary of this great moment...
People just LOVE to belabor this point. They keep forgetting that the WAR part (toppling the leadership regime) took only about two weeks. It was the POLICE actions later, that took time and lives. In NK, it might take three weeks to take out Un and leaders, due to bunkers...but yeah, if we then get stuck trying to POLICE there, then we see more casualties.
Originally posted by Red Cloak
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by Red Cloak
Originally posted by butcherguy
Casualty estimates are often grossly overestimated by the war planners.
That way, when the war is over, they can say... 'We only lost a tenth of the number of men that we anticipated, look how well we did'.
Odd, considering they predicted 5,000 deaths for the Iraq War.
All depends how you look at it....
Here is a site:
Anti-war.com
From there:
4488 total US servicepersons killed since 3-19-03.
4347 of those have been killed after 'mission accomplished'.
Until mission accomplished was declared, 141 died, and all of those were not combat deaths.
so, there are different ways of looking at things. I am sure that the the DoD touted the 141 number when 'Mission Accomplished' was declared.
That simply proves the point. The Pentagon estimated there would be 5,000 US dead in the Iraq War and the actual number was higher. Some people are arguing the Pentagon estimates are purposefully made way higher than what they would be on purpose.
That's obviously not true.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by Red Cloak
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by Red Cloak
Originally posted by butcherguy
Casualty estimates are often grossly overestimated by the war planners.
That way, when the war is over, they can say... 'We only lost a tenth of the number of men that we anticipated, look how well we did'.
Odd, considering they predicted 5,000 deaths for the Iraq War.
All depends how you look at it....
Here is a site:
Anti-war.com
From there:
4488 total US servicepersons killed since 3-19-03.
4347 of those have been killed after 'mission accomplished'.
Until mission accomplished was declared, 141 died, and all of those were not combat deaths.
so, there are different ways of looking at things. I am sure that the the DoD touted the 141 number when 'Mission Accomplished' was declared.
That simply proves the point. The Pentagon estimated there would be 5,000 US dead in the Iraq War and the actual number was higher. Some people are arguing the Pentagon estimates are purposefully made way higher than what they would be on purpose.
That's obviously not true.
They estimated 5,000.
Actual number right now = 4488.
4,488
SK would love to police there after a NK fall. If we do fight, we should leave as soon as we win (in the conventional sense) and let NK handle the rebuild and re-unification.
I am saying the internal Pentagon death estimates are for ALL dead. The MEDIA estimates, the ones you quote, only are those dead on the ground. That does not include any dead that died in transport from the battle field, or that died after they were transported from the battle field.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
US dead?... nah!
The US would do nothing but sit in its boats lobbing missiles and sending jets.. the South Koreans, now they will be the ones to fight and die in the apparent war.