It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thoughtsfull
Putting my silly jokes to one side, I do find it interesting, if worrisome that this new information is offering a date where they can not offer safety beyond.. 10th April..
Is there anything happening around the 10th that would mean they could not guarantee an embassies safety? (aside from hot air and bluster)
Originally posted by jonnywhite
reply to post by judus
I absolutely agree with you that this will, if it were to become full-scale, would result in a lot of lives lost. Look at Iraq. They said it would be over in a few weeks. They acted like the whole operation would be done with a month or so and the Iraqi people would applause us and retake their country. But it didn't happen that way. Street to street fighting and LED's and so on. Thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of lives lost. Former cities reduced to ruin. A slowly recovering populace.
Originally posted by judus
Just to rant a little more
All I have read is talk of "the people of NK stave, treated badly, everything the people do is monitored and are slaves with no contact with the outside world"
I thought for a moment people were talking about the UK & US
Does nobody remember Iraq !!!!!!
Originally posted by billy565
What a mess.....I told you guys to vote for Romney.
Originally posted by traceee
Sorry if this is a bit off topic but I wanted to present my opinion:
What if the US pretty much already controls NK through "NWO", and they are attempting to create an illusion that war may come at any moment, to create restlessness and government dependency, and for the masses to subconsciously accept a war before it even occurs, which prevents rebelling. Lastly, the "NWO" may be trying to set up a final world war, but they must condition the masses to accept the concept of war, so this is why I think we are seeing all this Propaganda on the mainstream media. The only reason for which I think the "NWO" should want a war with Asia is to kill the dollar, or engineer another financial collapse.
What are everyone's thoughts?
Originally posted by MRedfield
"They won't do it, they need to do X first"
North Korea does X.
"That doesn't mean anything, they've done this before. They still need to do Y"
North Korea does Y.
"They're not even a real threat, we won't take it seriously until North Korea does Z"
North Korea does Z.
I've said it before, I'll say it again: Never underestimate your enemy.