It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by littled16
reply to post by neo96
Has anyone started a countdown as to exactly how many days these lunatics have left to wreak havoc on our country? I guess the only redeeming thing is that if the Democratic Party decides to run Joe as their candidate in the next presidential election and by some unfathomable chance he were to win he probably wouldn't remember that he was all for gun control and will have moved on to something else by then.
Originally posted by Ghost375
You say "they are coming for your guns?" The question is who are they?
I'm trying to point out that it's a small number of people. They are allowed to have the opinion that guns shouldn't be around. They are allowed to try to pass legislation to ban guns.
What pro-gun people need to do is talk calmly and rationally. This rhetoric that's being used is crazy and detrimental to the cause. The numbers are on our side. But calling people fascists who disagree with us, and otherwise saying crazy things will turn people away.
Some of you guys are so obsessed with guns, you're missing the big picture.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Ghost375
Point out where in the Us constitution does it say we have rights to a nuke?
Other than the fact no one can afford it, and there no range in the world one could ever set it off.
STRAWMAN
So by what right does my neighbor or some DC politician have to tell me what I can own?
Can you own drugs, explosives, nuclear bombs, a money printer? Strawman
What I said DIRECTLY responds to that question. It directly shows that there are many things the government regulates the possession of. That was the exact question you were asking.
It's actually YOU, who keeps using strawman attacks. You are making it out to be that Nukes were the centerpiece of my argument. They were an example.
And you completely missed my point. per usual on these types of threads.
But they are NOT coming for the guns!!!!
Originally posted by neo96
While I am at it laws against explosives have not worked either people make their own as seen on Youtube.
Laws against "bad drugs" haven't stopped usage either.
So the point was?
Just like Gun control laws what do they do?
They don't stop anything.
Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Mention guns on ATS..and the cowards will all jump in to spread the same old pro gun propaganda.
Guns prevent crime = LIE
Guns protect them from government = LIE
I need multiple weapons in order to protect my family = LIE
More guns means less crime = LIE
Gun registration does not help keep guns out of criminals hands = LIE
Less gun restriction means criminals find it easier to access weapons = TRUTH
I really do not see any good argument to own multiple weapons. I can see the argument for owning A weapon.
Mention guns on ATS..and the cowards will all jump in to spread the same old pro gun propaganda.
Guns prevent crime = LIE
Guns protect them from government = LIE
I need multiple weapons in order to protect my family = LIE
More guns means less crime = LIE
Gun registration does not help keep guns out of criminals hands = LIE
Less gun restriction means criminals find it easier to access weapons = TRUTH
I really do not see any good argument to own multiple weapons. I can see the argument for owning A weapon.
Your rhetoric is laughable
Can you own drugs, explosives, nuclear bombs, a money printer?
Mention guns on ATS..and the cowards will all jump in to spread the same old pro gun propaganda
I really do not see any good argument to own multiple weapons. I can see the argument for owning A weapon.
Originally posted by 1/2 Nephilim
reply to post by Ghost375
And you completely missed my point. per usual on these types of threads.
I didn't miss your point. You mean this one right?
But they are NOT coming for the guns!!!!
No, I saw it..