Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Biden Audio: Assault Weapons Ban 'Just The Beginning'

page: 1
39
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+21 more 
posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 01:24 PM
link   

"And lastly, but not least, the Assault Weapons ban and the limitation on the size of magazines, let me say this as clearly as I can: this is just the beginning.


www.breitbart.com...

They will not waiver,They will not falter,They will not yield with their diatribe about "weapons of war", and it's up to every American to make damn sure they fail.

I would love for anyone to show any US military servicemen or serviceman around the world who carries a AR-15 the civilian version of what a real weapon of war is a machine gun, full auto, high cyclic rate of fire.

Please I am begging you show me!

Hey Joe?

Weapons of war are not on our streets unless they are being carried by your Secret Service detail, or your boss's or SWAT, and other government agencies.




if you want to learn how to use a semi-automatic weapon, join the United States military


What what Joe?

Contradicting yourself there "semi auto" I have to join the military to learn how to use one?

Mighty fascist of you there Joe.
edit on 31-3-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 01:37 PM
link   
Your rhetoric is laughable.

Your comment about him contradicting himself is asinine.

Just because someone has a difference of opinion from you doesn't make them a fascist. People are allowed to hold the opinion that guns shouldn't be in civilian hands.

Not to mention, he is still only talking about high capacity weapons. Your "just the beginning" quote is taken out of context. The sentence immediately after shows he's still just talking about high capacity weapons.



let me say this as clearly as I can: this is just the beginning. We believe that weapons of war have no place on our streets.


Don't try to make that out to be he wants to come for all guns.
edit on 31-3-2013 by Ghost375 because: typo


+26 more 
posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 01:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Ghost375
 





Your rhetoric is laughable.


Actually Biden's and the entire gun control crowds "rhetoric" is laughable.





Your comment about him contradicting himself is asinine.


Do tell how is a semi auto rifle a "assault weapon" ?

Inquiring minds want to know.




Just because someone has a difference of opinion from you doesn't make them a fascist.


Oh we are talking more than just opinion here are there are a whole lot of totalitarian "bills" sitting in DC at the moment based off opinions.




People are allowed to hold the opinion that guns shouldn't be in civilian hands.


So by what right does my neighbor or some DC politician have to tell me what I can own?




Not to mention, he is still only talking about high capacity weapons.


No hes not as "assault weapon" is not a magazine as he clearly said:


if you want to learn how to use a semi-automatic weapon, join the United States military


If you want to learn how to use a semi auto weapon means handguns,shotguns,rifles, join the military, but last time I checked all his party does is gut the military.



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 01:53 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


They are going after everything. Just look at what they did to FPS Russia's you tube channel. He owned all his guns legally but the government agents claimed he had illegal explosives (which as far as i know he did not). They don't want people to watch his channel about guns. IF anyone doesn't think this is to push an agenda you are wrong wrong wrong



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 01:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Ghost375
 


That's OK, because how do you know that when they get your semi-autos and the clips they aren't going to come for you? How are you going to defend yourself with single shot rifles? Don't get sucked in by the governments bs. They only want your guns so you don't poe a threat to them.



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by DarknStormy
reply to post by Ghost375
 


That's OK, because how do you know that when they get your semi-autos and the clips they aren't going to come for you? How are you going to defend yourself with single shot rifles? Don't get sucked in by the governments bs. They only want your guns so you don't poe a threat to them.


But they are NOT coming for the guns!!!!
A small minority thinks it's a good idea. Most people don't! Plus, if anything happened, they wouldn't come door to door like you guys keep suggesting. That's crazy talk.

Notice how there's still not been any legislation passed since Sandy Hook?
If they had any chance of succeeding they would've done it within a month of that. You guys just keep doubling down with your insanity, and acting like they've already passed the legislation.

You guys are acting like they are making you slaves, when in reality a small segment of the population is merely talking about it.

What I'm trying to point out is your guys' response is not on par with what is actually occurring in the world.
edit on 31-3-2013 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96

So by what right does my neighbor or some DC politician have to tell me what I can own?

Can you own drugs, explosives, nuclear bombs, a money printer?

In a well-functioning society, we do have the right to prohibit certain items.

To make it clear, I'm pro-gun. I'm just anti-insanity. That's why I say what I say. That's why you don't understand what I'm saying.
I'm not saying your rhetoric is laughable because I disagree with your viewpoint. I'm saying it because what you wrote sounds bat-# crazy.
edit on 31-3-2013 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)
edit on 31-3-2013 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Ghost375
 


But this is just the beginning as the video suggests. So how are they going to force this to come to pass? Are they going to pick a random school, slaughter another 20 kids and then say "Enough is enough"? I think the intentions are quiet clear. They are coming for your guns, it's pretty simple. It doesn't matter what they have and haven't done right now, it's what they will do to get what the want down the track.



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:17 PM
link   
reply to post by Ghost375
 


YOU ARE SO OBLIVIOUS!!!

Biden is right there, knowing hes being recording, saying they DO NO WANT "WEAPONS OF WAR" (semi-automatic weapons) ON THE STREETS.

I see alot of people who are "willfully blind" but you must be willfully deaf too...
edit on 31-3-2013 by 1/2 Nephilim because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by DarknStormy
reply to post by Ghost375
 


But this is just the beginning as the video suggests. So how are they going to force this to come to pass? Are they going to pick a random school, slaughter another 20 kids and then say "Enough is enough"? I think the intentions are quiet clear. They are coming for your guns, it's pretty simple. It doesn't matter what they have and haven't done right now, it's what they will do to get what the want down the track.


You say "they are coming for your guns?" The question is who are they?
I'm trying to point out that it's a small number of people. They are allowed to have the opinion that guns shouldn't be around. They are allowed to try to pass legislation to ban guns.

What pro-gun people need to do is talk calmly and rationally. This rhetoric that's being used is crazy and detrimental to the cause. The numbers are on our side. But calling people fascists who disagree with us, and otherwise saying crazy things will turn people away.

Some of you guys are so obsessed with guns, you're missing the big picture.



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:22 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


One of the reasons why the 2nd Amendment and weapons in general are so important is because right now, government has to ask, they have to listen, they have to obey us. We the people.

They have to play by the rules.

But take away any attempt to hold government accountable, and they will be able to "tell" us what "they" want.



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by 1/2 Nephilim

And you completely missed my point. per usual on these types of threads.
edit on 31-3-2013 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:22 PM
link   
reply to post by Ghost375
 


I don't think congress has ever completed an objective at a reasonable time frame. Let alone something as important to the white house as gun control. Congress is on break 2/3s of the year and most don't even attend when they should.

We have not heard the end of this and won't as long as Obama is president.



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96
 


One of the reasons why the 2nd Amendment and weapons in general are so important is because right now, government has to ask, they have to listen, they have to obey us. We the people.

While I agree with your sentiment, since when have they been listening to us? Seems to me they can do whatever they want, guns or no guns.



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:25 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 
Has anyone started a countdown as to exactly how many days these lunatics have left to wreak havoc on our country? I guess the only redeeming thing is that if the Democratic Party decides to run Joe as their candidate in the next presidential election and by some unfathomable chance he were to win he probably wouldn't remember that he was all for gun control and will have moved on to something else by then.



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Ghost375
 





Can you own drugs, explosives, nuclear bombs, a money printer?


Strawman




In a well-functioning society, we do have the right to prohibit certain items.


Would not say the military/government,cops,criminals all being better armed than the Average John Doe is "well functioning".




I'm just anti-insanity.


Could have fooled me as the definition of insanity is keep doing to same thing over and over again expecting a different result.

1934,1968,1994,2013 bad them bad guns, and make people pay who have done nothing wrong.




I'm not saying your rhetoric is laughable because I disagree with your viewpoint. I'm saying it because what you wrote sounds bat-# crazy.


Whats "crazy" is making more laws for something that the law agianst murder already covers so do tell how many laws do we need for it?



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by JDmOKI
reply to post by Ghost375
 


I don't think congress has ever completed an objective at a reasonable time frame. Let alone something as important to the white house as gun control. Congress is on break 2/3s of the year and most don't even attend when they should.

We have not heard the end of this and won't as long as Obama is president.

haha, good point.

You need to drop the whole Obama thing though. There will ALWAYS be people who hold the opinion that guns should be outlawed. It has nothing to do with Obama. That's Fox News BS.
You know what pro-gun people need to do. Talk calmly and reasonably about it. Don't call people fascist socialists for holding that opinion.



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96
 


One of the reasons why the 2nd Amendment and weapons in general are so important is because right now, government has to ask, they have to listen, they have to obey us. We the people.

They have to play by the rules.

But take away any attempt to hold government accountable, and they will be able to "tell" us what "they" want.


The second is the foundation for all other rights we have that come from our creator, one goes down they all do.



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Ghost375
 




Can you own drugs, explosives, nuclear bombs, a money printer?


Strawman


That's not a strawman argument. You always do that Neo. When someone makes a point, you absolutely can't counter you just say strawman.



posted on Mar, 31 2013 @ 02:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost375

While I agree with your sentiment, since when have they been listening to us? Seems to me they can do whatever they want, guns or no guns.


Slowly and within reason.

Take away guns?

And it's a free-for-all.





new topics

top topics



 
39
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join